Business process reengineering and lean are increasingly used to restructure public sector work. This article presents a case study of reengineering in a California welfare agency. It finds extensive work intensification and reduced autonomy for the workforce, and deteriorating service for the clientele. Rather than attribute these outcomes as inherent to the business process reengineering model, this article emphasizes how cost cutting and quantitative efficiency were prioritized over worker empowerment and service quality because the organization is a government agency facing severe budgetary pressures under neoliberalism, and the clientele consists of indigent families and individuals who have no choice of an alternative provider.
AdlerPSColeRE (1993) Designed for learning: a tale of two auto plants. Sloan Management Review34: 85–94.
2.
AlbizuEOlazaranM (2006) BPR implementation in Europe: the adaptation of a management concept. New Technology, Work and Employment21(1): 43–58.
3.
ArcherRBowkerP (1995) BPR consulting: an evaluation of the methods employed. Business Process Re-engineering and Management Journal1(2): 28–46.
4.
AronsonJNeysmithSM (2006) Obscuring the costs of home care: restructuring at work. Work, Employment and Society20(1): 27–45.
5.
BachSBordognaL (2011) Varieties of new public management or alternative models? The reform of public service employment relations in industrialized democracies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management22(11): 2281–94.
6.
BainesD (2004) Pro-market, non-market: the dual nature of organizational change in social services delivery. Critical Social Policy24(1): 5–29.
7.
BainesD (2010) ‘If we don’t get back to where we were before’: working in the restructured non-profit social services. British Journal of Social Work40(3): 928–45.
8.
BainesDCharlesworthSTurnerDO’NeillL (2014) Lean social care and worker identity: the role of outcomes, supervision and mission. Critical Social Policy34(4): 433–53.
9.
BlairHGrey TaylorSRandleK (1998) A pernicious panacea – a critical evaluation of business re-engineering. New Technology, Work and Employment13(2): 116–28.
10.
BouvilleGAlisD (2014) The effects of lean organizational practices on employees’ attitudes and workers’ health: evidence from France. The International Journal of Human Resource Management25(21): 3016–37.
11.
BurtonJVan den BroekD (2009) Accountable and countable: information management systems and the bureaucratization of social work. British Journal of Social Work39(7): 1326–42.
12.
CareyM (2003) Anatomy of a care manager. Work, Employment and Society17(1): 121–35.
13.
CarterBDanfordAHowcroftDRichardsonHSmithATaylorP (2011) ‘All they lack is a chain’: lean and the new performance management in the British civil service. New Technology, Work and Employment26(2): 83–97.
14.
CarterBDanfordAHowcroftDRichardsonHSmithATaylorP (2013) ‘Stressed out of my box’: employee experience of lean working and occupational ill-health in clerical work in the UK public sector. Work, Employment and Society27: 747–67.
15.
ContiRFWarnerM (1994) Taylorism, teams and technology in ‘reengineering’ work-organization. New Technology, Work and Employment9(2): 93–102.
16.
CrowleyMTopeDChamberlainLJHodsonR (2010) Neo-Taylorism at work: occupational change in the post-Fordist era. Social Problems57(3): 421–47.
17.
CunninghamIJamesP (2009) The outsourcing of social care in Britain: what does it mean for voluntary sector workers?Work, Employment and Society23(2): 363–75.
18.
DoellgastV (2010) Collective voice under decentralized bargaining: a comparative study of work reorganization in US and German call centres. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(2): 375–99.
19.
DoellgastV (2012) Disintegrating Democracy at Work: Labor Unions and the Future of Good Jobs in the Service Economy. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
20.
EsbenshadeJBolinTFascillaGGarberJGuidryAHansenM. (2011) County employees: overworked and undermined: impacts of San Diego county reorganization on family resource centers. Center on Policy Initiatives, Department of Sociology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, May.
21.
FisherM (2004) The crisis of civil service trade unionism: a case study of call centre development in a civil service agency. Work, Employment and Society18(1): 157–77.
22.
FontanesiJ (2010) Eligibility Business Process Reengineering Final Evaluation Report. San Diego, CA: Center for Management Science in Health.
23.
FosterDHoggettP (1999) Change in the benefits agency: empowering the exhausted worker?Work, Employment and Society13(1): 19–39.
24.
Gill-McLureW (2014) The politics of managerial reform in UK local government: a study of control, conflict and resistance 1880s to present. Labor History55(3): 365–88.
25.
GreenF (2006) Demanding Work: The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
GreerISymonG (2014) Comparing workfare regimes: similarities, differences, and exceptions. Working Paper WERU6. London: Work and Employment Research Unit, University of Greenwich.
27.
GreerIGreenwoodIStuartM (2010) Beyond national ‘varieties’: public-service contracting in comparative perspective. In: CunninghamIJamesP (eds) Voluntary Organizations and Public Service Delivery. London: Routledge, 153–67.
28.
GreyCMitevN (1995) Re-engineering organizations: a critical appraisal. Personnel Review24(1): 6–18.
29.
HammerMChampyJ (2001) Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: HarperCollins.
30.
HarringtonBMcloughlinKRiddellD (1998) Business process re-engineering in the public sector: a case study of the contributions agency. New Technology, Work and Employment13(1): 43–50.
31.
HarrisJ (1998) Scientific management, bureau-professionalism, new managerialism: the labour process of state social work. British Journal of Social Work28(6): 839–62.
32.
HauptmeierMVidalM (eds) (2014) Comparative Political Economy of Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
HebsonGGrimshawDMarchingtonM (2003) PPPs and the changing public sector ethos: case-study evidence from the health and local authority sectors. Work, Employment and Society17(3): 481–501.
34.
HeffernanK (2006) Social work, new public management and the language of ‘service user’. British Journal of Social Work36(1): 139–47.
35.
HuttonG (1995) BPR – overcoming impediments to change in the public sector. New Technology, Work and Employment10(2): 147–50.
36.
inTelegy (2012) San Diego Health and Human Services Agency Client Services Improvement Project Strategy and Plan. Danville, CA: inTelegy.
37.
JacksonS (1995) Re-engineering the Post Office. New Technology, Work and Employment10(2): 142–6.
38.
KochanTALansburyRDMacduffieJP (1997) Conclusion: after lean production? In: KochanTALansburyRDMacduffieJP (eds) After Lean Production: Evolving Practices in the World Auto Industry. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 303–24.
39.
LeidnerR (1993) Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
LeungTTF (2008) Accountability to welfare service users: challenges and responses of service providers. British Journal of Social Work38(3): 531–45.
41.
LevermentYAckersPPrestonD (1998) Professionals in the NHS – a case study of business process re-engineering. New Technology, Work and Employment13(2): 129–39.
RuberyJGrimshawDHebsonG (2013) Exploring the limits to local authority social care commissioning: competing pressures, variable practices, and unresponsive providers. Public Administration91(2): 419–37.
44.
SmithV (1997) New forms of work organization. Annual Review of Sociology23: 315–39.
45.
StantonPGoughRBallardieRBartramTBamberGJSohalA (2014) Implementing lean management/Six Sigma in hospitals: beyond empowerment or work intensification?The International Journal of Human Resource Management25(21): 2926–40.
46.
StewartPRichardsonMDanfordAMurphyKRichardsonTWassV (2009) We Sell Our Time No More: Workers’ Struggles against Lean Production in the British Car Industry. London: Pluto.
47.
StoeszDKargerHJ (1990) Welfare reform: from illusion to reality. Social Work35(2): 141–7.
48.
Supportive Parents Information Network (2010) Hunger and the Safety Net in San Diego County: a Participatory Action Research Project Conducted by Supportive Parents Information Network. San Diego, CA: Supportive Parents Information Network.
49.
TaylorPBainP (1999) ‘An assembly line in the head’: work and employee relations in the call centre. Industrial Relations Journal30(2): 101–17.
50.
ThompsonP (2013) Financialization and the workplace: extending and applying the disconnected capitalism thesis. Work, Employment and Society27(3): 472–88.
51.
VidalM (2007a) Lean production, worker empowerment, and job satisfaction: a qualitative analysis and critique. Critical Sociology33(1–2): 247–78.
52.
VidalM (2007b) Manufacturing empowerment? ‘Employee involvement’ in the labour process after Fordism. Socio-Economic Review5(2): 197–232.
53.
VidalM (2013) PostFordism as a dysfunctional accumulation regime: a comparative analysis of the USA, the UK and Germany. Work, Employment and Society27(3): 451–71.
54.
WillmottH (1994) Business process re-engineering and human resource management. Personnel Review23(3): 34–46.
55.
WomackJPJonesDT (2003) Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. New York: Free Press.
