This qualitative case study adopts a labour process analysis to unpack the distinctive features of capital’s control regimes in the food-delivery segment of the Australian platform-economy and assesses labour agency in response to these. Drawing upon worker experiences with the Deliveroo and UberEATS platforms, it is shown how the labour process controls are multi-facetted and more than algorithmic management, with three distinct features standing out: the panoptic disposition of the technological infrastructure, the use of information asymmetries to constrain worker choice, and the obfuscated nature of their performance management systems. Combined with the workers’ precarious labour market positions and the Australian political-economic context, only limited, mainly individual, expressions of agency were found.
AndersonB (2010) Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society24(2): 300–317.
2.
AneeshA (2009) Global labor: Algocratic modes of organization. Sociological Theory27(4): 347–370.
3.
AuerbachCSilversteinLB (2003) Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York: NYU Press.
4.
BiernackiPWaldorfD (1981) Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research10(2): 141–163.
5.
BorehamPParkerRThompsonP, et al. (2007) New Technology @ Work. London: Routledge.
6.
BravermanH (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
7.
BurawoyM (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BurawoyM (1983) Between the labor process and the state: The changing face of factory regimes under advanced capitalism. American Sociological Review48(5): 587–605.
9.
CallaghanGThompsonP (2001) Edwards revisited: Technical control and call centres. Economic and Industrial Democracy22(1): 13–37.
10.
CherryMA (2016) Beyond misclassification: The digital transformation of work. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal37(3): 577–602.
11.
CoeNM (2013) Geographies of production III: Making space for labour. Progress in Human Geography37(2): 271–284.
12.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
De StefanoV (2016) The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the ‘gig-economy’. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal37(2): 471–504.
16.
EdwardsPK (1990) Understanding conflict in the labour process: The logic and autonomy of struggle. In: KnightsDWillmottH (eds) Labour Process Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 125–152.
17.
EdwardsRC (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.
18.
ElliottCSLongG (2016) Manufacturing rate busters: Computer control and social relations in the labour process. Work, Employment and Society30(1): 135–151.
19.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(1): 80–92.
20.
FinkinM (2016) Beclouded work, beclouded workers in historical perspective. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal37(3): 603–618.
21.
FordeCStuartMJoyceS, et al. (2017) The social protection of workers in the collaborative economy. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, European Parliament, Brussels, November.
22.
FrenkelSKorczynskiMDonoghueL, et al. (1995) Re-constituting work: Trends towards knowledge work and info-normative control. Work, Employment and Society9(4): 773–796.
23.
FriedmanAL (1977) Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism. London: Macmillan.
24.
GalvánJLÁ (2012) Good or bad jobs?: Contrasting workers’ expectations and jobs in Mexican call centres. In: WarhurstCCarréFFindlayP, et al. (eds) Are Bad Jobs Inevitable? Trends, Determinants and Responses to Job Quality in the Twenty-First Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 160–175.
25.
GandiniA (2018) Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print 18 September. DOI: 10.1177/0018726718790002.
26.
GoodsCVeenABarrattT (2019) ‘Is your gig any good’ Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. Journal of Industrial Relations. Epub ahead of print 1 February. DOI: 10.1177/0022185618817069.
27.
HallR (2010) Renewing and revising the engagement between labour process theory and technology. In: ThompsonPSmithC (eds) Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis. London: Palgrave, 159–181.
28.
HowcroftDBergvall-KårebornB (2019) A typology of crowdwork platforms. Work, Employment and Society33(1): 21–38.
29.
JamesN (1989) Emotional labour: Skill and work in the social regulation of feelings. The Sociological Review37(1): 15–42.
30.
JarosS (2010) The core theory: Critiques, defences and advances. In: ThompsonPSmithC (eds) Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis. London: Palgrave, 70–90.
31.
JohnstonHLand-KazlauskasC (2018) Organizing On-Demand: Representation, Voice, and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy. Geneva: ILO.
32.
KatzC (2004) Growing Up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s Everyday Lives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
KenneyMZysmanJ (2016) The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology32(3): 61–69.
34.
LapavitsasC (2011) Theorizing financialization. Work, Employment and Society25(4): 611–626.
35.
LeeMKKusbitDMetskyE, et al. (2015) Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 1603–1612.
36.
OliverDYuS (2018) The Australian labour market in 2017. Journal of Industrial Relations60(3): 298–316.
37.
Peticca-HarrisAde GamaNRavishankarMN (2018) Postcapitalist precarious work and those in the ‘drivers’ seat: Exploring the motivations and lived experiences of Uber drivers in Canada. Organization. Epub ahead of print 28 February. DOI: 10.1177/1350508418757332.
38.
PuranamPAlexyOReitzigM (2014) What’s ‘new’ about new forms of organizing?Academy of Management Review39(2): 162–180.
39.
RosenblatAStarkL (2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication10: 3758–3784.
40.
RuberyJGrimshawDKeizerA, et al. (2018) Challenges and contradictions in the ‘normalising’ of precarious work. Work, Employment and Society32(3): 509–527.
SchildtH (2017) Big data and organizational design – The brave new world of algorithmic management and computer augmented transparency. Innovation19(1): 23–30.
StandingG (2016) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
48.
StewartAStanfordJ (2017) Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?The Economic and Labour Relations Review28(3): 420–437.
49.
ThompsonP (1990) Crawling from the wreckage: The labour process and the politics of production. In: KnightsDWillmottH (eds) Labour Process Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 95–124.
50.
ThompsonPHarleyB (2008) HRM and the worker: Labor process perspectives. In: BoxallPPurcellJWrightPM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 148–165.
51.
ThompsonPSmithC (2009) Labour power and labour process: Contesting the marginality of the sociology of work. Sociology43(5): 913–930.
52.
ThompsonPvan den BroekD (2010) Managerial control and workplace regimes: An introduction. Work, Employment and Society24(3): 1–12.
WeilD (2014) The Fissured Workplace: Why Work Became So Bad for So Many and What Can Be Done to Improve It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
WoodAJGrahamMLehdonvirtaV, et al. (2018) Good gig, bad big: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society33(1): 56–75.
57.
WoodcockJJohnsonMR (2018) Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review66(3): 542–558.
58.
YinRK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
59.
ZwickA (2018) Welcome to the gig economy: Neoliberal industrial relations and the case of Uber. GeoJournal83(4): 679–691.
