There is a substantial body of writing that identifies efficiency advantages from the provision of employment security, both within individual plants and at the level of the national economy. However, the business cycle persists in capitalist economies, so the question arises: how do managements deal with the fluctuations in the demand for labour which are associated with it? That is to say, what are management policies with respect to external flexibility? In North America, segmenting jobs into stable and unstable ones is thought to have provided a solution; in Scandinavia, until recently, full employment policies were thought to have eliminated the problem. In this paper, we compare the policies with respect to employment security adopted in a sample of plants in three industries in Canada and Sweden. Our evidence suggests that policies with respect to external flexibility are influenced by the character of demand for what is being produced, by the technology of production, and by the institutional structure within which firms operate. Our evidence also indicates to what degree employment security is, itself, insecure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Althauser, R. P. (1989) `Job histories, career lines and firm internal labor markets: An analysis of job shifts', Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 8, 177-200.
2.
Aronson, R. L. (1950) Layoff Policies and Practices: Recent Experience Under Collective Bargaining, Princeton, New Jersey: Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics and Social Institutions, Princeton University.
3.
Arthurs, H. W., Carter, D. D. and Glasbeek, H. J. (1993) Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Canada (4th edition), Toronto: Butterworths.
4.
Averitt, R. T. (1968) The Dual Economy: The Dynamics of American Industrial Structure, New York: W. W. Norton.
5.
Bain, T. (1992) Banking the Furnace: Restructuring of the Steel Industry in Eight Countries, Kalamazoo, Michigan: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
6.
Baron, J. N., Davis-Blake, A. and Bielby, W. T. (1986) `The structure of opportunity: How Promotion ladders vary within and among organizations', Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 248-273.
7.
Bills, D. B. (1992) `A survey of employer surveys: What we know about labor markets from talking with bosses', Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 11, 3-31.
8.
Birecree, A. (1993) `Corporate development, structural change, and strategic choice: Bargaining at International Paper Company in the 1980s', Industrial Relations, 32, 343-366.
9.
Block, F. (1990) Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse, Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Bridges, W. P. and Nelson, R. L. (1989) `Markets in hierarchies: Organizational and market influences on gender inequality in a state pay system', American Journal of Sociology, 95, 616-658.
11.
Cohen, Y. and Pfeffer, J. (1986) `Organizational hiring standards,'Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 1-24.
12.
Coverdill, J. (1988) `The dual economy and sex differences in earnings', Social Forces, 66, 970-993.
13.
Davies, K. and Esseveld, J. (1989) `Factory work, redundancy and the search for work: Toward a reconceptualization of employment and unemployment', Sociological Review, 37, 219-252.
14.
Davis-Blake, A. and Uzzi, B. (1993) `Determinants of employment externalization: A study of temporary workers and independent contractors', Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 195-223.
15.
Doeringer, P. (1992) `Flexibility and equity: the American experience' in R. S. Belous, R. S. Hartley and K. L. McClenahan (eds.) European and American Labor Markets: Different Models and Different Results, Washington, DC: National Planning Association, 63-71.
16.
Economic Council of Canada (1976) People and Jobs: A Study of the Canadian Labour Market, Ottawa: Information Canada.
17.
Eliasson, G. (1992) Arbetet: dess betydelse, dess innehdll, dess kvalitet och dess ersattning, Stockholm: Industriens Utredninsinstitut.
18.
Fligstein, N., Hicks, A. and Morgan, S. P. (1983) `Toward a theory of income determination', Work and Occupations, 10, 289-396.
19.
Gordon, A. (1984) Redundancy in the 1980s: The Take-Up of Voluntary Schemes, Aldershot, Hampshire: Gower.
20.
Hodson, R. and Kaufman, R. L. (1982) `Economic dualism: A critical review', American Sociological Review, 47, 728-739.
21.
Holyoke, L., Alexander, K. L. and Albor, T. (1994) `Psst Wanna buy a used steel plant?'Business Week, August 22nd, 48-49.
22.
Johannesson, J. (1987) Labour Market Policy and Labour Market Dynamics: The Swedish Case, Stockholm: EFA.
23.
Johansson, L. (1990) Structural Change in Canada and Sweden: A Look at the Evolution in Three Industries, Umea: Sociologiska institutionen, Umeat Universite.
24.
Lewin, L. (1992) Samhdllet Och de Organiserade Intressna, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
25.
Mangum, G., Mayall, D. and Nelson, K. (1985) `The temporary help industry: A response to the dual internal labor market', Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38, 599-611.
26.
Masi, A. C. (1991) `Structural adjustment and technological change in the Canadian steel industry, 1970-1986' in D. Drache and M. S. Gertler (eds.) The New Era of Global Competition, Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 181-205.
27.
Masi, C. (1992) `Migration and job mobility: Some contemporary lessons from Sidney Goldstein's Patterns of Mobility', in C. Goldscheider (ed.) Migration, Population Structure, and Redistribution Policies, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 33-60.
28.
McKersie, R. B. and Sengenberger, W. (1983) Job Losses in Major Industries: Manpower Strategy Responses, Paris: OECD.
29.
Miller, G. J. (1992) Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
O'Connor, J. (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St. Martin's Press.
31.
Offe, C. (1990) Disorganized Capitalism, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
32.
Osberg, L. (1988) `Distributional issues and the future of the welfare state' in K. Newton, T. Schweitzer and J-P. Voyer (eds.) Perspective 2000: Proceedings of a Conference Sponsored by the Economic Council of Canada, Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, 159-174.
33.
Osberg, L., Mazany, R. L., Apostle, R. and Clairmont, D. (1986) `Job mobility, wage determination and market segmentation in the presence of sample selection bias`, Canadian Journal of Economics, 19, 319-346.
34.
Osterman, P. (1988) Employment Futures: Reorganization, Dislocation, and Public Policy, New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Parcel, T. L. and Sickmeier, M. B. (1988) `One firm, two labor markets: The case of McDonald's in the fast-food industry', Sociological Quarterly, 29, 29-46.
36.
Parsons, D. O. (1986) `The employment relationship: Job attachment, work effort, and the nature of contracts' in O. Ashenfelter and R Layard (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 2, North Holland: Elsevier, 789-848.
37.
Penn, R. (1990) Class, Power and Technology: Skilled Workers in Britain and America, New York: St. Martin's Press.
38.
Penn, R., Lilja, K. and Scattergood, H. (1992) `Flexibility and employment patterns in the contemporary paper industry: A comparative analysis of mills in Britain and Finland', Industrial Relations Journal, 23, 214-223.
39.
Penn, R. and Scattergood, H. (1985) `Deskilling or enskilling?: An empirical investigation of recent theories of the labour process', British Journal of Sociology, 36, 611-630.
40.
Penn, R. and Wigzell, B. (1987) `The attitudes and responses of trades unions to technical change: A case study of maintenance workers in the North West of England', Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 2, 3-22.
41.
Pentland, H.C. (1959) `The development of a capitalistic labour market in Canada', Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 25, 450-461.
42.
Pfeffer, J. and Cohen, Y. (1984) `Determinants of internal labor markets in organizations', Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 550-572.
43.
Simons, H. (1948) Economic Policy for a Free Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Smith, M. R. (1992) Power, Norms, and Inflation: A Skeptical Treatment, New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
45.
Streeck, W. (1992) `Flexibility and equity: A European example' in R.S. Belous, R.S. Hartley and K.L. McClenahan (eds.) European and American Labor Markets: Different Models and Different Results, Washington, DC: National Planning Association, 72-76.
46.
Teeple, G. (1972) `Land, labour, and capital in pre-Confederation Canada', in G. Teeple (ed.) Capitalism and the National Question in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 43-66.
47.
Therborn, G. (1986) Why Some Peoples are More Unemployed than Others, London: Verso.
48.
Tigges, L. M. (1987) Changing Fortunes: Industrial Sectors and Workers'Earnings, New York: Praeger.
49.
Tigges, L. M. (1988) `Age, earnings and change within the dual economy', Social Forces, 66, 676-698.
50.
Weakleim, D. L. and Frenkel, S. J. (1993) `Work discipline in contemporary capitalism: A test of efficiency wage theories', Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 12, 83-110.
51.
Wijkman, P. M. (1987) `Comments' in P. Bosworth and A. M. Rivlin (eds.) The Swedish Economy, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 92-96.
52.
Zagorski, K. (1987) `Work Rewards and Labour Segmentation: The Australian Case', Work, Employment and Society, 2, 2, 229-246.
53.
Zucker, L. and Rosenstein, C. (1981) `Taxonomies of institutional structure: Dual economy reconsidered', American Sociological Review, 46, 869-884.
