Innovation and competitiveness are linked to people’s innovative behavior, which implies that professional training should focus on both technical aspects and the development of competencies and skills to innovate. However, few studies identify innovation skills in university students in developing countries. Therefore, this research validated, through a structural equation model, an instrument with five dimensions that explain innovation skills in university students. The sample consisted of 536 undergraduate and graduate students in administration and business fields in Colombia. The results showed that the dimensions of creativity, critical thinking, initiative, teamwork, and networking have a direct and positive relationship with innovation skills. This research is the first study in Colombia to empirically validate the measurement scale and provides important information for decision-making in universities regarding the improvement of curriculum designs to develop innovation skills in future professionals, enabling them to be drivers of innovation and change in the organizational context.
AlanS (2019) Comparative investigation of entrepreneurship and innovation perceptions of preservice teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology7(4): 311–318. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1232745.pdf
2.
AltDKapshukYDekelH (2023) Promoting perceived creativity and innovative behavior: benefits of future problem-solving programs for higher education students. Thinking Skills and Creativity47: 101201.
3.
AsurakkodyTAShinSY (2018) Innovative behavior in nursing context: a concept analysis. Asian Nursing Research12(4): 237–244.
4.
AtasoyIÖzdemirSÇEvliM (2023) Relationship between individual innovativeness and 21st century skills of nursing and midwifery students: a cross sectional study. Nurse Education Today126: 105830.
5.
AvdeevaAPGrishaevaSAKhussainovaZS (2021) Socio-psychological characteristics of the innovative potential of students as indicators of professional elitism in a digital society. In: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Vol. 314: 809–818.
6.
AvsecSJagiełło-KowalczykMŻabickaA (2022) Enhancing transformative learning and innovation skills using remote learning for sustainable architecture design. Sustainability14(7): 3928.
7.
BagozziRPYiY (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16(1): 74–94.
8.
BrowneMWCudeckR (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research21(2): 230–258.
9.
CevikMSenturkC (2019) Multidimensional 21st century skills scale: validity and reliability study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences14(1): 11–28.
10.
ChoudharyMKumarSSubhash, et al. (2022) Understanding teamwork affects ingenuity in creative initiatives. World Journal of English Language12(3): 39–46.
11.
ChurchillGAJr (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research16(1): 64–73.
DerasidNACMustamalAHMohd AminNF, et al. (2016) Content Validity for Innovation Level of UTM Undergraduate Students: A Quantitative Approach. Husaincore.ac.uk. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/83531725.pdf
14.
DimovaRPelaK (2018) Entrepreneurship: structural transformation, skills and constraints. Small Business Economics51(1): 203–220.
15.
DyerJGregersenHChristensenC (2012) El ADN Del Innovador. Claves Para Dominar Las Cinco Habilidades Que Necesitan Los Innovadores. Deusto.
16.
EtikanIMusaSAAlkassimRS (2015) Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 2016, Volume 5, Page 1,5(1), 1–4.
17.
Ferreras-GarciaRSales-ZaguirreJSerradell-LópezE (2021) Sustainable innovation in higher education: the impact of gender on innovation competences. Sustainability13(9): 1–13.
18.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(February): 39–50.
19.
Fuentes ContrerasIRGonzalezMLFloresYZ (2023) E-learning and economics: knowledge dissemination through social networks. 9th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’23),153–160.
20.
GilbertNAhrweilerPPykaA (2007) Learning in innovation networks: some simulation experiments. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications378(1): 100–109.
21.
GolzarJNoorSTajikO (2022) Convenience Sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies1(2): 72–77.
22.
GonzalesMMGarzaTLeon-ZaragozaE (2024) Generating innovative ideas for school improvement: an examination of school principals. Education Sciences14(6): 650.
23.
HairJJAbdersonRETathanRL, et al. (1999) Análisis Multivariante. 5a.Prentice Hall.
24.
HanXXuQXiaoJ, et al. (2024) Academic atmosphere and graduate students’ innovation ability: the role of scientific research self-efficacy and scientific engagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education39(2): 1027–1044.
25.
HeroL-MPitkäjärviMMatinheikki-KokkoK (2021) Validating an individual innovation competence assessment tool for university–industry collaboration. Industry and Higher Education35(4): 485–496.
26.
HeviSSAgbenorxeviCDMalcalmE, et al. (2024) Digital learning space experience and learner continuous use in institutions of higher learning: a moderated-mediation model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning17(3): 433–447.
27.
HoneyMCollinsEBritnellS (2020) Education into policy: embedding health informatics to prepare future nurses—New Zealand case study. JMIR Nursing3(1): e16186–e16187.
28.
HuL-TBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
KeinänenMMKairisto-MertanenL (2019) Researching learning environments and students’ innovation competences. Education and Training61(1): 17–30.
31.
KeinänenMUrsinJNissinenK (2018) How to measure students’ innovation competences in higher education: evaluation of an assessment tool in authentic learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation58: 30–36.
32.
KirznerIMHebertRFLinkA (1983) The entrepreneur, mainstream views and radical critiques. Southern Economic Journal50(2): 611–612.
33.
KoyuncuogluD (2021) An investigation of potential leadership and innovation skills of university students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology9(1): 103–115.
34.
LiL (2023) Critical thinking from the ground up: teachers’ conceptions and practice in EFL classrooms. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice29(6): 571–593.
35.
Librado-GonzalezMRamirez-AnguloNOsorio-NovelaG (2024) A learning model based on the promotion of sustainable entrepreneurship in higher education. Visions for Sustainability22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/10760
36.
Marin-GarciaJAPérez-PeñalverMJWattsF (2013) How to assess innovation competence in services: the case of university students. Direccion y Organizacion50: 48–62.
37.
MiaoBLiangYSuoY (2023) The influence of organizational social network on enterprise collaborative innovation-mediating role of knowledge sharing and moderating effect of digital construction. IEEE Access11(August 2022): 5110–5122.
National Research Council (2011) Assessing 21st century skills: summary of a workshop. In: KoenigJA (ed) Assessing 21st Century Skills. Tha National Academies Press: 155.
ParidaVPesämaaOWincentJ, et al. (2017) Network capability, innovativeness, and performance: a multidimensional extension for entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development29(1–2): 94–115.
42.
PatelNSPuahSKokXFK (2024) Shaping future-ready graduates with mindset shifts: studying the impact of integrating critical and design thinking in design innovation education. Frontiers in Education9(June): 1–16.
43.
Pérez Alonso-GetaPM (2009) Creativity and innovation: an acquirable skill. Teoria de La Educacion21(1): 179–198.
44.
Pérez-PeñalverMJAznar-MasLEMontero-FletaB (2018) Identification and classification of behavioural indicators to assess innovation competence. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management11(1): 87–115.
45.
PerignatEMelocheA (2020) Synonymously different: examining business students’ implicit theories of creativity versus innovation. The Journal of Education for Business96(6): 352–358. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
46.
RahmanIKRosidahNSFaizahTA, et al. (2023) An investigation of the five factor personality traits and innovation skills of students in theology education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology11(4): 881–897.
47.
RampersadG (2020) Robot will take your job: innovation for an era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Research116: 68–74.
48.
SaxeRWeitzBA (1982) The SOCO scale: a measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Marketing Research19(3): 343–351.
49.
ScottSGBruceRA (1994) Creating innovative behavior among R&D professionals: the moderating effect of leadership on the relationship between problem-solving style and innovation. In: Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference - IEMC ’94: 48–55. IEEE.
50.
ShaneSVenkataramanS (2000) The promise of enterpreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review25(1): 217–226.
51.
TanCYAbdullahAGKAliAJ (2021) Soft skill integration for inspiring critical employability skills in private higher education. European Journal of Educational Research21(92): 23–40.
WannapiroonNPimdeeP (2022) Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: a conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies27(4): 5689–5716.
55.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2023) Global Innovation Index 2023. Innovation in the Face of Uncertainty.
56.
XieXYuYWangW (2023) Impact of vocational core competencies of higher vocational students on innovative behavior: the mediating effect of creative self-efficacy and moderating effect of core self-evaluation. Sage Open13(3): 1–13.
