This article presents a structural equation model based on the determination of linkage factors for managing innovation and technological development projects between Higher Education Institutions (HEI) and the Productive Sector (PS) in Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico. We conducted an exhaustive literature review and determined that five dimensions influence the success of the linkage between HEIs and the PS. This study aimed to validate a theoretical model using the multivariate structural equation modelling technique. We did so by analysing the data of 140 individuals from the productive, education, and government sectors, who responded to a survey instrument composed of 42 variables related to the linkage between HEIs and the PS. The specification of the measurement model was validated through convergent and discriminant validity, showing that the theoretical model and the statistical model are reasonably close to each other. Finally, the defined linkage factors were analysed. We will describe their impact and contribution to the field of HEI-PS linkage research.
AmaralMFerreiraATeodoroP (2011) Building an entrepreneurial university in Brazil. Industry and Higher Education25(5): 383–395.
3.
AnkrahSAL-TabbaaO (2015) Universities—industry collaboration: a systematic review, ScienceDirect, Scandinavian Journal of Management31: 387–408.
4.
BarnesTAPashbyIRy GibbonsAM (2000) Collaborative R&D projects: A best practice management model. In: 0-7803-6652-2/2000/10.00020IE0E0E. England: The University of Warwick.
5.
BattistellaCDe ToniAPillonR (2015) Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: a framework from critical literature review. J Technol Transf. Springer Science Business Media New York.
BozemanB (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy29: 627–655, School of Public Policy, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
8.
Byrne (1994) BM. Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
9.
CalcagniniGy FavarettoI (2015) A Models of University Technology Transfer: Analyses and Policies Guide. New York 2015: Springer Science Business Media. Published on line 01 august 2015.
10.
Capó-VicedoJExpósito-LangaMy Masiá-BuadesE (2007) La importancia de los clusters para la competitividad de las PYME en una economía global. Eure33(98): 119–133.
11.
ChenHy (2016) How can academic innovation performance in university–industry collaboration be improved?Technological Forecasting and Social Change123: 210–215.
12.
CohenWLevinthalD (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–152, Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, Mar., 1990.
13.
CupaniM (2012) Análisis de Ecuaciones Estructurales: Conceptos, Etapas de Desarrollo y Un Ejemplo de Aplicación. Revista Tesis1(2): 186–199.
14.
De FuentesCDutrénitG (2014) Geographic proximity and university–industry interaction: the case of Mexico. The Journal of Technology Transfer1: 1–20.
15.
De FuentesCy DutrénitG (2017) Technological capabilities for university industry links in the Mexican manufacturing sector. Ekonomiaz N.º 92, 2.º semestre1: 246–273.
16.
DutrénitGy ArzaV (2010) Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organisations and industry: comparing four Latin American countries. Science and Public Policy37(7): 541–553.
17.
Escobar-PérezJCuervo-MartínezA (2008) Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avancesenmedición6: 27–36.
18.
FilippettiAy SavonaM (2017) University–industry linkages and academic engagements: individual behaviours and firms’ barriers. Introduction to the special section. J Technological Transformation42: 719–729, Published online: 28 April 2017.
19.
FloresDy OlimónA (2015) Gobierno-Universidad-Sociedad, una relación necesaria y urgente. In: Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit.
20.
FornellCy LarckerD (1981) Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. USA: The University of Michigan.
21.
FrancoMHaaseH (2015) University–industry cooperation: researchers’ motivations and interaction channels. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management11: 1.
22.
FreemanC (1995) The national system of innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics1: 5–24.
23.
Galan-MurosVPlewaC (2016) What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessement. In: 2016 RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
24.
GonzálezHÁlvarezJFernándezG (2015) Development and validation of a scale for measuring intercultural empathy. E-Journal of Educational Research, Assessment and Evaluation1: 1134–4032.
25.
HertzogMA (2008) Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health31(2): 180–191.
26.
HuertaWJuanE (2012) Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales con. AMOS.31(1): 49.
27.
IvanovaIALeydesdorffL (2015) Knowledge-generating efficiency in innovation systems: the acceleration of technological paradigm changes with increasing complexity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change96: 254–265.
28.
KennethRS (2006) Building an Innovation Ecosystem; Process, Culture and Competencies. USA: Industry & Higher Education, pp. 219–224.
29.
KerryCHDansonM (2016) Open innovation, triple helix and regional innovation systems. Industry and Higher Education30: 67–78.
30.
LahikainenKKolhinenJRuskovaaraE, et al. (2018) Challenges to the development of an entrepreneurial university ecosystem: the case of a Finnish university campus. Industry and Higher Education33: 96–107.
31.
LehmannEMenterM (2015) University–industry collaboration and regional wealth. The Journal of Technology Transfer1: 1–25.
32.
MalhotraNKimSAgarwalJ (2004) Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, The Scale, and a Causal Model15: 336–355.
33.
MedranoLMuñoz-NavarroR (2017) Aproximación conceptual y práctica a los Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria11(1): 2223–2516.
34.
PerezMJy QuintalA (2020) Impacto de la planeación estratégica, RSE Y y desempeño no financiero en empresas de Quintana Roo, Un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Estudios de Administración28(1): 81–101.
35.
PickernellDCliftonNy SenyardJ (2009) Universities, SMEs and innovation frameworks. Industry and Higher Education23(2): 79–89.
36.
PlewaCQuesterPy BaakenT (2005) Relationship marketing and university–industry linkages: a conceptual framework. Sage Publications5(4): 433–456.
37.
PriggeGW (2005) University–industry Partnerships: What Do They Mean to Universities?USA: Industry & Higher Education, pp. 221–229. viewed June 2005.
ReguantMy Martínez-OlmoF (2014) Operacionalización de conceptos/variables. In: Dipòsit Digital de la UB. Barcelona.
40.
RinconW, A (2014) Comunicaciones en Estadística, diciembre 2014. Colombia: Universidad Santo Tomas.
41.
SarpongDAbdRazakAAlexanderE, et al. (2015) Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. USA: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
42.
SeguraAEstradaSy LeónM (2012), La transferencia tecnológica y el rol de las interfaces u organizaciones universitarias: El caso de una universidad pública estatal en México, COGESTEC p186-200.
43.
SpyrosAUrsinaKMartinW (2008) University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises, Research Policy37 (2008) 1865–1883. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005.
44.
TavakolMDennickR (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education2: 53–55.
ThomasBPackhamGMillerC (2006) Technological innovation, entrepreneurship, higher education and economic regeneration in Wales. In: A policy study, Industry & Higher Education, pp. 433–440.
47.
TiddJBessantJ (2015) CO foundations of managing innovation.
48.
UlrichK (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy24(3): 419–440.
49.
Villavicencio-CaparóE (2019) Revista OACTIVA UC cuenca.
50.
Wit-de VriesEDolfsmaWWindtH, et al. (2019) Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: a review. The Journal of Technology Transfer44: 1236–1255.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
