Parenthood contributes substantially to broader gender wage inequality. The intensification of gendered divisions of paid and unpaid work after the birth of a child create unequal constraints and expectations such that, all else equal, mothers earn less than childless women, but fathers earn a wage premium. The fatherhood wage premium, however, varies substantially among men. Analyses of linked workplace-employee data from Canada reveal how organizational context conditions educational, occupational and family-status variation in fatherhood premiums. More formal employment relations (collective bargaining and human resource departments) reduce both overall fatherhood premiums and group differences in them, while performance pay systems (merit and incentive pay) have mixed effects. Shifting entrenched gendered divisions of household labour is thus not the only pathway to minimizing fathers’ wage advantage.
AckerJ (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4(2): 139–158.
2.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society20(4): 441–464.
3.
AndersonCTomaskovic-DeveyD (1995) Patriarchal pressures: an exploration of organizational processes that exacerbate and erode gender earnings inequality. Work and Occupations22(3): 328–356.
4.
Avent-HoltDTomaskovic-DeveyD (2010) The relational basis of inequality: generic and contingent wage distribution processes. Work and Occupations37(2): 162–193.
5.
Avent-HoltDTomaskovic-DeveyD (2014) A relational theory of earnings inequality. American Behavioral Scientist58(3): 379–399.
6.
BaronJNBielbyWT (1980) Bringing the firms back in: stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work. American Sociological Review45(5): 737–765.
7.
BaronJNHannanMTHsuFKoçakÖ (2007) In the company of women: gender inequality and the logic of bureaucracy in start-up firms. Work and Occupations34(1): 35–66.
8.
BeckerGS (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BidwellMBriscoeFFernandez-MateoISterlingA (2013) The employment relationship and inequality: how and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals7(1): 61–121.
10.
BygrenMErlandssonAGählerM (2017) Do employers prefer fathers? Evidence from a field experiment testing the gender by parenthood interaction effect on callbacks to job applications. European Sociological Review33(3): 337–348.
11.
CanayIA (2011) A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. The Econometrics Journal14(3): 368–386.
12.
CardDLemieuxTRiddellWC (2003) Unions and the wage structure. In: AddisonTSchnabelC (eds) The International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 246–292.
13.
CastillaE (2008) Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology113(6): 1479–1526.
14.
CastillaEBenardS (2010) The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly55(4): 543–576.
15.
ConnellRW (1987) Gender and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
CookeLP (2014) Gendered parenthood penalties and premiums across the earnings distribution in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. European Sociological Review30(3): 360–372.
17.
CookeLPFullerS (in press) Class differences in establishment pathways to fatherhood wage premiums. Journal of Marriage and Family.
18.
CorrellSJBenardSPaikI (2007) Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology112(5): 1297–1338.
19.
DiTomasoNSmithCSmithDRFarrisGFCorderoR (2007) Effects of structural position on allocation and evaluation decision for scientists and engineers. Administrative Science Quarterly52(2): 175–207.
20.
DobbinF (2009) Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
ElviraMMGrahamME (2002) Not just a formality: pay system formalization and sex-related earnings effects. Organization Science13(6): 601–618.
22.
ElviraMMZatzickM (2002) Who’s displaced first? The role of race in layoff decisions. Industrial Relations41(2): 329–361.
FangTHeywoodJS (2006) Output pay and ethnic wage differentials: Canadian evidence. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society45(2): 173–194.
25.
FangTHeywoodJS (2010) Immigration, ethnic wage differentials and output pay in Canada. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(1): 109–130.
26.
FreemanRB (1980) Unionism and the dispersion of wages. ILR Review34(1): 3–23.
27.
FullerS (2017) Segregation across workplaces and the motherhood wage gap: why do mothers work in low-wage establishments?Social Forces. Epub ahead of print 8December. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sox087.
28.
GlauberR (2008) Race and gender in families and at work: the fatherhood premium. Gender & Society22(1): 8–30.
29.
HeinzeAWolfE (2010) The intra-firm gender wage gap: a new view on wage differentials based on linked employer–employee data. Journal of Population Economics23(3): 851–879.
30.
HeywoodJSO’HalloranPL (2005) Racial earnings differentials and performance pay. Journal of Human Resources40(2): 435–452.
31.
HeywoodJSParentD (2012) Performance pay and the white–black wage gap. Journal of Labor Economics30(2): 249–290.
32.
HeywoodJSParentDJ (2017) Performance pay, the gender gap, and specialization within marriage. Journal of Labor Research38: 387–427.
33.
HodgesMJBudigMJ (2010) Who gets the daddy bonus? Organizational hegemonic masculinity and the impact of fatherhood on earnings. Gender & Society24(6): 717–745.
34.
JavdaniM (2015) Glass ceilings or glass doors? The role of firms in male-female wage disparities. Canadian Journal of Economics48(2): 529–560.
35.
JirjahnUStephanG (2004) Gender, piece rates and wages: evidence from matched employer-employee data. Cambridge Journal of Economics28: 683–704.
36.
KalevA (2014) How you downsize is who you downsize: biased formalization, accountability, and managerial diversity. American Sociological Review79(1): 109–135.
KaufmanG (2014) Superdads: How Fathers Balance Work and Family in the 21st Century. New York: New York University Press.
39.
KillewaldA (2013) A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: marriage, coresidence, biology and fathers’ wages. American Sociological Review78(1): 96–116.
40.
KillewaldAGarcia-ManglanoJ (2016) Tethered lives: a couple-based perspective on the consequences of parenthood for time use, occupation, and wages. Social Science Research60: 266–282.
41.
KmecA (2011) Are motherhood penalties and fatherhood bonuses warranted? Comparing pro-work behaviors and conditions of mothers, fathers, and non-parents. Social Science Research40(2): 444–459.
42.
KraigerKFordJK (1985) A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology70(1): 56–65.
43.
LemieuxTMcLeodWBParentD (2009) Performance pay and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics124(1): 1–49.
44.
LoughranDSZissimopoulosJM (2009) Why wait? The effect of marriage and childbearing on the wages of men and women. The Journal of Human Resources44(2): 326–349.
45.
LundbergSRoseE (2000) Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics7(6): 689–710.
46.
MaddenJF (2012) Performance-support bias and the gender pay gap among stockbrokers. Gender & Society26(3): 488–518.
47.
MaddenJFVekkerA (2017) Output-based performance pay, performance-support bias, and the racial pay gap within a large retail stock brokerage. Industrial Relations56(4): 662–687.
48.
NelsonRRBridgesWP (1999) Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets and Unequal Pay for Women in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
PercheskiCWildemanC (2008) Becoming a dad: employment trajectories of married, cohabiting and nonresident fathers. Social Science Quarterly89(2): 482–501.
50.
PetersenTPennerAMHøgsnesG (2011) The male marital wage premium: sorting vs. differential pay. ILR Review64(2): 283–304.
51.
PetersenTPennerAMHøgnesG (2014) From motherhood penalties to husband premiums: the new challenge for gender equality and family policy, lessons from Norway. American Journal of Sociology119(5): 1434–1472.
52.
ReskinBF (2000) The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology29(2): 319–328.
53.
ReskinBFMcBrierDB (2000) Why not ascription? Organizations’ employment of male and female managers. American Sociological Review65(2): 210–233.
54.
RidgewayCL (2014) Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review79(1): 1–16.
55.
RidgewayCLCorrellSJ (2004) Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues60(4): 683–700.
56.
RothPLHuffcuttAIBobkoP (2003) Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: a new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology88(4): 694–706.
57.
Smith KoslowskiA (2011) Working fathers in Europe: earning and caring. European Sociological Review27(2): 230–245.
58.
StainbackKTomaskovic-DeveyDSkaggsS (2010) Organizational approaches to inequality: inertia, relative power, and environments. Annual Review of Sociology36: 225–247.
TillyC (1998) Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
61.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDAvent-HoltDZimmerCHardingS (2009) The categorical generation of organizational inequality: a comparative test of Tilly’s durable inequality. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility27(3): 128–142.
62.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDHällstenMAvent-HoltD (2015) Where do immigrants fare worse? Modeling workplace wage gap variation with longitudinal employer-employee data. American Journal of Sociology120(4): 1095–1143.
WilliamsJ (2000) Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
WilliamsJBlair-LoyMBerdahlJL (2013) Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues69(2): 209–234.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
