The notion of complementarity to analyse the relation between paid work and housework has had a limiting, and possibly misleading, influence upon understanding the persistence of inequality in the home. Through our interviews with a group of male shift working process workers, from three manufacturing firms, we explore their perceptions of their roles and relations at work and in the home. We focus upon their experience and interpretation of gendered role activity - themselves as breadwinners and their wives as homemakers. We explore their attitude to and experience of paid work, and their involvement in housework. We begin by considering the difficulties associated with defining housework, and measuring men's and women's levels of activity and responsibility. We consider what being a `breadwinner' means to the process workers, and how they translate this into their responsibility to enable their wives to be at home caring for their children. Then we focus upon one part of housework - laundering. Through this activity we explore the persistence of the unequal division of housework, despite changes in paid work, and highlight ways in which this inequality is sustained. We conclude that ambiguity, paradox and uncertainty undermine the dichotomous ordering of gendered relations, and that the balance and equity implied in the notion of complementarity provides an inadequate explanation of the gendered distribution of housework.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apter, T. and Garnsey, E. (1994) `Enacting Inequality: Structure, Agency and Gender', in Women's Studies International Forum, 17, 1, 19-31.
2.
Arber, S. and Ginn, J. (1995) `The mirage of gender equality: occupational success in the labour market and within marriage', British Journal of Sociology, 46, 1, 21-43.
3.
Barnes, G. (1990) `The “little woman” and the world of work', in R. J. Perelberg and A. C. Miller (eds) Gender and Power in Families, London: Routledge.
4.
Barrett, M. (1980) Women's Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis, London: Verso.
5.
Barrett, M. and McIntosh, M. (1990) `The “Family Wage”: Some Problems for Socialists and Feminists', in T. Lovell (ed.), British Feminist Thought, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 134-150.
6.
Barron, R. D. and Norris, G. M. (1976) `Sexual divisions and the dual labour market', in D. L. Barker and S. Allen (eds) Dependence and Exploitation in Work and Marriage, London: Longman, 47-69.
7.
Benjamin, O. and Sullivan, O. (1996) `The importance of difference: conceptualising increased flexibility in gender relations at home', Sociological Review, 44, 2, 225-251.
8.
Bereano, P.Buse, C. and Arnold, E. (1985) `Kitchen Technology and the Liberation of Women from Housework', in W. Faulkner and E. Arnold (eds), Smothered by Invention: Technology in Women's Lives, London: Pluto Press, 162-181.
9.
Bonney, N. and Reinach, E. (1993) `Housework Reconsidered: The Oakley Thesis Twenty Years Later', Work, Employment and Society, 7, 4, 615-627.
10.
Brannen, J. and Moss, P. (1991) Managing Mothers: Dual Earner Households After Maternity Leave, London: Unwin Hyman.
11.
Bruegel, I. (1979) `Women as a reserve army of labour: a note on recent British experience', Feminist Review, No 3.
12.
Bruegel, I. and Perrons, D. (1995) `Where Do the Costs of Unequal Treatment for Women Fall? An Analysis of the Incidence of the Costs of Unequal Pay and Sex Discrimination in the UK', Gender, Work and Organization, 2, 3, 113-124.
13.
Chiplin, B. and Sloane, P. J. (1982) Tackling Discrimination at the Workplace, London: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Cliff, D. (1993) ` “Under the wife's feet”: renegotiating gender divisions in early retirement', Sociological Review, 41, 30-53.
15.
Cockburn, C. (1983) Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change, London: Pluto Press.
16.
Cockburn, C. (1985) Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Knowhow, London: Pluto.
17.
Cockburn, C. (1988) `Masculinity, the Left and Feminism', in R. Chapman and J. Rutherford (eds), Unwrapping Masculinity, London: Lawrence and Wishart, 303-329.
18.
Cockburn, C. (1990) `The Material of Male Power', in T. Lovell (ed.), op cit, 84-102.
19.
Cockburn, C. and Ormrod, S. (1993) Gender and Technology In The Making, London: Sage.
20.
Cockburn, C. (1995) `Redrawing the boundaries: trade union, women and “Europe” ', in C. Itzin and J. Newman (eds), Gender, Culture and Organizational Change. Putting Theory into Practice, London: Routledge, 211-231.
21.
Collinson, D. and Hearn, J. (1994) `Naming Men as Men: Implications for Work, Organization and Management', Gender, Work and Organization, 1, 1, 2-22.
22.
Crompton, R. (1989) `Class Theory and Gender', The British Journal of Sociology, 40, 4, 565-587.
23.
Deem, R. (1988) Work, Unemployment and Leisure, London: Routledge.
24.
Delphy, C. (1984) Close to home, London: Hutchinson.
25.
Ehrenreich, B. (1992) `Life without father: reconsidering socialist-feminist theory', in L. McDowell and R. Pringle (eds), Defining Women. Social Institutions and Gender Divisions, Cambridge: Polity Press in association with the Open University, 140-147.
26.
Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1990) `Gender, Employment and Responsibilities to Kin', Work, Employment and Society, 4, 3, 349-367.
27.
Freeman, S. J. M. (1990) Managing Lives: Corporate Women and Social Change, Boston: The University of Massachusetts Press.
28.
Gavron, H. (1966) reprinted 1983, The Captive Wife: conflicts of housebound mothers, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
29.
Gershuny, J. and Jones, S. (1987) `The Changing Work/Leisure Balance in Britain, 1961-1984', Sociological Review Monograph 33, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 9-50.
30.
Gershuny, J. and Robinson, J. P. (1988) `Historical Changes in the Household Division of Labor', Demography, 25, 537-552.
31.
Ginn, J. and Arber, S. (1991) `Gender, class and income inequalities in later life', The British Journal of Sociology, 42, 3, 369-396.
32.
Glucksmann, M. A. (1995) `Why “Work”? Gender and the Total Social Organization of Labour', Gender, Work and Organization, 2, 2, 63-75.
33.
Hacker, S. (1990) Doing It The Hard Way. Investigations of Gender and Technology, London: Unwin Hyman.
34.
Hobson, D. (1978) `Housewives: Isolation as Oppression', in Women's Studies Group Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, Women Take Issue. Aspects of Women's Subordination, London: Hutchinson, 75-95.
35.
Hochschild, A. (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, New York: Metropolitan Books.
36.
Itzin, C. (1995) `Crafting strategy to create women-friendly work', in C. Itzin and J. Newman (eds), op cit, 127-151.
37.
Jackson, S. (1987) `Great Britain', in M. E. Lamb (ed.) The Father's Role: Cross Cultural Perspectives, New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaum Asson.
38.
Jenkins, C. and Sherman, B. (1979) The Collapse of Work. London: Eyre Methuen.
39.
Kiernan, K. (1992a) `Men and Women at Work and at Home', in R. Jowell, L. Brook, G. Prior and B. Taylor (eds), British Social Attitudes the 9th report, 1992/93 edition, Aldershot: Dartmouth, 89-112.
40.
Kremer, J. and Montgomery, P. (eds) (1993), Women's Working Lives, Northern Ireland: Equal Opportunities Commission for Northern Ireland.
41.
Lewis, S. and Cooper, C. L. (1989), Career Couples, London: Unwin Hyman.
42.
Lupton, D. (1994) `Food, memory and meaning: the symbolic and social nature of food events', The Sociological Review, 42, 4, 664-685.
43.
Mackie, L. and Pattullo, P. (1977) Women at Work, London: Tavistock.
44.
Madigan, R. and Munro, M. (1996) ` “House Beautiful” Style and Consumption in the home', Sociology, 30, 1, 41-57.
45.
Maynard, M. (1985) `Houseworkers and their work', in R. Deem and G. Salaman (eds) Work, Culture and Society, Milton Keynes: Open University Press. 130-149.
46.
McDowell, L. and Pringle, R. (eds), (1992) Defining women. Social Institutions and Gender Divisions, Oxford: Polity Press in association with the Open University.
47.
McKee, L. and Bell, C. (1986) `His unemployment, her problem: the domestic and marital consequences of male unemployment' in S. Allen, A. Watson, K. Purcell and S. Wood (eds), The Changing Experience of Unemployment, London: Macmillan, 134-149.
48.
McRae, S. (1986) Cross-Class Families. A study of wives occupational security, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49.
Morris, L. (1985) `Local social networks and domestic organisations: a study of redundant steel workers and their wives', Sociological Review, 31, 2, 327-342.
50.
Morris, L. (1993) `Domestic Labour and Employment Status among Married Couples: a case study in Hartlepool', Capital and Class, 4, Spring, 37-52.
51.
Newell, S. (1993) `The Superwoman Syndrome: Gender Differences in Attitudes Towards Equal Opportunities at Work and Towards Domestic Responsibilities at Home', Work, Employment and Society, 7, 2, 275-289.
52.
Oakley, A. (1974) The Sociology of Housework, London: Martin Robertson.
53.
Oakley, A. (1990) `What is a housewife', in T. Lovell (ed.), op cit, 77-83.
54.
Packer, K. (1996) `The context-dependent nature of the gendering of technical work: a case study of work in a scientific laboratory', Work, Employment and Society, 10, 1, 125-149.
55.
Pahl, R. E. (ed.), (1988) On Work: Historical Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives, Oxford: Blackwell.
56.
Paloma, M. and Garland, N. (1972) `The Married Professional Woman: A Study in the tolerance of Domestication', Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34, 531-539.
57.
Pollert, A. (1981) Girls, Wives Factory Lives, London: Macmillan.
58.
Presser, H. (1988) `Shift Work and Child Care among Young Dual Earner American parents', Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 133-148.
59.
Rapoport, R. and Rapoport, R. (1971) Dual Career Families, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
60.
Rapoport, R. and Rapoport, R. (1976) Dual Career Families Re Examined, New York: Harper and Row.
Seymour, J. (1992) `No Time To Call My Own: Women's Time as a Household Resource', Women's Studies International Forum, 15, 2, 187-192.
63.
Social Trends, 28 (1998) London: The Stationery Office.
64.
Tancred, P. (1995) `Women's Work: A Challenge to the Sociology of Work', Gender, Work and Organization, 2, 1, 11-20.
65.
Walby, S. (1990) Theorizing Patriarchy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
66.
Warde, A. and Hetherington, K. (1992) `A changing domestic division of labour? issues of measurement and interpretation', a paper presented for the 9th Annual Conference of the Labour Process, Manchester.
67.
White, L. and Keith, B. (1990) `The Effect of Shift Work on the Quality and Stability of Marital Relations', Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 453-462.
68.
Zmroczek, C. (1992) `Dirty Linen: Women, Class and Washing Machines, 1920's-1960's', Women's Studies International Forum, 15, 2, 173-185.
