Despite considerable refinement in scientific concepts of skill, common sense concepts of skill prevail in the workplace. This paper examines common sense notions of skill and craft in United States building construction workplaces, focusing on the informal designations of construction labour (the `good craftsman,' `specialist,' and `jack-of-all-trades and master-of-none') and formal designations of union and non-union labour, using data drawn from empirical investigation. This skill ideology is examined for its role in social closure as well as contradictory aspects that may undermine collective interests. Further research on ideological discourses justifying pay, power and privilege is called for.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applebaum, H.A. (1991) Royal blue: The culture of construction workers, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2.
Attewell, P. (1990) `What is skill?'Work and Occupations, 17, 422-448.
3.
Bourdon, C. and Levitt, R.E. (1980) Union and open-shop construction, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
4.
Braverman, H. (1974) Labor and monopoly capital, New York: Monthly Review Press.
5.
Cockburn, C. (1983) Brothers: Male dominance and technological change, London: Pluto Press.
6.
Eccles, R.G. (1981) `Bureaucratic versus craft administration: the relationship of market structure to the construction firm', Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 449-469.
7.
Edwards, R. (1979) Contested Terrain, New York: Basic Books.
8.
Engineering News Record (1990), Editorial, March 10.
9.
Foster, H.G. (1970) `Nonapprentice sources of training in construction', Monthly Labor Review, February, 21-26.
10.
Gouldner, A. (1978) `The new class project, I', Theory and Society, 6, 153-204.
11.
Krizan, W. (1990) `ABC has big plans for foundations', Engineering News Record, March 10.
12.
Kusterer, K. (1978) Workplace knowhow: The important knowledge of unskilled workers, Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Maloney, W.F. and McFillan, J.M. (1984) Unionized construction workers and their work environment, The University of Michigan: Center for Construction Engineering and Management.
14.
More, C. (1980) Skill and the English working class, 1870-1914, London: Croom Helm.
15.
Phillips, A. and Taylor, B. (1980) `Sex and skill', Feminist Review, 6, 79-88.
16.
Reckman, B. (1979) `Carpentry: The craft and trade', in A. Zimbalist (ed.) Case Studies on the Labor Process, New York: Monthly Review Press, 73-103.
17.
Riemer, J.W. (1977) Hard hats: The working world of construction workers, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Silver, M.L. (1986) Under construction: Work and alienation in the building trades, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
19.
Smith, C. (1987) Technical Workers: Class, Labour and Trade Unionism, London: Macmillan.
20.
Spenner, K.I. (1990) `Skill: Meanings, methods, and measures', Work and Occupations, 17, 399-421.
21.
Steiger, T.L. (1988) Working construction: Organization and control of the labor process. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
22.
Steiger, T.L. and Form, W. (1991) `The labor process in construction: accomplishing control without bureaucratic and technological means?'Work and Occupations, 18, 251-270.
23.
Steinberg, R.J. (1990) `Social construction of skill: Gender, power, and comparable worth', Work and Occupations, 17, 449-482.
24.
Vallas, S.P. (1990) `The concept of skill: A critical review', Work and Occupations, 17, 379-398.
25.
Vallas, S.P. (1991) `Workers, firms, and the dominant ideology: Hegemony and consciousness in the monopoly core', Sociological Quarterly, 32, 61-83.
26.
Wajcman, J. (1991) `Patriarchy, technology, and conceptions of skill', Work and Occupations, 18, 29-45.
