Purpose: This study aims to examine the critical success factors (CSFs) of the Triple Helix Model (THM) that promote sustainable innovations in Technical Universities (TUs). Design/methodology/approach: The mixed method approach was employed, using 233 TU convocation members and 14 interviews. Thematic analysis, exploratory, confirmatory and score plot loadings were run to measure the CSFs of the THM. Findings: Qualitative and confirmatory analyses aligned on five CSFs, including vision and policies, technology, evaluation, leadership, and innovation. EFA identified eight CSF measures consistent with factor and score loading plots. Research limitations/implications: The study sampled three TUs. The CSFs will contribute additional knowledge to the framework. Practical Implications: Implementing the CSFs by the TUs, industry and government will enhance sustainable innovation. Social Implications: Tertiary education policymakers could adopt this model for innovation. Originality/value: The three CSFs contributed to the robustness of the THM.
AbdulaiAFMurphyLThomasB (2020) University knowledge transfer and innovation performance in firms: the Ghanaian experience. International Journal of Innovation Management24(03): 2050023.
2.
Abebe AssefaA (2016) University-industry linkage practices, determinants and challenges theoretical and empirical article review: lessons for effective and successful collaboration. International Journal of Research in Management6(3): 1–16.
3.
Abu MadiAAyoubiRMAlzbaidiM (2024) Spotting the critical success factors of Enterprise Resource Planning implementation in the context of public Higher Education sector. International Journal of Public Administration47(2): 73–89.
4.
AckahCAdjasiCTurksonF (2014) Scoping study on the evolution of industry in Ghana. Wider Working Paper075(1): 1–37.
5.
AdegbileASSarpongDCaoD (2021) Industry–university collaborations in emerging economies: a legitimacy perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management70(7): 2381–2393.
6.
AdjaKANyarkoDANunfamVF (2014) Industrial attachment in polytechnic education: an approach to polytechnic-industry nexus in human capital development of selected polytechnics in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice5(33): 33–49.
7.
AfolabiJAAdeyinkaFM (2024) THM: leveraging endogenous innovation systems for economic transformation in Africa. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development15(3): 225–242.
8.
AgbebiMSongJMammanA, et al. (2024) Afrocentric triple helix: a communal perspective on addressing Africa’s economic and social challenges. Africa Journal of Management10(3): 351.
9.
Al-HadiMAAl-ShaibanyNA (2017) Critical success factors (CSFs) of ERP in higher education institutions. International Journal7(4): 92–95.
10.
AljaberAMartinez-VazquezPBaniotopoulosC (2024) Developing critical success factors for implementing circular economy in building construction projects. Buildings14(8): 2319.
11.
AllardGWilliamsC (2020) National-level innovation in Africa. Research Policy49(7): 104074.
12.
AndrusMSpitzerEBrownJ, et al. (2021) What we can’t measure, we can’t understand: challenges to demographic data procurement in the pursuit of fairness. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, Virtual Event, Canada, 3–10 March 2021, 249–260.
13.
AnkrahSAl-TabbaaO (2015) Universities–industry collaboration: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management31: 387–408.
14.
ArmanHAl-QudsiS (2024) A strategic framework to analyse the East Asian miracle within triple helix model – lessons for Kuwait. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management15(2): 244–267.
15.
ArsawanIWEKovalVSuhartantoD, et al. (2024) Circular economy practices in SMEs: aligning model of green economic incentives and environmental commitment. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management73(3): 775–793.
16.
BambergerMRughJMabryL (2012) Real World Evaluation: Working under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
17.
BartelsFLKoriaR (2014) Mapping, measuring and managing African national systems of innovation for policy and development: the case of the Ghana national system of innovation. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development6(5): 383–400.
18.
BartelsFLKoriaRVitaliE (2016a) Barriers to innovation: the case of Ghana and implications for developing countries. Triple Helix3(1): 12–30.
19.
BartelsFLKoriaRAndrianoL (2016b) Effectiveness and efficiency of national systems of innovation: a comparative analysis of Ghana and Kenya. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development8(4): 343–356.
20.
BawakyillenuoSAkotoIOAhiadekeC, et al. (2013) Tertiary education and industrial development in Ghana. Policy Brief33012: 1–13.
21.
BizriRHammoudJStouhiM, et al. (2019) The entrepreneurial university: a proposed model for developing nations. The Journal of Management Development38(5): 383–404.
22.
Bodas FreitasIMMarquesRAde Paula e SilvaEM (2013) University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy42: 443–453.
23.
BoonsFMontalvoCQuistJ, et al. (2013) Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production45(1): 1–8.
24.
Bos-BrouwersHEJ (2010) Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business Strategy and the Environment19(7): 417–443.
25.
BraunVClarkeV (2024) Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: a review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine38(6): 608–616.
26.
BremARadziwonA (2017) Efficient Triple Helix collaboration fostering local niche innovation projects – a case from Denmark. Technological Forecasting and Social Change123: 130–141.
27.
CaiY (2014) Implementing the Triple Helix model in a non-Western context: an institutional logics perspective. Triple Helix1(1): 1–20.
28.
CaiY (2015) What contextual factors shape ‘innovation in innovation’? Integration of insights from the Triple Helix and the institutional logic perspective. Social Science Information54(3): 299.
29.
CaiYAmaralM (2021) The triple helix model and the future of innovation: a reflection on the triple helix research agenda. Triple Helix8(2): 217–229.
30.
CaiYEtzkowitzH (2020) Theorizing the triple helix model: past, present, and future. Triple Helix1(aop): 1–38.
31.
CaiYLattuA (2022) Triple helix or quadruple helix: which model of innovation to choose for empirical studies?Minerva60(2): 257–280.
32.
CarayannisEGCampbellDFJ (2019) Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems: How Social Ecology and Environmental Protection Are Driving Innovation, Sustainable Development and Economic Growth. Berlin: Springer.
33.
CarayannisEGCampbellDFJ (2021) Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate to Each Other?Berlin: Springer.
34.
ChaminadeCPadilla-PérezR (2017) The challenge of alignment and barriers for the design and implementation of science, technology and innovation policies for innovation systems in developing countries. Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies. Stefan Kuhlmann and Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros (eds).Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 181–204.
35.
ChenJK (2024) Identifying critical success factors of total quality management via comprehensive assessment of soft and hard factors. The TQM Journal36(3): 679–701.
36.
ChenSKouX (2020) Enhancing the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration: a case study of a Chinese research institute. Science and Public Policy47(3): 409–420.
37.
ChengCChengSFengC (2024) The THM for industry- education city integration in China: a development approach. Sage Open.
38.
ChiswaN (2024) Unravelling critical success factors in public-private partnership implementation. European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review19(1): 39–60.
39.
ChristouOManouDBArmeniaS, et al. (2024) Fostering a whole-institution approach to sustainability through systems thinking: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in sustainability integration in higher education institutions. Sustainability16(6): 2508.
40.
CilloVPetruzzelliAMArditoL, et al. (2019) Understanding sustainable innovation: a systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management26(5): 1012–1025.
41.
CreswellJWCreswellJD (2017) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42.
CreswellJWPothCN (2018) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
DaiYLaiSLimCP, et al. (2024) University policies on generative AI in Asia: promising practices, gaps, and future directions. Journal of Asian Public Policy17(3): 1–22.
44.
Del GiudiceMKhanZDe SilvaM, et al. (2017) The microlevel actions undertaken by owner-managers in improving the sustainability practices of cultural and creative small and medium enterprises: a United Kingdom–Italy comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior38(9): 1396–1414.
45.
DoepkeMGaetaniR (2024) Why didn’t the college premium rise everywhere? employment protection and on-the-job investment in skills. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics16(3): 268–309.
46.
DzisahJ (2011) Mobilizing for development: putting the triple helix into action in Ghana, in theory and practice of the triple helix system in developing countries issues and challenges. Rutledge Studies in Innovation, Organization and Technology3(8): 146–159.
47.
EtzkowitzH (2003) Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Social Science Information42(3): 293–337.
48.
EtzkowitzH (2007) The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Interactions for Innovation. London: Routledge.
49.
EtzkowitzH (2008) The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
EtzkowitzH (2013) Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Science Information52(3): 486–511.
51.
EtzkowitzHDzisahJ (2007) The triple helix of innovation: towards a university-led development strategy for Africa. ATDF Journal4(2): 3–10.
52.
EtzkowitzHDzisahJClouserM (2022) Shaping the entrepreneurial university: two experiments and a proposal for innovation in higher education. Industry and Higher Education36(1): 3–12.
53.
EtzkowitzHLeydesdorffL (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy29(2): 109–123.
54.
EtzkowitzHZhouC (2017) The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
EtzkowitzHZhouC (2018) Innovation incommensurability and the science park. R & D Management48(1): 73–87.
56.
FariaAFRibeiroJAAmaralMG, et al. (2019) Success factors and boundary conditions for technology parks in the light of the triple helix model. Journal of Business Economics10(1): 50–67.
57.
FerdinandsRAzamSMFKhatibiA (2024) The work in progress of a developing nation’s triple helix and its impact on patent commercialization. The case of Sri Lanka. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management15(4): 839–862.
58.
FitrianiSWahjusaputriSDiponegoroA (2019) Success factors in Triple Helix coordination: small-medium sized enterprises in Western Java. Etikonomi18(2): 233–248.
59.
GachieW (2020) Higher education institutions, private sector and government collaboration for innovation within the framework of the Triple Helix Model. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development12(2): 203–215.
60.
GatuneJ (2023) 16 THM for rice value chain in Kenya. Private Sector Development in an Emerging World. Diederik Boer, Harald Sander, Katharina Friz, Antonella Anastasi (eds).Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 279.
61.
GatuneJ (2024) Triple helix as model for driving innovation in emerging economies–what it takes. Private Sector Development in an Emerging World.Diederik Boer, Harald Sander, Katharina Friz, Antonella Anastasi (eds).Berlin: De Gruyter, 215.
62.
GorlachI (2017) A success of University-Industry partnership. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences4(6): 17–25.
63.
GuenduezAAFrischknechtRFroweinSC, et al. (2024) Government-university collaboration on smart city and smart government projects: what are the success factors?Cities144: 104648.
64.
GuerreroMUrbanoDFayolleA, et al. (2016) Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Business Economics47(3): 551–563.
65.
GuimónJ (2013) Promoting university-industry collaboration in developing countries. Policy brief. The Innovation Policy Platform1(3): 1–12.
66.
HailuAT (2024) The role of university–industry linkages in promoting technology transfer: implementation of triple helix model relations. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship13(1): 25.
67.
HickeyRDaviesD (2022) The common factors underlying successful international branch campuses: towards a conceptual decision-making framework. Globalisation, Societies and Education22(2): 364–378.
68.
IddrisuSAlhassanEKinderT (2014) Polytechnic education in Ghana: management delivery and challenges. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Invention1(6): 411–424.
69.
IrawatiD (2006) Understanding the THM from the perspective of the developing country: a demand or A challenge for Indonesian case study?MPRA5829: 1–16.
70.
JakovljevicM (2018) A model for innovation in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education32(4): 109–131.
71.
JaladinMRAMuhamadHSailinSN, et al. (2010) Higher education in Malaysia: current issue, challenges and hopes. In: Paper presented at Global Education System Day, Clayton Victoria, 11 May 2010.
72.
KamalMAGuhaSBegumNN, et al. (2024) Drivers of strengthening university–industry collaboration: implications for favorable outcomes. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning14(2): 237–254.
73.
KharazmiOAJohariL (2015) Evaluating the relationship between municipality and university in Mashhad using THM based on critical success factors. Management and Administrative Science Review4(2): 374–390.
74.
KimYKimWYangT (2012) The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: empirical evidence from the US. Research Policy41(1): 154–166.
75.
LeydesdorffL (2012) The triple helix, quadruple helix, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?Journal of the Knowledge Economy3(1): 25–35.
76.
LeydesdorffL (2018) Synergy in knowledge-based innovation systems at national and regional levels: the Triple-Helix model and the Fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity4(2): 16.
77.
LeydesdorffLIvanovaI (2016) “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: can synergy in innovation systems be measured?Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity2(1): 11–12.
78.
LiYCX (2014) Quality and quality assurance in Chinese private higher education. Quality Assurance in Education22(1): 65–87.
79.
LicheMBStřelcováAB (2023) The pathway towards triple helix: technology development evaluation in Ethiopian science & technology universities. Triple Helix10(1): 12–39.
80.
LouisGENazemiNRemerS (2017) Innovation for development: Africa. What do Science, Technology, and Innovation Mean from Africa, Clapperton Chakanetsa Mavhunga, The MIT Press,151–168.
81.
LundbergH (2013) Triple Helix in practice: the key role of boundary spanners. European Journal of Innovation Management16(2): 211–226.
82.
MamuduAHymoreFK (2016) Enhancing university-industry collaboration in Ghana for improved skills. In: Proceedings of INCEDI 2016 Conference, Accra, Ghana, 29th–31 August 2016, 941–954.
83.
MazandaranIMohsenikiasariMNikrouyZ (2024) A comprehensive framework for analyzing Industry-University collaboration. Management3(1): 1–22.
84.
MêgnigbêtoE (2013) Triple helix of university-industry-government relationships in West Africa. Journal of Scientific Research2(3): 214–222.
85.
MêgnigbêtoE (2019) Synergy within the West African Triple Helix innovation systems as measured with game theory. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration1(2): 96–114.
86.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldanaJ (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87.
MillidonisTLoisPGeorgiouI, et al. (2024) Critical success factors, institutional actions and instructors’ acceptance of e-learning in higher education: a systematic review. EuroMed Journal of Business1: 1450–2194.
88.
Ministry of Education (2014) Report of the Technical Committee on the Conversion of the Polytechnics in Ghana to Technical Universities. Accra: Ministry of Education.
89.
Ministry of Trade and Industry. (MoTI) (2010) The Ghana Industrial Policy. Accra: MoTI.
90.
MitikuGZelekeBAdemB (2021) Examining the role of TVET-industry partnership on the acquisitions of employability skills of polytechnic graduates in Oromia. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR)5(2): 588–596.
91.
MonteiroSRibeiroVMolhoC (2024) A 5 pillars approach to the sustainable development goals performance and reporting in Portuguese higher education institutions. Proposal for an applied framework. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education25(1): 104–123.
92.
MuparadziACaesarLD (2021) Examining the dynamics of Industry–University collaborations in Ghana. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education13(2): 591–608.
93.
OduroS (2020) Exploring the barriers to SMEs’ open innovation adoption in Ghana: a mixed research approach. International Journal of Innovation Science12(1): 21–51.
94.
OECD (2018) Embracing Innovation in Government Global Trends 2018. Paris: OECD.
95.
OjiakoUChipuluMAlmeileAM, et al. (2025) Variations in critical success factors of PPP-procured construction projects over lifecycle phases. Production Planning & Control36(5): 671–698.
96.
PetersenIHKrussG (2021) Universities as change agents in resource-poor local settings: an empirically grounded typology of engagement models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change167: 120693.
97.
Ponce JaramilloIEGüemes CastorenaD (2016) Identification of key factors of academia in the process of linking in the triple helix of innovation model in Mexico, a state of the art matrix. Nova Scientia8(16): 246–277.
98.
Rabelo NetoJFigueiredoCGabrielBC, et al. (2024) Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change203: 123383.
99.
RangaMEtzkowitzH (2013) Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for Innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education27(4): 237–262.
RibeiroVMonteiroSLemosK (2020) Sustainability and accountability in higher education institutions. In: CrowtherDSeifiS (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–14.
104.
RobiahRTelaumbanuaEMarzukiM, et al. (2024) The role of collaborative leadership in improving the quality of higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning2(2): 538–548.
105.
RybnicekRKönigsgruberR (2019) What makes industry-university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics89(2): 221–250.
106.
SáECasaisBSilvaJ (2018) Local development through rural entrepreneurship, from the Triple Helix perspective: the case of a peripheral region in northern Portugal. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research25(4): 698–716.
107.
SaadMZawdieG (eds) (2011) Theory and Practice of THM in Developing Countries. New York, NY: Routledge, 191–206.
108.
SaadMZawdieGMalairajaC (2008) The triple helix strategy for universities in Developing countries: the experiences in Malaysia and Algeria. Science and Public Policy35(6): 431–443.
109.
SafiullinLNFatkhievAMGrigorianKA (2014) The THM of innovation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences5(18): 203–206.
110.
SarkerFDavisHTiropanisT (2010) A review of higher education challenges and data infrastructure responses. In: International Conference for Education Research and Innovation (ICERI 2010), Madrid, 15–17 November 2010.
111.
SarpongDAbdRazakAAlexanderE, et al. (2017) Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change123: 142–152.
112.
SchofieldT (2013) Critical success factors for knowledge transfer collaborations between university and industry. The Journal of Research Administration44(2): 38–56.
113.
ShyiramundaTvan den BersselaarD (2024) Local community development and higher education institutions: moving from the triple helix to the quadruple helix model. International Review of Education70: 51–85.
114.
SjööKHellströmT (2019) University-industry collaboration: a literature review and synthesis. Industry and Higher Education33(4): 275–285.
115.
SupriadiAPermanaIAfandiDR, et al. (2024) The triple helix model: university-industry-government collaboration and its role in smes innovation and development. International Journal of Economic Literature2(1): 75–90.
116.
TelloSFYoonE (2008) Examining drivers of sustainable innovation. International Journal of Business Strategy8(3): 164–169.
117.
TumutiDWWanderiPMLang’at-ThoruwaC (2013) Benefits of university-industry partnerships: the case of Kenyatta university and equity bank. International Journal of Business and Social Science4(7): 26–33.
118.
United Nations (2022) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed 25 May 2022).
119.
Van DijkMP (2023) Triple Helix approach to innovation in Rwanda’s agriculture resulted in a partnership between educational institutions and a private firm producing clean seed potatoes. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies15(3): 2044–0839.
120.
VedelJBIrwinA (2017) ‘This is what we got, what would you like?’: aligning and unaligned academic-industry relations. Social Studies of Science47(3): 417–438.
121.
WangYHearnGMathewsS, et al. (2024) Networks, collaboration and knowledge exchange in creative industries: a comparative analysis of Brisbane and Shenzhen. Creative Industries Journal17(1): 88–112.
122.
YamaneT (1967) Statistics, an Introductory Analysis. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
123.
YinRK (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
124.
YoutieJShapiraP (2020) Building an innovation hub: a case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Regional Studies54(6): 791–803.
125.
ZhouCEtzkowitzH (2021) Triple helix twins: a framework for achieving innovation and UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability13(12): 6535.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
