Conceptualizing Responsible Return to Work: Corporate Social Responsibility in Relation to Employee Return to Work after Cancer

Abstract

Demographic change, improvements in medical screening and treatment, evolving patterns of work, and eroding social security systems are contributing to greater numbers of seriously and chronically ill employees within the workforce. This study builds upon research in Corporate Social Responsibility and return to work (RTW) to conceptualize responsible return to work (RRTW). The study draws upon first-hand accounts of Australian women breast cancer survivors to inductively theorize the factors influencing RRTW practices. RTW practices that accommodate illness as required by law and regulation are found to be insufficient to meet employees’ needs and expectations and significant challenges for RTW are caused by this frame of reference and the distinction between medically certificated and non-medically certificated leave. Interactions between the economic case for creating mutual benefit through cooperation between employer and employee and the moral case for on-going tailored workplace adaptations as part of RRTW are critically evaluated.

Keywords

Australia cancer Corporate Social Responsibility return to work

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alberti

Bessa

Hardy

, et al. (2018) In, against and beyond precarity: work in insecure times. Work, Employment and Society 32(3): 447–457.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2017) Cancer in Australia. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/3da1f3c2-30f0-4475-8aed-1f19f8e16d48/20066-cancer-2017.pdf.aspx?inline=true (accessed 12 October 2020).

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2019) Cancer data in Australia. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia (accessed 12 October 2020).

Barry

(2017) In Australia, land of the ‘fair go’, not everyone gets an equal slice of the pie. The Conversation, 27 January. Available at: https://theconversation.com/in-australia-land-of-the-fair-go-not-everyone-gets-an-equal-slice-of-the-pie-70480 (accessed 12 October 2020).

Bellaby

(2019) Sick from Work: The Body in Employment. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.

Bowman

McGann

Kimberley

, et al. (2017) ‘Rusty, invisible and threatening’: ageing, capital and employability. Work, Employment and Society 31(3): 465–482.

Brandth

Kvande

(2015) Fathers and flexible parental leave. Work, Employment and Society 30(2): 275–290.

Breast Cancer Network Australia (2019) Current breast cancer statistics in Australia. Available at: https://www.bcna.org.au/media/7111/bcna-2019-current-breast-cancer-statistics-in-australia-11jan2019.pdf (accessed 12 October 2020).

Cancer Council (2019) Cancer, work & you: A guide for people with cancer, their families and friends, November. Available at: https://www.cancercouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Cancer-Work-You_Dec2019.pdf (accessed 12 October 2020).

10.

Carroll

(1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4): 497–505.

11.

Chan

Silva

Copeland

, et al. (2009) Workplace accommodations. In: Feuerstein

(ed.) Work and Cancer Survivors. New York: Springer, 233–254.

12.

Charmaz

(2010) Disclosing illness and disability in the workplace. Journal of International Education in Business 3(1/2): 6–19.

13.

Clarkson

(1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92–117.

14.

Dacin

Munir

Tracey

(2010) Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal 53(6): 1393–1418.

15.

Dahlsrud

(2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15(1): 1–13.

16.

De Boer

Taskila

Ojajärvi

, et al. (2009) Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Journal of the American Medical Association 301(7): 753–762.

17.

Dingemans

Henkens

van Solinge

(2017) Working retirees in Europe: individual and societal determinants. Work, Employment and Society 31(6): 972–991.

18.

Duijts

van Egmond

Spelten

, et al. (2014) Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology 23(5): 481–492.

19.

Dutton

Workman

Hardin

(2014) Compassion at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1: 277–304.

20.

Fair Work Ombudsman (2020) Long periods of sick leave. Available at: https://www.fairwork.gov.au/leave/sick-and-carers-leave/long-periods-of-sick-leave (accessed 12 October 2020).

21.

Foster

(2007) Legal obligation or personal lottery? Employee experiences of disability and the negotiation of adjustments in the public sector workplace. Work, Employment and Society 21(1): 67–84.

22.

Foster

(2018) The health and well-being at work agenda: good news for (disabled) workers or just a capital idea? Work, Employment and Society 32(1): 186–197.

23.

Foweraker

Cutcher

(2020) An ageless gift: reciprocity and value creation by and for older workers. Work, Employment and Society 34(4): 533–549.

24.

Garrow

(2016) Presenteeism: a review of current thinking. Institute for Employment Studies, February. Available at: https://www.employment-studies.co.uk/resource/presenteeism-review-current-thinking (accessed 12 October 2020).

25.

Gilfillan

(2018) Characteristics and use of casual employees in Australia. Parliament of Australia, 19 January. Available at: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/library/prspub/5742396/upload_binary/5742396.pdf (accessed 12 October 2020).

26.

Gioia

Corley

Hamilton

(2012) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods 16(1): 15–31.

27.

Harvey

(2019) Corporate wellness: what, why not and whither? Employee Relations: The International Journal 41(4): 638–648.

28.

Islam

Dahlui

Majid

, et al. (2014) Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 14(3): S8.

29.

Jones

Newman

Shao

, et al. (2019) Advances in employee-focused micro-level research on corporate social responsibility: situating new contributions within the current state of the literature. Journal of Business Ethics 157(2): 293–302.

30.

Kalfa

Koelmeyer

Taksa

, et al. (2019) Work experiences of Australian cancer survivors with lymphoedema: a qualitative study. Health & Social Care in the Community 27(4): 848–855.

31.

Kennedy

Haslam

Munir

, et al. (2007) Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care 16(1): 17–25.

32.

Kirk-Brown

Van Dijk

(2016) An examination of the role of psychological safety in the relationship between job resources, affective commitment and turnover intentions of Australian employees with chronic illness. International Journal of Human Resource Management 27(14): 1626–1641.

33.

Knox

(2018) Employee volunteer programs are associated with firm-level benefits and CEO incentives: data on the ethical dilemma of corporate social responsibility activities. Journal of Business Ethics 162(2): 449–472.

34.

Koolhaas

van der Klink

JJL

de Boer

, et al. (2014) Chronic health conditions and workability in the ageing workforce: the impact of work conditions, psychosocial factors and perceived health. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 87(4): 433–443.

35.

Lewchuk

Clarke

De Wolff

(2008) Working without commitments: precarious employment and health. Work, Employment and Society 22(3): 387–406.

36.

McGonagle

Barnes-Farrell

(2013) Chronic illness in the workplace: stigma, identity threat and strain. Stress and Health 30(4): 310–321.

37.

Mehnert

de Boer

Feuerstein

(2013) Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer 119(S11): 2151–2159.

38.

Munir

Yarker

Haslam

(2008) Sickness absence management: encouraging attendance or ‘risk-taking’ presenteeism in employees with chronic illness? Disability and Rehabilitation 30(19): 1461–1472.

39.

Poblete

(2018) Informality, precarious work and new approaches to complex realities. Work, Employment and Society 32(5): 967–970.

40.

Randle

Hardy

(2017) Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work. Work, Employment and Society 31(3): 447–464.

41.

Roelen

Koopmans

van Rhenen

, et al. (2011) Trends in return to work of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 128(1): 237–242.

42.

Rubery

Grimshaw

Keizer

, et al. (2018) Challenges and contradictions in the ‘normalising’ of precarious work. Work, Employment and Society 32(3): 509–527.

43.

Rupp

Ganapathi

Aguilera

, et al. (2006) Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27(4): 537–543.

44.

Safe Work Australia (2019) National return to work strategy 2020–2030, September. Available at: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1909/national_return_to_work_strategy_2020-2030.pdf (accessed 12 October 2020).

45.

Social Research Centre (2018) National return to work survey 2018 summary report, 23 October. Available at: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1811/national-rtw-survey-2018-summary-report.pdf (accessed 12 October 2020).

46.

Spedale

(2019) Deconstructing the ‘older worker’: exploring the complexities of subject positioning at the intersection of multiple discourses. Organization 26(1): 38–54.

47.

Spelten

Sprangers

Verbeek

(2002) Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology 11(2): 124–131.

48.

Stergiou-Kita

Pritlove

Kirsh

(2016) The ‘Big C’-stigma, cancer, and workplace discrimination. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice 10(6): 1035–1050.

49.

Strive Philanthropy (2019) Giving large: 2019 report. Available at: https://strivephilanthropy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GivingLarge-Report-2019.pdf (accessed 12 October 2020).

50.

Taylor

Cunningham

Newsome

, et al. (2010) ‘Too scared to go sick’ – reformulating the research agenda on sickness absence. Industrial Relations Journal 41(4): 270–288.

51.

Vijayasingha

Jogulu

Allotey

(2018) Enriching the organizational context of chronic illness experience through an ethics of care perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 153(1): 29–40.

52.

Voegtlin

Greenwood

(2016) Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: a systematic review and conceptual analysis. Human Resource Management Review 26(3): 181–197.

53.

Whitman

(2014) Looking out for the ‘Aussie Bloke’: gender, class and contextualizing a hegemony of working-class masculinities in Australia. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Adelaide, Australia.

54.

Williams

Richardson

Draper

(2018) A beginning and not the end: work after a diagnosis of dementia. Work, Employment and Society 32(1): 219–229.

55.

Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) (2020) Gender workplace statistics at a glance 2020, 20 February. Available at: https://www.wgea.gov.au/data/fact-sheets/gender-workplace-statistics-at-a-glance (accessed 12 October 2020).