While welfare reform matters for workers and workplaces, it is peripheral in English-language sociology of work and industrial relations research. This article’s core proposition is that active labour market policies (ALMPs) are altering the institutional constitution of the labour market by intensifying market discipline within the workforce. This re-commodification effect is specified drawing on Marxism, comparative institutionalism, German-language sociology and English-language social policy analysis. Because of administrative failure and employer discrimination, however, ALMPs may worsen precarity without achieving the stated goal of increasing labour market participation.
BravermanH (1975) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the 20th Century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press Books.
5.
BredgaardTLarsenF (2008) Quasi-markets in employment policy: do they deliver on promises?Social Policy and Society7(3): 341–52.
6.
BrinkmannUDörreKKrämer RöbenackSSpeidelF (2006) Prekäre Arbeit. Ursachen, Ausmaß, soziale Fogen, und subjektive Verarbeitungsformen unsicherer Beschäftigungsverhältnisse. Bonn: FES.
7.
BrodkinE (2007) Bureaucracy redux: management reformism and the welfare state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory17(1): 1–17.
8.
CastelR (2003) From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers: The Transformation of the Social Question. London: Transaction Publishers.
9.
ClasenJCleggD (2013) Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
CollinsonD (1987) ‘Picking women’: the recruitment of temporary workers in the mail order industry. Work, Employment and Society1(3): 371–87.
11.
DooganK (2009) New Capitalism: The Transformation of Work?Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
DörreKScherschelKBoothMMarquardsenKHaubnerTSchierhornK (2013) Bewährungsproben für die Unterschicht?Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
13.
EichhorstWKonle-SeidlR (2008) Contingent Convergence: A Comparative Analysis of Activation Policies. Bonn: IZA.
14.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
FevreR (2011) Still on the scrapheap? The meaning and characteristics of unemployment in prosperous welfare states. Work, Employment and Society25(1): 1–9.
16.
FosterDHoggettP (1999) Change in the benefits agency: empowering the exhausted worker?Work, Employment and Society13(1): 19–39.
17.
FurlongA (2006) Not a very NEET solution: representing problematic labour market transitions among early school-leavers. Work, Employment and Society20(3): 553–69.
18.
GrayA (2004) Unsocial Europe: Social Protection or Flexploitation?London: Pluto Press.
19.
GreenF (1991) The reserve army hypothesis: a survey of empirical applications. In: DunneP (ed.) Quantitative Marxism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 123–40.
20.
GreenbergDAshworthKCebullaAWalkerR (2005) When welfare-to-work programs seem to work well: explaining why Riverside and Portland shine so brightly. Industrial and Labor Relations Review59(1): 34–49.
21.
GroverC (2005) New Labour, welfare reform, and the reserve army of labour. Capital and Class27(17): 17–23.
22.
HeyesJ (2011) Flexicurity, employment protection and the jobs crisis. Work, Employment and Society25(4): 642–57.
23.
HippLWarnerM (2008) Market forces for the unemployed? Training vouchers in Germany and the USA. Social Policy and Administration42(1): 77–101.
24.
HolzerHStollM (2001) Employers and Welfare Recipients: The Effects of Welfare Reform in the Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
JessopB (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. London: Blackwell.
27.
JohnstonAKornelakisARodriguez d’AcriC (2012) Swords of justice in an age of retrenchment? The role of trade unions in welfare provision. Transfer18(2): 213–24.
28.
KnuthM (2011) Widersprüchliche Dynamiken im deutschen Arbeitsmarkt. WSI-Mitteilungen64(11): 580–7.
29.
KochSSpiesCStephanGWolffJ (2011) Kurz vor der Reform: Arbeitsmarktinstrumente auf dem Prüfstand. IAB Kurzbericht 11. Nürnberg: IAB.
30.
KretsosLLivanosI (2013) The extent and determinants of precarious employment in Europe. Unpublished manuscript. London: University of Greenwich.
31.
LeeDMarsdenDRickmanPDuncombeJ (1990) Scheming for Youth: A Study of YTS in the Enterprise Culture. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
32.
LevitasR (1998) The Inclusive Society. London: Macmillan.
33.
LindsayCMcQuaidR (2004) Avoiding the ‘McJobs’: unemployed job seekers and attitudes to service work. Work, Employment and Society18(2): 297–319.
34.
MarxKEngelsF (1973) Marx-Engels Werke, Band 23. Berlin: Dietz.
35.
MizenP (2003) The Changing State of Youth. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
36.
NickellS (1997) Unemployment and labour market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives11(1): 55–74.
37.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation) (1994) The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies. Paris: OECD.
38.
OffeC (1984) The Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
39.
PeckJ (2001) Workfare States. London: Guilford Press.
40.
PeckJ (2002) Political economies of scale: fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography78(3): 331–60.
41.
PiersonP (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
PolanyiK (1957) The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
43.
PontussonJ (2012) Once again a model: Nordic social democracy in a globalized world. In: CroninJ. (eds) What’s Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 89–115.
44.
ReeseE (2011) They Say Cutback, We Say Fightback! Welfare Activism in an Era of Retrenchment. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
45.
RoyallF (2009) Political challengers, service providers or service recipients? In: GiugniM (ed.) The Politics of Unemployment in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate, 117–32.
46.
RuberyJ (2011) Reconstruction amid deconstruction: or why we need more of the social in the European social models. Work, Employment and Society25(4): 658–74.
47.
ScherschelKStreckeisenPKrennM (eds) (2012) Neue Prekarität. Die Folgen aktivierender Arbeitsmarktpolitik – europäische Länder im Vergleich. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
48.
SossJSchramS (2007) A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review101(1): 111–27.
49.
StandingG (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.
VidalM (2013) Postfordism as a dysfunctional accumulation regime: a comparative analysis of the USA, the UK and Germany. Work, Employment and Society27(3): 451–71.
52.
WaddingtonJ (2005) Trade unions and the defence of the European social model. Industrial Relations Journal36(6): 518–40.
53.
WebbSWebbB (eds) (1909) The Break-Up of the Poor Law. London: Longmans.
54.
WellerS (2010) Financial stress and the long-term outcomes of job loss. Work, Employment and Society26(1): 10–25.
55.
WigganJ (2014) Active Labour Market Policy under the UK Conservative-Liberal Coalition Government: An Autonomist Marxist Analysis. Working Paper, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
