Analyses relying on two international surveys from over 100,000 men and women across 29 countries explore the relationship between maternal employment and adult daughters’ and sons’ employment and domestic outcomes. In the employment sphere, adult daughters, but not sons, of employed mothers are more likely to be employed and, if employed, are more likely to hold supervisory responsibility, work more hours and earn higher incomes than their peers whose mothers were not employed. In the domestic sphere, sons raised by employed mothers spend more time caring for family members and daughters spend less time on housework. Analyses provide evidence for two mechanisms: gender attitudes and social learning. Finally, findings show contextual influences at the family and societal levels: family-of-origin social class moderates effects of maternal employment and childhood exposure to female employment within society can substitute for the influence of maternal employment on daughters and reinforce its influence on sons.
AngristJDPischkeJ-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BanduraA (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BasowSAHoweKG (1979) Model influence on career choices of college students. Vocational Guidance Quarterly27(3): 239–243.
4.
BeamanLDufloEPandeRTopalovaP (2012) Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science335(6068): 582–586.
5.
BellerE (2009) Bringing intergenerational social mobility research into the twenty-first century: why mothers matter. American Sociological Review74(4): 507–528.
6.
BettingerEHægelandTRegeM (2014) Home with mom: the effects of stay-at-home parents on children’s long-run educational outcomes. Journal of Labor Economics32(3): 443–467.
7.
BianchiSM (2000) Maternal employment and time with children: dramatic change or surprising continuity?Demography37(4): 401–414.
8.
BittmanMEnglandPSayerLFolbreNMathesonG (2003) When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology109(1): 186–214.
9.
BoydM (1985) Ascription and Achievement: Studies in Mobility and Status Attainment in Canada (No. 133). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Carleton University Press.
10.
BreenRJonssonJO (2005) Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology31: 223–243.
11.
BudigMMisraJBoeckmannI (2012) The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: the importance of work–family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics19(2): 163–193.
12.
CampbellDEWolbrechtC (2006) See Jane run: women politicians as role models for adolescents. Journal of Politics68(2): 233–247.
13.
CarmichaelF (2000) Intergenerational mobility and occupational status in Britain. Applied Economics Letters7(6): 391–396.
14.
CarneiroPLøkenKVSalvanesKG (2015) A flying start? Maternity leave benefits and long-run outcomes of children. Journal of Political Economy123(2): 365–412.
15.
CorrigallEAKonradAM (2007) Gender role attitudes and careers: a longitudinal study. Sex Roles56(11–12): 847–855.
16.
CunninghamM (2001) Parental influences on the gendered division of housework. American Sociological Review66(2): 184–203.
17.
DavisSNGreensteinTN (2009) Gender ideology: components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology35: 87–105.
18.
DavisSNWillsJB (2010) Adolescent gender ideology socialization: direct and moderating effects of fathers’ beliefs. Sociological Spectrum30(5): 580–604.
19.
DiPietroGUrwinP (2003) Intergenerational mobility and occupational status in Italy. Applied Economics Letters10(12): 793–797.
20.
DottiSGiuliaMSchererS (2018) Maternal employment: enabling factors in context. Work, Employment and Society32(1): 75–92.
21.
DunifonRHansenATNicholsonSNielsenLP (2013) The Effect of Maternal Employment on Children’s Academic Performance. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
DustmannCSchönbergU (2012) Expansions in maternity leave coverage and children’s long-term outcomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics4(3): 190–224.
23.
EdlundJÖunI (2016) Who should work and who should care? Attitudes towards the desirable division of labour between mothers and fathers in five European countries. Acta Sociologica59(2): 151–169.
24.
EmranMSShilpiF (2011) Intergenerational occupational mobility in rural economy evidence from Nepal and Vietnam. Journal of Human Resources46(2): 427–458.
25.
FarréLVellaF (2013) The intergenerational transmission of gender role attitudes and its implications for female labour force participation. Economica80(318): 219–247.
26.
FernándezRFogliAOlivettiC (2004) Mothers and sons: preference formation and female labor force dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics119(4): 1249–1299.
27.
FuwaM (2004) Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review69(6): 751–767.
28.
FuwaMCohenPN (2007) Housework and social policy. Social Science Research36(2): 512–530.
29.
Generations and Gender Programme (2002–2013) Available at: www.ggp-i.org (accessed April 2017).
30.
GoldbergWAPrauseJLucas-ThompsonRHimselA (2008) Maternal employment and children’s achievement in context: a meta-analysis of four decades of research. Psychological Bulletin134: 77–108.
31.
GuptaS (2006) The consequences of maternal employment during men’s childhood for their adult housework performance. Gender & Society20(1): 60–86.
32.
HayesBC (1987) Female intergenerational occupational mobility within Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland: the importance of maternal occupational status. British Journal of Sociology28(1): 66–76.
33.
HoffmanLW (1989) Effects of maternal employment in the two-parent family. American Psychologist44(2): 283–292.
34.
HollingsheadAB (1975) Four Factor Index of Social Status. New Haven, CT: Yale University Department of Sociology.
35.
HookJL (2006) Care in context: men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review71(4): 639–660.
36.
HsinAFelfeC (2014) When does time matter? Maternal employment, children’s time with parents, and child development. Demography51(5): 1867–1894.
37.
ISSP Research Group (2013) International Social Survey Programme: family and changing gender roles III – ISSP 2002 GESIS data archive. Data file Version 1.1.0 ed. Cologne.
38.
ISSP Research Group (2014) International Social Survey Programme: family and changing gender roles III – ISSP 2012 GESIS data archive. Data file Version 2.0.0 ed. Cologne.
39.
JohnstonDWSchurerSShieldsMA (2014) Maternal gender role attitudes, human capital investment, and labour supply of sons and daughters. Oxford Economic Papers66(3): 631–659.
40.
KanMY (2008) Does gender trump money? Housework hours of husbands and wives in Britain. Work, Employment and Society22(1): 45–66.
41.
KanjiS (2010) What keeps mothers in full-time employment?European Sociological Review27(4): 509–525.
42.
LiuQSkansON (2010) The duration of paid parental leave and children’s scholastic performance. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy10(1): Article 3.
43.
LombardiCMColeyRL (2017) Early maternal employment and children’s academic and behavioral skills in Australia and the United Kingdom. Child Development88(1): 263–281.
44.
Lucas-ThompsonRGGoldbergWAPrauseJ (2010) Maternal work early in the lives of children and its distal associations with achievement and behavior problems: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin136(6): 915–942.
45.
LyonetteCKaufmanGCromptonR (2011) ‘We both need to work’: maternal employment, childcare and health care in Britain and the USA. Work, Employment and Society25(1): 34–50.
46.
MianiCHoorensS (2014) Parents at Work: Men and Women Participating in the Labour Force: Short Statistical Report No. 2. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
47.
MillerRLHayesBC (1990) Gender and intergenerational mobility. In: PayneGAbbottP (eds) The Social Mobility of Women. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press, 61–71.
48.
MoenPEricksonMADempster-McClainD (1997) Their mother’s daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family59(2): 281–293.
49.
O’ReillyJNazioTRocheJM (2014) Compromising conventions: attitudes of dissonance and indifference towards full-time maternal employment in Denmark, Spain, Poland and the UK. Work, Employment and Society28(2): 168–188.
50.
OECD (2007) Babies and Bosses: Reconciling Work and Family Life. A Synthesis of Findings for OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
51.
OlivettiCPatacchiniEZenouY (2013) Mothers, friends and gender identity. NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, MA, November.
52.
OlivettiCPatacchiniEZenouY (2016) Mothers, peers and gender identity. Boston College Department of Economics No. 904. Chestnut Hill, MA, March.
53.
PanayotovaEBrayfieldA (1997) National context and gender ideology: attitudes toward women’s employment in Hungary and the United States. Gender & Society11(5): 627–655.
54.
RasmussenAW (2010) Increasing the length of parents’ birth-related leave: the effect on children’s long-term educational outcomes. Labour Economics17: 91–100.
55.
SchoberPScottJ (2012) Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood. Work, Employment and Society26(3): 514–530.
56.
ScottJCleryE (2013) Gender roles: an incomplete revolution? In: ParkABrysonCCleryECurticeJPhillipsM (eds) British Social Attitudes: The 30th Report. London: NatCen Social Research, 115–138.
57.
Sigle-RushtonWWaldfogelJ (2007) Motherhood and women’s earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic countries. Feminist Economics13(2): 55–91.
58.
StinsonMHGottschalkP (2016) Is there an advantage to working? The relationship between maternal employment and intergenerational mobility. In: CappellariLPolachekSWTatsiramosK (eds) Inequality: Causes and Consequences (Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 43). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 355–405.
59.
StevensGBoydM (1980) The importance of mother: labor force participation and intergenerational mobility of women. Social Forces59(1): 186–199.
60.
SullivanAKetendeSJoshiH (2013) Social class and inequalities in early cognitive scores. Sociology47(6): 1187–1206.
61.
TreasJTaiT-O (2012a) Apron strings of working mothers: maternal employment and housework in cross-national perspective. Social Science Research41(4): 833–842.
62.
TreasJTaiT-O (2012b) How couples manage the household: work and power in cross-national perspective. Journal of Family Issues33(8): 1088–1116.
63.
WolbrechtCCampbellDE (2007) Leading by example: female members of parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 921–939.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
