The removal of state support for enterprises and the intensification of competition following the liberalisation of markets in the former state socialist societies of Eastern Europe were expected to result in the major rationalization of employment and work organisation, especially where ownership and control had changed. This study of 271 production workers in 13 Hungarian enterprises shows that the state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the most severe financial difficulties had reduced total employment the most in the early 1990s, and that both this group of companies and those now privately controlled had reduced the proportion of indirect support workers more than had SOEs in better financial conditions and/or which were still being supported by the state. Production workers in the private firms also had more varied jobs, especially skilled ones, and more task discretion than most of those in SOEs. In general, both the crisis SOEs and the private firms distinguished more strongly between skilled workers and team leaders and less-skilled workers in terms of the jobs they had, their discretion over task performance, supervisor control and involvement than did the more financially stable SOEs. Most workers in this last group of companies were still organised in the `quasi-Taylorised' work systems with substantial delegated autonomy from supervisors characteristic of state socialism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berend, I.T. (1990) The Hungarian Economic Reforms 1953-1988, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bonifert, D. (1987) A berszabalyozas. Hogyan Kezdodott? Hova jutott? Merre tart? [Wage Regulation. How it started? Where it got to? Where it goes to?], Budapest: Köozgazdasagi es Jogi Könyvkiadó.
3.
Bonin, J.P. and Schaffer, M.E. (1995) `Banks, Firms, Bad Debts and Bankruptcy in Hungary 1991-1994', London: CEPR Discussion Paper No. 234.
4.
Burawoy, M. and Lukacs, J. (1985) `Mythologies of Work: A Comparison of Firms in State Socialism and Advanced Capitalism', American Sociological Review, 50, 723-737.
5.
Burawoy, M. and Lukacs, J. (1992) The Radiant Past: Ideology and Reality in Hungary's Road to Capitalism, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
6.
Chang, H-J. and Nolan, P. (1995) `Europe versus Asia: Contrasting Paths to the Reform of Centrally Planned Systems of Political Economy' in H-J. Chang and P. Nolan (eds) The Transformation of the Commonest Economies, London: Macmillan, 3-45.
7.
Child, J. and L. Markoczy (1994) `Host Country Managerial Behaviour in Chinese and Hungarian Joint Ventures: assessment of competing explanations' in M. Boisot (ed.) East-West Business Collaboration, London: Routledge.
8.
Child, J., Markoczy, L. and Cheung, T. (1994) `Managerial Adaptation on Chinese and Hungarian Strategic Alliances with Culturally Distinct Foreign Partners', Advances in Chinese Industrial Studies, 4: 211-231.
9.
Chirot, D. (ed.) (1989) The Origins of Backwardness in Eastern Europe, Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Crawford, B. (ed.) (1995) Markets, States and Democracy, Boulder: Westview.
11.
Figyelo [Observer] (1995a) The Largest Hungarian Companies, Budapest: Figyelo.
12.
Figyelo (1995b) Berek es Juttatosok [Wages and Bonuses], Figyelo Supplement, 15 September, Budapest.
13.
Filtzer, D. (1992) `Economic Reform and Production Relations in Soviet Industry, 1986-90' in C. Smith and P. Thompson (eds) Labour in Transition, London: Routledge, 100-148.
14.
Good, D.F. (ed.) (1994) Economic Transformation in East and Central Europe, London: Routledge.
15.
Grancelli, B. (1995a) `Organizational Change: Towards a new East West Comparison', Organization Studies, 16, 1-26.
16.
Grancelli, B. (1995b) `Modernizing Post-Soviet Management: A comparative view' in B. Grancelli (ed.) Social Change and Modernization: Lessons from Eastern Europe, Berlin: de Gruyter.
17.
Henderson, J., R. Whitley, L. Czaban and G. Lengyel (1995) `Contention and Confusion in Industrial Transformation: Dilemmas of state economic management' in Dittrich E., Schmidt, G. and Whitley R. (eds) Industrial Transformation in Europe, London: Sage.
18.
Hethy, L. (1983) Gazdasagpolitika es erdekeltseg (Economic Policy and Interest), Budapest: Kossuth.
19.
Hethy, L. and Mako. C. (1989) Patterns of Workers' Behaviour and the Business Enterprise, Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
20.
Hitchens, D.W.M.N., Birnie, J.E., Hamar, J., Wagner, K. and Zemplinerova, A. (1995) Competitiveness of Industry in the Czech Republic and Hungary, Aldershot: Avebury.
21.
Horvath, L. (1977) `Uzemi demokracia es vallati strategia,' (Work Place Democracy and Company Strategy)Tarsadalmi Szemle, 9: 72-77.
22.
Hughes, S. (1994) `Of Monoliths and Magicians: Economic Transition and Industrial Relations in Hungary'Work, Employment and Society, 8: 69-86.
23.
Ishikawa, A. (1991) `Patterns of Work Identity in the Firm and Plant: An East-West Comparison' in G. Szell (ed.) Labour Relations in Transition in Eastern Europe, Berlin: de Gruyter.
24.
Jaklic, M. (1997) `Changing Governance Structures and Work Proganisation in Slovenia; in R. Whitley and P.H. Kristensen (eds), Governance at Work, OUP.
25.
Konecki, K. and Kulpinska, J. (1995) `Enterprise Transformation and the Redefinition of Organizational Values in Poland', in E. Dittrich, G. Schmidt and R. Whitely (eds) Institutional Legacies and Industrial Transformation in Europe, London: Sage.
26.
Kozminski, A.K. (1995) `From the Communist Nomenklatura to Transformational Leadership' in B. Grancelli (ed.) Social Change and Modernization, Berlin: de Gruyter.
27.
Lado, M. (1994) `Workers' and Employers' Interests-as they are represented in the changing industrial relations in Hungary', Krakow: University Council for Economic and Management Education Transfer Working Paper no. 3.
28.
Lincoln, J.R. and A.L. Kalleberg (1990) Culture, Control and Commitment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Mako, C. and P. Novaszath (1995) `Employment Relations in Multinational Companies: The Hungarian Case', in E. Dittrich, G. Schmidt and R. Whitley (eds) Industrial Transformation in Europe, London: Sage.
30.
Mako, C. and Simonyi, A. (1991) `Social Spaces and Acting Society' in G. Szell (ed.) Labour Relations in Transition in Eastern Europe, Berlin: de Gruyter.
31.
Mako, C. and Simonyi, A. (1995) `Participation at the Firm Level in the Transformation Process' in B. Grancelli (ed) Social Change and Modernization, Berlin: de Gruyter.
32.
Mickler, O. (1992) `Innovation and the Division of Labour in State Socialist and Capitalist Societies', in C. Smith and P. Thompson (eds) Labour in Transition, London: Routledge, 73-99.
33.
Myant, M. (1993) Transforming Socialist Economies, Aldershot: E. Elgar.
34.
Nagy, K. (1989) `New Technology and Work in Hungary: Technological innovation without organizational adaptation', in A. Francis and P. Grootings (eds) New Technologies and Work, London: Routledge.
35.
Perrow, C. (1967) `A Framework for Comparative Organizational Analysis', American Sociological Review, 16: 444-459.
36.
Stark, D. (1989) `Bending the Bars of the Iron Cage: bureaucratization and informalisation in capitalism and socialism', Sociological Forum, 4: 637-664.
37.
Whitley, R., Jaklic, M. and Hocevar, M. (1997) `Success Without Shock Therapy in Eastern Europe: the case of Slovenia', presented to an EMOT workshop on `Economic Performance Outcomes in Europe: the role of national institutions and forms of economic organisation', Berlin, January.
38.
Whitley, R. and Czaban, L. (1996) Institutional Transformation and Enterprise Change in an Emergent Capitalist Economy: The Case of Hungary, Manchester Business School Working Paper No. 341.
39.
Withey, M., Daft, R.L. and Cooper, WH. (1983) `Measures of Perrow's Work Unit Technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale,'Academy of Management Journal, 26: 45-63.
