The current entrepreneurial pedagogy focuses on enhancing students’ ability in discovering opportunities based on an understanding of users’ needs. This study challenges this dominant pedagogy by proposing a method to help students generate innovative ideas and create entrepreneurial opportunities by transforming the existing product’s meanings, or through a meanings design process, instead of only trying to understand users’ needs. The paper draws on social semiotic theories and theoretically proposes that, by transforming three product meanings (i.e., presentational, orientational and organizational), students are able to design a novel product and thus identify an entrepreneurial opportunity. A brief case study along with some students’ design projects are provided to illustrate how to use this method in teaching. This study is intended to provide entrepreneurship educators with a fresh tool to nurture students’ ability in identifying innovative opportunities and to immerse them in a more creative learning process while shaping their entrepreneurial mindset.
AkimovOKarpaMParkhomenko-KutsevilO, et al. (2021) Entrepreneurship education of the formation of the e-commerce managers professional qualities. International Journal of Entrepreneurship25(7): 1–8.
2.
AlsosGAClausenTHMauerR, et al. (2020) Effectual exchange: from entrepreneurship to the disciplines and beyond. Small Business Economics54(3): 605–619.
3.
AndersonARWarrenL (2011) The entrepreneur as hero and jester: Enacting the entrepreneurial discourse. International Small Business Journal29(6): 589–609.
4.
AutioEKenneyMMustarP, et al. (2014) Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy43(7): 1097–1108.
5.
AversaRPetrescuRVPetrescuFI, et al. (2016) Biomimetic and evolutionary design driven innovation in sustainable products development. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences9(4): 1027–1036.
6.
BakerT (2007) Resources in play: Bricolage in the Toy Store(y). Journal of Business Venturing22(5): 694–711.
7.
BarataJNevadoP (2014) Innovation, Design and Competitiveness: A Synthesis Based on Portuguese Case Studies. Reading: Academic Conferences International Limited, pp. 69–76.
8.
BaronRA (2006) Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. The Academy of Management Perspectives20(1): 104–119.
9.
BaronRAEnsleyMD (2006) Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science52(9): 1331–1344.
10.
BerendsHJelinekMReymenI, et al. (2014) Product Innovation Processes in Small Firms: Combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. Journal of Product Innovation Management31(3): 616–635.
11.
BlenkerPKorsgaardSNeergaardH, et al. (2011) The questions we care about: paradigms and progression in entrepreneurship education. Industry and Higher Education25(6): 417–427.
12.
BlijlevensJCreusenMESchoormansJP (2009) How consumers perceive product appearance; the identification of three product appearance attributes. International Journal of Design3(3): 2009.
13.
BogersMWestJ (2012) Managing distributed innovation: strategic utilization of open and user innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management21(1): 61–75.
14.
BoylesT (2012) 21st century knowledge, skills, and abilities and entrepreneurial competencies: A model for undergraduate entrepreneurship education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education15: 41.
15.
BrinkTSvendsenGLH (2013) Social Capital or Waste of Time? Social Networks, Social Capital and ‘Unconventional Alliances’ among Danish Rural Entrepreneurs. Business and Management Research2(1): 55.
16.
CappettaRCilloP (2008) Managing integrators where integration matters: insights from symbolic industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management19(12): 2235–2251.
17.
CappettaRCilloPPontiA (2006) Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation. Research Policy35(9): 1273–1290.
18.
CappettaRManzoniBSalveminiS (2010) Value drivers for cultural events: Empirical evidence from Italy. International Journal of Arts Management12: 4–16.
19.
CasakinHGoldschmidtG (1999) Expertise and the use of visual analogy: Implications for design education. Design Studies20(2): 153–175.
20.
ChandlerD (2007) Semiotics: The Basics. London, UK: Routledge.
21.
ChenSLinJ (2018) Brand Personification as Bonding. Chinese Semiotic Studies14(1): 13–39.
22.
ChilesTBluedornAGuptaV (2007) Beyond Creative Destruction and Entrepreneurial Discovery: A Radical Austrian Approach to Entrepreneurship. Organization Studies28(4): 467–493.
23.
ChilesTTuggleCMcmullenJ, et al. (2010) Dynamic Creation: Extending the Radical Austrian Approach to Entrepreneurship. Organization Studies31(1): 7–46.
24.
ChitturiRRaghunathanRMahajanV (2008) Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing72(3): 48–63.
25.
ClarkeJCornelissenJ (2011) Language, communication, and socially situated cognition in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review36(4): 776–778.
26.
CornelissenJClarkeJBedrijfskundeF (2010) Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning, and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review34: 4.
27.
CrillyNMoultrieJClarksonPJ (2004) Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies25(6): 547–577.
28.
DanesiM (2007) The Quest for Meaning: A Guide to Semiotic Theory and Practice. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
29.
DavidssonPDelmarF.WiklundJ. (2006) Cheltenham. Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Small Firms. Cheltenham: EdwardElgar.
30.
De GoeyHHilletofthPErikssonL (2019) Design-driven innovation: a systematic literature review. European Business Review31: 92–114.
31.
Dell'EraCVergantiR (2011) Diffusion Processes of Product Meanings in Design-Intensive Industries: Determinants and Dynamics*. Journal of Product Innovation Management28(6): 881–895.
32.
DewNReadSSarasvathySD, et al. (2011) On the entrepreneurial genesis of new markets: effectual transformations versus causal search and selection. Journal of Evolutionary Economics21(2): 231–253.
33.
DruckerPF (1987) Innovation and entrepreneurship. Newbridge Communications12: 172.
34.
EisenmanM (2013) Understanding aesthetic innovation in the context of technological evolution. Academy of Management Review38(3): 332–351.
35.
Eleonora CastellazziVBelliniE (2022) A values-based approach to radical innovation: Facilitating the reinterpretation of core values through design-driven practices. International Journal of Innovation Management26: 2240001.
36.
FryRBullenJB (2011) Vision and Design. Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
37.
GallowayLBrownW (2002) Entrepreneurship education at university: a driver in the creation of high growth firms?Education+ Training44(8/9): 398–405.
38.
GemserGLeendersMA (2001) How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management18(1): 28–38.
39.
GeroJSKannengiesserU (2004) The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Design Studies25(4): 373–391.
40.
GibbA (2011) Concepts into practice: meeting the challenge of development of entrepreneurship educators around an innovative paradigm. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research17(2): 146–165.
41.
GibbAA (1997) Small firms' training and competitiveness. Building upon the small business as a learning organisation. International Small Business Journal15(3): 13–29.
42.
GoldsbyMGKuratkoDFNelsonT (2014) Design-centered entrepreneurship: a process for designing opportunities. In: Annals of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy - 2014. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, p. 448.
43.
HallidayMA (1994) Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
44.
HallidayMAK (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. London: London Arnold.
45.
HallidayMAKMatthiessenCM (2013) Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar. London, UK: Routledge.
46.
HarringtonCMaysamiR (2015) Entrepreneurship Education and the Role of the Regional University. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education18(2): 29.
47.
HeyJLinseyJAgoginoAM, et al. (2008) Analogies and metaphors in creative design. International Journal of Engineering Education24(2): 283.
48.
JohannissonB (2018) Limits to and prospects of entrepreneurship education in the academic context. In: A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship Education. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
49.
JonesCEnglishJ (2004) A contemporary approach to entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training46(8/9): 416–423.
50.
KakourisALiargovasP (2021) On the about/for/through framework of entrepreneurship education: a critical analysis. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy4(3): 396–421.
51.
KasemsapK (2015) Advocating Entrepreneurship Education and Knowledge Management in Global Business. In: Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in the Contemporary Knowledge-Based Global Economy. Pennsylvania: IGI Global, p. 313.
52.
KatzJA (2003) The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876–1999. Journal of Business Venturing18(2): 283–300.
53.
KimbellL (2011) Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture3(3): 285–306.
54.
KressGSelanderS (2012) Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. The Internet and Higher Education15(4): 265–268.
55.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2002) Colour as a semiotic mode: notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication1(3): 343–368.
56.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2020) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London, UK: Routledge.
57.
KressGRVan LeeuwenT (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London, UK: Psychology Press.
58.
KrippendorffKButterR (1984) Product semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation3(2): 4.
59.
KuratkoDF (2005) The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(5): 577–598.
60.
LachmannL (1986) The market as an economic process. Southern Economic Journal. New York: Basil Blackwell.
61.
LangloisRN (2003) Schumpeter and the obsolescence of the entrepreneur. Advances in Austrian Economics6: 287–302.
62.
LeminenSWesterlundMNyströmA-G (2012) Living Labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review2(9): 6–11.
63.
LemkeJ (2005) Multiplying meaning. In: Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 87–114.
64.
LemkeJL (2018) Typological and topological meaning in diagnostic discourse. In: Discourse Processes. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 173–185.
65.
LemkeJL (2021) Cognition, Context, and Learning: A Social Semiotic Perspective. London, UK: Situated cognitionRoutledge, pp. 37–55.
66.
LewisD (2008) Convention: A Philosophical Study. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
67.
LewisDK (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press.
68.
MafimisebiOPObembeDAlukoO (2020) Organization and product design pairings: A review of product innovation capabilities, conceptualization, and future directions. Strategic Change29(1): 13–24.
69.
MartinJRRoseD (2003) Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
70.
MartinJRWhitePR (2003) The Language of Evaluation. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
71.
MarvelMR (2013) Human capital and search-based discovery: a study of high-tech entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(2): 403–419.
72.
MatlayHPittawayLEdwardsC (2012) Assessment: examining practice in entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training54(8/9): 778–800.
73.
Mc Cartan-QuinnDCarsonD (2003) Issues which impact upon marketing in the small firm. Small Business Economics21(2): 201–213.
74.
McMullenJS (2010) Perspective taking and the heterogeneity of the entrepreneurial imagination. Advances in Austrian Economics14(1): 113–143.
75.
McMullenJS (2015) Entrepreneurial judgment as empathic accuracy: a sequential decision-making approach to entrepreneurial action. Journal of Institutional Economics11(03): 651–681.
76.
MillsC (1967) The sociological imagination. British Journal of Educational Studies23: 527–535.
77.
MitchellJRShepherdDA (2010) To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing25(1): 138–154.
78.
MontuoriA (2003) The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: Social science, art and creativity. Human Relations56(2): 237–255.
79.
NeckHMGreenePG (2011) Entrepreneurship education: known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management49(1): 55–70.
80.
NormanDA (2004) Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
81.
NormanDA (2013) The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
82.
NormanDAVergantiR (2014) Incremental and radical innovation: Design research vs. technology and meaning change. Design Issues30(1): 78–96.
83.
NussbaumB (2005) The Empathy Economy-‚Design Thinking ‘can create rewarding experiences for consumers–the key to earning growth and an edge that outsourcing can’t beat. Businessweek Vom8.
84.
O'tooleM (1994) The Language of Displayed Art. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press.
85.
OgwaCEOgbuJE (2015) Promoting Entrepreneurship Education Skills in Electrical Installation for Sustainable Development. Journal of Educational Policy and Entrepreneurial Research2(9): 240–245.
86.
OosterbeekHvan PraagMIjsselsteinA (2010) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review54(3): 442–454.
87.
PaloTTähtinenJ (2013) Networked business model development for emerging technology-based services. Industrial Marketing Management42(5): 773–782.
88.
PartanenJChettySKRajalaA (2014) Innovation types and network relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(5): 1027–1055.
89.
PiperopoulosPDimovD (2015) Burst bubbles or build steam? Entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management53(4): 970–985.
90.
PolitisD (2005) The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(4): 399–424.
91.
PressmanSChoiYB (1997) Paradigms, Conventions and the Entrepreneur. American Journal of Economics and Sociology56(1): 51–68.
92.
RaeDCarswellM (2001) Towards a conceptual understanding of entrepreneurial learning. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development8(2): 150–158.
93.
RaeDWangCL (2015) Entrepreneurial Learning: New Perspectives in Research, Education and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
94.
RedströmJ (2006) Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Design Studies27(2): 123–139.
95.
SarasvathySDewN (2005a) New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics15(5): 533–565.
96.
SarasvathySD (2001) Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review26(2): 243–263.
97.
SarasvathySDDewN (2005b) New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics15(5): 533–565.
98.
SarasvathySDDewNReadS, et al. (2008) Designing organizations that design environments: Lessons from entrepreneurial expertise. Organization Studies29(3): 331–350.
99.
SarasvathySDRameshA (2019) An effectual model of collective action for addressing sustainability challenges. Academy of Management Perspectives33(4): 405–424.
100.
SarasvathySDVenkataramanS (2011) Entrepreneurship as method: open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(1): 113–135.
101.
SarkarS (2020) Grassroots entrepreneurs and social change at the bottom of the pyramid: the role of bricolage. In: Social Entrepreneurship and Bricolage. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 160–188.
102.
ShaneS (2012) Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review37(1): 10–20.
103.
ShaneSVenkataramanS (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review25(1): 217–226.
104.
SmithSSmithGShenY-T (2012) Redesign for product innovation. Design Studies33(2): 160–184.
105.
SullivanR (2000) Entrepreneurial learning and mentoring. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research6(3): 160–175.
Van LeeuwenT (1999) Speech, Music, Sound. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
108.
VenkataramanSSarasvathySDDewN, et al. (2012) Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review37(1): 21–33.
109.
VergantiR (2006) Innovating through design. Harvard Business Review84(12): 114.
110.
VergantiR (2008) Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management25(5): 436–456.
111.
VergantiR (2013) Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating what Things Mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
112.
VergantiRDell’EraCSwanKS (2021) Design Thinking: Critical Analysis and Future Evolution. New York, NY: Wiley Online Library, pp. 603–622.
113.
von KortzfleischHFMokanisIZerwasD (2012) Introducing Entrepeneurial Design Thinking. Fachbereich Informatik. Germany: University of Koblenz-Landau.
114.
WatsonKHogarth-ScottSWilsonN (1998) Small business start-ups: success factors and support implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research4(3): 217–238.
115.
WilsonSZamberlanL (2015) Design for an Unknown Future: Amplified Roles for Collaboration, New Design Knowledge, and Creativity. Design Issues31(2): 3–15.
