Institutional upheaval spurred by the COVID-19 crisis suddenly and dramatically transformed the rules of the game for higher education organizations. The global pandemic thrust colleges and universities into ambiguous institutional environments. Disruption of established routines and supply networks resulted in the near collapse of global supply chains providing personal protective equipment (PPE), particularly N95 masks, needed by healthcare workers on the medical frontlines. This study describes and analyzes higher education and industry (HEI) partnership collaborations that adapted rapidly and responded effectively to meet the critical PPE need. The Citadel, Military College of South Carolina (The Citadel), along with the Tommy and Victoria Baker School of Business (BSB) and its Innovation Lab., engaged in a partnership with medical professionals at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). This partnership successfully manufactured, assembled, and distributed one thousand 3D-printed N95 masks in a crucial 16-week period. The study also shows how organizations in both institutional fields were able to expand dynamic capabilities enabling them to sense opportunities and to seize them by engaging and supporting each other in rapid and effective resource reconfigurations. This HEI collaboration culminated in a memorandum of understanding for ongoing collaboration to develop innovations for future responses to healthcare challenges.
AlunurmRRõigasKVarblaneU (2020) The relative significance of higher education–industry cooperation barriers for different firms. Industry and Higher Education34(6): 377–390.
2.
AnderssonRErikssonHTorstenssonH (2006) Similarities and differences between TQM, six sigma and lean. The TQM Magazine18(3): 282–296.
3.
BatesT (2020) What should we be doing about online learning when social distancing ends. Online Learning and Distance Education Resources.
4.
BeckerMC (2004) Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change13(4): 643–678.
5.
BezjianJStoyanovaVMcKiernanPMacKayRB (2020) Synthesizing scenario planning and industry recipes through an analysis of the Hollywood film industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change150: 119777.
6.
BeebeRVonderwellSBobocM (2010) Emerging patterns in transferring assessment practices from f2f to online environments. Electronic Journal of e-Learning8(1): pp1–12.
7.
BhandariPBadarMAChildressV (eds) (2021) COVID-19 Surge planning in response to global pandemic in a healthcare setting: a lean six sigma approach. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Singapore: IEOM.
8.
BlassEHaywardP (2014) Innovation in higher education; Will there be a role for “the academe/university” in 2025?European Journal of Futures Research2: 41–49.
9.
BownCP (2020) 2 COVID-19: demand spikes, export restrictions, and quality concerns imperil poor country access to medical supplies. COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work31.
10.
CaiYEtzkowitzH (2020) Theorizing the triple helix model: past, present, and future. Triple Helix Journal7(2-3): 1–38.
11.
CapJPBlaichEKohlH, et al. (2019) Multi-level network management–A method for managing inter-organizational innovation networks. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management51: 21–32.
12.
ChodoshHE (2002) Teaching through tragedy of 9/11: crisis and opportunity. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law34: 189.
13.
CoghlanD (2011) Action research: exploring perspectives on a philosophy of practical knowing. The Academy of Management Annals5(1): 53–87. DOI: 10.5465/19416520.2011.571520.
14.
CoughlanPCoghlanD (2002) Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management22(2): 220–240.
15.
CristofolettiECPinheiroR (2023) Taking stock: the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on university–community engagement. Industry and Higher Education37(2): 251–264.
16.
DeanBP (2021) Multiteam systems as integrated networks for engaging ambidexterity as dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior24(4): 300–319. DOI: 10.1108/IJOTB-01-2021-0013.
17.
DickinsonJGriffithsT-LAustenL (2022) Collaborative methodological reflection: disrupting the ethical practices of a creative method in higher education research. Social Research12: 22–31.
18.
ElkhatatAMAl-MuhtasebSA (2021) Hybrid online-flipped learning pedagogy for teaching laboratory courses to mitigate the pandemic COVID-19 confinement and enable effective sustainable delivery: investigation of attaining course learning outcome. SN Social Sciences1(5): 113.
19.
Erro-GarcésAAlfaro-TancoJA (2020) Action research as a meta-methodology in the management field. International Journal of Qualitative Methods19: 160940692091748. DOI: 10.1177/1609406920917489.
20.
EtzkowitzH (2003) Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information42(3): 293–337.
21.
EtzkowitzHLeydesdorffL (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy29(2): 109–123.
22.
FeldmanMS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science11(6): 611–629.
23.
FeldmanMSPentlandBT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly48(1): 94–118.
24.
FinkenstadtDJHandfieldR (2021) Blurry vision: supply chain visibility for personal protective equipment during COVID-19. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management27(3): 100689.
25.
FlanaganSTBallardDH (2020) 3D printed face shields: a community response to the COVID-19 global pandemic. Academic Radiology27(6): 905–906.
26.
ForresterJDNassarAKMaggioPM, et al. (2020) Precautions for operating room team members during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the American College of Surgeons230(6): 1098–1101.
27.
García-NavarroJRamírezFJRuíz-OrtegaMJ (2019) Using action research to implement an operating efficiency initiative in a local government. Systemic Practice and Action Research32: 39–62.
28.
GereffiG (2020) What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies. Journal of International Business Policy3: 287–301.
29.
GolgeciIY PonomarovS (2013) Does firm innovativeness enable effective responses to supply chain disruptions? An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: International Journal18(6): 604–617.
30.
GolgeciIPonomarovSY (2014) How does firm innovativeness enable supply chain resilience? The moderating role of supply uncertainty and interdependence. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management27: 267–282. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2014.971003.
31.
GreenwoodRHiningsCR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review21(4): 1022–1054. Academy of Management. DOI: 10.2307/259163.
32.
GuanDWangDHallegatteS, et al. (2020) Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures. Nature Human Behaviour4(6): 577–587.
HodgesCBFowlerDJ (2020) COVID-19 crisis and faculty members in higher education: from emergency remote teaching to better teaching through reflection. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education5(1): 118–122.
HowardBE (2020) High-risk aerosol-generating procedures in COVID-19: respiratory protective equipment considerations. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery163(1): 98–103.
37.
HowdenSBeresford-DeyMMartindaleL (2021) Critical reflections on academic leadership during Covid-19: using Complexity Leadership Theory to understand the transition to remote and blended learning. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice9(2): 118–126.
38.
International Journal of Logistics Management, ahead-of-print, No. ahead-of-print (2021) Strategies to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on supply chain disruptions: a multiple case analysis of buyers and distributors. Butt AS. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-11-2020-0455.
39.
IvanovaIALeydesdorffL (2014) Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change86: 143–156.
40.
JeppersonRL (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 143–163.
41.
JohnsonNVeletsianosGSeamanJ (2020) US faculty and administrators' experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning24(2): 6–21.
42.
KähkönenAKEvangelistaPHallikasJ, et al. (2023) COVID-19 as a trigger for dynamic capability development and supply chain resilience improvement. International Journal of Production Research61(8): 2696–2715.
43.
KeaBJohnsonALinA, et al. (2021) An international survey of healthcare workers use of personal protective equipment during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2(2): e12392.
44.
KemmisS (2009) Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research17(3): 463–474. DOI: 10.1080/09650790903093284.
45.
KimHBaeJBrutonGD (2012) Business groups and institutional upheaval in emerging economies: corporate venturing in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management29: 729–752.
46.
LawrenceTBSuddabyR (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In: CleggSRHardyCLawrenceT, et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. 2nd edition. London: Sage, 215–254.
47.
LeydesdorffL (2000) The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy29(2): 243–255.
48.
LiNLauxCAntonyJ (2019) How to use lean Six Sigma methodology to improve service process in higher education: a case study. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma10(4): 883–908.
49.
LytrasMDSerbanACRuizMJT, et al. (2022) Translating knowledge into innovation capability: an exploratory study investigating the perceptions on distance learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic-the case of Mexico. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge7(4): 100258.
50.
McMannersP (2016) The action research case study approach: A methodology for complex challenges such as sustainability in aviation. Action Research14(2): 201–216.
51.
MoneyWHDeanBP (2019) Incorporating student population differences for effective online education: a content-based review and integrative model. Computers and Education138(September): 57–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.013.
52.
NandyMLodhSTangA (2021) Lessons from Covid-19 and a resilience model for higher education. Industry and Higher Education35(1): 3–9.
53.
NäslundD (2002) Logistics needs qualitative research—especially action research. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management32(5): 321–338.
54.
NewmanKL (2000) Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review25(3): 602–619.
55.
PanwarRPinkseJDe MarchiV (2022) The future of global supply chains in a post-COVID-19 world. California Management Review64(2): 5–23.
56.
PokhrelSChhetriR (2021) A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher education for the future8(1): 133–141.
57.
PonomarovSY (2012) Antecedents and Consequences of Supply Chain Resilience: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. PhD in Business Administration Diss. Tennessee: University of Tennessee.
58.
RajAMukherjeeAAde Sousa JabbourABL, et al. (2022) Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned. Journal of Business Research142: 1125–1139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.037.
59.
RangaMEtzkowitzH (2013) Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education27(4): 237–262. DOI: 10.5367/ihe.2013.0165.
60.
RazakAAWhiteGR (2015) The Triple Helix Model for Innovation: A holistic exploration of barriers and enablers. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling7(3): 278–291.
61.
ReasonPBradburyH (2008) The Sage Handbook of Action Research. 2nd edition. London: Sage.
62.
RehmanTKhanSAKusi-SarpongS, et al. (2018) Supply chain performance measurement and improvement system: a MCDA-DMAIC methodology. Journal of Modelling in Management13(3): 522–549.
63.
RemkoVH (2020) Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain–closing the gap between research findings and industry practice. International Journal of Operations and Production Management40: 341–355. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2020-0165.
64.
RofABikfalviAMarquesP (2022) Pandemic-accelerated digital transformation of a born digital higher education institution. Educational Technology and Society25(1): 124–141.
65.
Romero-HallECherrezN (2023) “Teaching in times of disruption: faculty digital literacy in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International60(2): 152–162.
66.
RothKKostovaT (2003) Organizational coping with institutional upheaval in transition economies. Journal of World Business38(4): 314–330.
67.
RowanNLaffeyJG (2021) Unlocking the surge in demand for personal and protective equipment (PPE) and improvised face coverings arising from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic–implications for efficacy, re-use and sustainable waste management. The Science of the Total Environment752: 142259.
68.
ScottWR (2014) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
69.
ShawMD (2017) Pathways to institutional equilibrium after a campus disaster. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management25(2): 103–113.
70.
StruthersDRAllsopYKalelioğluF, et al. (2022) The impact of COVID-19 on higher education: a systematic literature review of pedagogical approaches and challenges. Learning with Technologies and Technologies in Learning456: 367–390.
71.
SusmanGIEveredRD (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly23: 582–603.
72.
SwartzBCGachagoDBelfordC (2018) To care or not to care‒reflections on the ethics of blended learning in times of disruption. South African Journal of Higher Education32(6): 49–64.
73.
TabahARamananMLauplandKB, et al. (2020) Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): an international survey. Journal of Critical Care59: 70–75.
74.
Tébar-RubioJVRamírezFJRuiz-OrtegaMJ (2023) Conducting action research to improve operational efficiency in manufacturing: the case of a first-tier automotive supplier. Systemic Practice and Action Research36(3): 427–459. DOI: 10.1007/s11213-022-09616-w.
75.
TeeceDPeterafMLeihS (2016) Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review58(4): 13–35. DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13.
TouboulicAWalkerH (2015) A relational, transformative and engaged approach to sustainable supply chain management: the potential of action research. Human Relations69: 301–343.
VaivodeI (2015) Triple Helix Model of university–industry–government cooperation in the context of uncertainties. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences213: 1063–1067.
80.
WeeksMR (2007) Organizing for disaster: lessons from the military. Business Horizons50(6): 479–489.
81.
WoodsRDohertyOStephensS (2022) Technology driven change in the retail sector: implications for higher education. Industry and Higher Education36(2): 128–137.
YangLLiangYHeB, et al. (2023) COVID-19 moderates the association between to-metro and by-metro accessibility and house prices. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment114: 103571.
