This article seeks to understand a puzzling finding: that workers in publicly funded home care for older people in Australia, compared to those in Sweden, feel that they are better able to meet their clients’ needs, that their workplaces are less pressed, and that their work is less burdensome and more compatible with their family and social commitments. This finding seems to challenge expectations fostered by comparative sociological research that job quality and care services are inferior in Australia compared to Sweden. Informed by comparative institutionalist theory and care research, the structures and dynamics of the care systems in the two countries are analysed, along with findings from the NORDCARE survey of home care workers conducted in Sweden in 2005 (n=166) and Australia in 2010 (n=318). Differences in the work and working conditions in the two countries are explained by the dynamic interaction of national institutional and highly gendered sector-level effects.
AnttonenASipiläJ (1996) European social care services: is it possible to identify models?Journal of European Social Policy6(2): 87–100.
2.
AnxoDFaganC (2005) The family, the state and the market: the organisation of employment and working time in home care services for the elderly. In: BoschGLehndorffS (eds) Working in the Service Sector: A Tale from Different Worlds. Abingdon: Routledge, 133–64.
3.
AronsonJNeysmithS (2006) Obscuring the costs of home care: restructuring at work. Work, Employment and Society20(1): 27–45.
4.
AskenazyPBerryJ-BCarréFPrunier-PoulmaireSTillyC (2012) Working in large food retailers in France and the USA: the key role of institutions. Work, Employment and Society26(4): 588–605.
5.
AtkinsonCLucasR (2013) Policy and gender in adult social care. Public Administration91(1): 159–73.
6.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2011a) Economic security: employment conditions. In: Gender Indicators Australia, July 2011. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
7.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2011b) Employee Earnings and Hours, May 2010. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
8.
BoschGLehndorffS (eds) (2005) Working in the Service Sector: A Tale from Different Worlds. Abingdon: Routledge.
9.
BrennanDCassBHimmelweitSSzebehelyM (2012) The marketisation of care: rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy22(4): 377–91.
10.
BroadbentK (2013) ‘I’d rather work in a supermarket’: privatization of home care work in Japan. Work, Employment and Society28(5): 702–17.
11.
ChristensenTLægreidP (2002) New Public Management: The Transformations of Ideas and Practice. Hampshire: Ashgate.
12.
DahlHM (2009) New public management, care and struggles about recognition. Critical Social Policy29(4): 634–54.
13.
DavidsonB (2015) Contestability in the human services and its impact on service providers: a case study of community aged care in New South Wales. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW.
14.
DentonMZeytinogluIUDaviesSLianJ (2002) Job stress and job dissatisfaction of home care workers in the context of health care restructuring. International Journal of Health Services32(2): 327–57.
15.
DobbinFBoychukT (1999) National employment systems and job autonomy: why job autonomy is high in the Nordic countries and low in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Organization Studies20(2): 257–91.
16.
Eliasson LappalainenRMotevaselI (1997) Ethics of care and social policy. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare6(3): 189–96.
17.
ElstadJIVabøM (2008) Job stress, sickness absence and sickness presenteeism in Nordic elderly care. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health36(5): 467–74.
18.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
FisherBTrontoJ (1990) Towards a feminist theory of caring. In: AbelEKNelsonMK (eds) Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 35–62.
20.
GallieD (2007) Production regimes and the quality of employment in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology33: 85–104.
21.
HallPASoskiceD (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HealyJ (2002) The care of older people: Australia and the United Kingdom. Social Policy & Administration36(1): 1–19.
23.
HimmelweitS (1999) Caring labor. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science561(1): 27–38.
24.
HolmanD (2013) An explanation of cross-national variation in call centre job quality using institutional theory. Work, Employment and Society27(1): 21–38.
25.
HuberMRodriguesRHoffmannFGasiorKMarinB (2009) Facts and Figures on Long-Term Care – Europe and North America. Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research.
26.
KammerANiehuesJPeichlA (2012) Welfare regimes and welfare state outcomes in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy22(5): 455–71.
27.
KingDMavromarasKWeiZHeBHealyJMacaitisKMoskosMSmithL (2013a) The Aged Care Workforce, 2012. Canberra, ACT: Department of Health and Ageing.
28.
KingDWeiZHoweA (2013b) Work satisfaction and intention to leave among direct care workers in community and residential aged care in Australia. Journal of Aging & Social Policy25(4): 301–19.
29.
KnijnT (2000) Marketization and the struggling logics of (home) care in the Netherlands. In: MeyerMH (ed.) Care Work: Gender, Labor and the Welfare State. New York: Routledge, 232–48.
30.
Kommunal (2014) Är det här okej? En rapport om villkoren för visstidsoch timanställda. Stockholm: Kommunal.
31.
KrögerTYeandleS (eds) (2013) Combining Paid Work and Family Care: Policies and Experiences in Comparative Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
32.
LloydCPayneJ (2013) Changing job roles in the Norwegian and UK fitness industry: in search of national institutional effects. Work, Employment and Society27(1): 3–20.
33.
MearsJ (2006) The World of Care Work (Report). Sydney, NSW: Benevolent Society.
34.
MorrisonS (2015) Budget 2015: Supporting Great Choice for Older Australians (Press release by Minister of Social Services, 12May). Canberra, ACT: Parliament House.
35.
NBHW (2013) Tillståndet och utvecklingen inom hälso- och sjukvård och socialtjänst. Lägesrapport 2013. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
36.
OECD (2011) Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care. Paris: OECD.
O’ReillyJ (2006) Framing comparisons: gendering perspectives on cross-national comparative research on work and welfare. Work, Employment and Society20(4): 731–50.
39.
Productivity Commission (2013) An Ageing Australia: Preparing for the Future, Commission Research Paper. Canberra, ACT: Productivity Commission.
40.
RanciCPavoliniE (2013) Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe: Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts. New York: Springer.
41.
RostgaardTTimonenVGlendinningC (2012) Guest editorial: reforming home care in ageing societies. Health and Social Care in the Community20(3): 225–7.
42.
RuberyJUrwinP (2011) Bringing the employer back in: why social care needs a standard employment relationship. Human Resource Management Journal21(2): 122–37.
43.
SchröderM (2013) Integrating Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare State Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
Statistics Sweden (2013) Genomsnittlig grund- och månadslön samt kvinnors lön i procent av mäns lön efter region, sektor, yrke (SSYK) och kön. År 2005-2013. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
45.
StoneD (2000) Caring by the book. In: MeyerMH (ed.) Care Work: Gender, Labor and the Welfare State. New York: Routledge, 89–111.
46.
StranzA (2013) Omsorgsarbetets vardag och vilkor i Sverige och Danmark: Ett feministiskt kritiskt perspectiv. PhD thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
47.
Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) (2014) Välfärdstjänsternas utveckling 1980–2014: Ökande resurser och växande behov. Stockholm: SKL.
48.
SzebehelyMTrydegårdG-B (2012) Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition. Health and Social Care in the Community20(3): 300–9.
49.
TrydegårdG-B (2012) Care work in changing welfare states: Nordic care workers’ experiences. European Journal of Ageing9(2): 119–29.
50.
VabøM (2006) Caring for people or caring for quasi-consumers?European Societies8(3): 403–22.
51.
VabøMSzebehelyM (2012) A caring state for all older people? In: AnttonenAHäikiöLStefánssonK (eds) Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 121–43.
52.
WærnessK (1984) The rationality of caring. Economic and Industrial Democracy5(2): 185–211.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
