This article presents midwives’ views and experiences of flexible working and work–life balance. Both flexible working and work–life balance are important contemporary agendas within midwifery and can have both positive and negative consequences for midwives. Full-time midwives and those without caring commitments feel disadvantaged by flexible working and work–life balance policies as they have to fit when they work around part-time midwives and are increasingly expected to cover extra work. They feel their work–life balance is marginalized and this is fuelling discontent and resentment among midwives and leading to divisions between full- and part-time staff that reinforce flexibility stigma. Although flexible working and work–life balance are important for recruiting and retaining midwives they are part of the ongoing tensions and challenges for midwives and the midwifery profession.
AbendrothAKDen DulkL (2011) For the work–life balance in Europe: the impact of state, workplace and family support on work–life balance satisfaction. Work, Employment and Society25(2): 234–56.
2.
AndersonCMStewartSDimidjianS (1994) Flying Solo: Single Women in Midlife. New York: W.W. Norton & Company (Cited in HamiltonEGordonJRWhelan BerryK (2006) Understanding the work–life conflict of never-married women without children. Women in Management Review21(5): 393–415.
3.
AtkinsonCHallL (2011) Flexible working and happiness in the NHS. Employee Relations33(2): 88–105.
4.
AybarsAI (2007) Work–life balance in the EU and leave arrangements across welfare regimes. Industrial Relations Journal38(60): 569–90.
5.
BallLCurtisPKirkhamM (2003) Why Do Midwives Leave?London: Royal College of Midwives.
6.
BlytonP (2011) Working time, work–life balance and inequality. In: BlytonPHeeryETurnbullP (eds) Reassessing the Employment Relationship. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 299–317.
7.
BoltonSMuzioD (2008) The paradoxical processes of feminization in the professions: the case of established, aspiring and semi-professions. Work, Employment and Society22(2): 281–99.
8.
BranineM (1999) Part-time work in the public health service in Denmark, France and the UK. International Journal of Human Resource Management10(3): 411–28.
9.
BranineM (2003) Part-time work and job sharing in health care: is the NHS a family friendly employer?Journal of Health Organization and Management17(1): 53–68.
10.
CechEABlair-LoyM (2014) Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers. Work and Occupations41(1): 86–110.
11.
ChandraV (2012) Work–life balance: eastern and western perspectives. International Journal of Human Resource Management23(5): 1040–56.
12.
CorbySMathiesonH (1997) The National Health Service and the limits of flexibility. Public Policy and Administration12(4): 60–73.
13.
CromptonR (2002) Employment, flexible working and the family. British Journal of Sociology53(4): 537–58.
14.
CromptonRHarrisF (1998) Explaining women’s employment patterns: orientations to work revisited. British Journal of Sociology49(1): 118–36.
15.
CromptonRLyonetteC (2007) Reply to Hakim. British Journal of Sociology58(1): 133–4.
16.
CromptonRLyonetteC (2011) Women’s career success and work–life adaptations in the accountancy and medical professions in Britain. Gender, Work and Organization18: 231–54.
17.
CurtisPBallLKirkhamM (2006a) Why do midwives leave? (Not) being the kind of midwife you want to be. British Journal of Midwifery14(1): 27–31.
18.
CurtisPBallLKirkhamM (2006b) Working together? Indices of division within the midwifery workforce. British Journal of Midwifery14(3): 138–41.
19.
CurtisPBallLKirkhamM (2006c) Flexible working patterns: balancing service needs or fuelling discontent?British Journal of Midwifery14(5): 260–4.
20.
DaveyBMurrellsTRobinsonS (2005) Returning to work after maternity leave: UK nurses’ motivations and preferences. Work, Employment and Society19(2): 327–48.
21.
Department of Business, Innovation & Skills and Department for Education (2013) Shared Parental Leave reforms will give parents greater flexibility about how they mix and match care of their child. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/shared-parental-leave (accessed 8 December 2014).
22.
Department of Health (DH) (2000) Improving Working Lives Standard. NHS Employers Committed to Improving the Working Lives of People Who Work in the NHS. London: DH.
23.
Department of Health (DH) (2010) Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: DH.
24.
Department of Trade and Industry (2005) Work and Families: Choice and Flexibility. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
25.
DexSMcCullochA (1997) Flexible Employment – The Future of Britain’s Jobs. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
26.
DickP (2010) The transition to motherhood and part-time working: mutuality and incongruence in the psychological contracts existing between managers and employees. Work, Employment and Society24(3): 508–25.
27.
EdwardsCRobinsonO (1999) Managing part-timers in the police service: a study of inflexibility. Human Resource Management Journal9(4): 5–18.
28.
EdwardsCRobinsonO (2004) Evaluating the business case for part-time working among qualified nurses. British Journal of Industrial Relations42(1): 167–83.
29.
EikhofDRWarhurstCHaunschildA (2007) Introduction: what work? What life? What balance? Critical reflections on the work–life balance debate. Employee Relations29(4): 325–33.
30.
FinlaysonLRNazrooJY (1998) Gender Inequalities in Nursing Careers. London: Policy Studies Institute.
31.
FleetwoodS (2007) Why work–life balance now?International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 387–400.
32.
GaleaCHoukesIDe RijkA (2014) An insider’s point of view: how a system of flexible working hours helps employees to strike a proper balance between work and personal life. International Journal of Human Resource Management25(8): 1090–111.
33.
GinnJArberSBrannenJDaleADexSEliasP. (1996) Feminist fallacies: a reply to Hakim on women’s employment. British Journal of Sociology47(1): 167–74.
34.
GregoryAMilnerS (2009) Editorial: work–life balance: a matter of choice?Gender, Work and Organization16(1): 1–13.
35.
HakimC (1996) Key Issues in Women’s Work: Female Heterogeneity and the Polarisation of Women’s Employment. London: Athlone Press.
36.
HakimC (2000) Work Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Health and Social Care Information Centre (2014) Non Medical Staff Census. Available at: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/home (accessed 8 December 2014).
Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO) (2006) Working Families Act 2006 Chapter 16. London: HMSO.
40.
HoremansJMarxI (2013) Should we care about part-time work from a poverty perspective? An analysis of the EU15 countries. In: KochMFritzM (eds) Non-Standard Employment in Europe: Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 169–89.
41.
KanMYSullivanOGershunyJ (2011) Gender convergence in domestic work: discerning the effects of international and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology45(2): 234–51.
42.
KirkhamM (1996) Professionalisation past and present: with women or with the powers that be? In: KrollD (ed.) Midwifery Care for the Future: Meeting the Challenge. London: Balliere Tindall, 156–86.
43.
KretsosLMartinez-LucioM (2013) Destandardisation of employment in the UK: issues, politics and policy reinvention. In: KochMFritzM (eds) Non-Standard Employment in Europe: Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 103–16.
44.
LewisSGamblesRRapoportR (2007) The constraints of a ‘work–life balance’ approach: an international perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 360–73.
45.
LindsayJMaherJM (2014) The intersections of work time and care time: nurses and builders’ family time economies. Work, Employment and Society28(2): 189–205.
46.
McDonaldPBradleyLBrownK (2009) ‘Full-time is a given here’: part-time versus full-time job quality. British Journal of Management20(2): 143–57.
47.
McRaeS (2003a) Choice and constraints in mothers employment careers: McRae replies to Hakim. British Journal of Sociology54(4): 585–92.
48.
McRaeS (2003b) Constraints and choices in mothers’ employment careers: a consideration of Hakim’s Preference Theory. British Journal of Sociology54(3): 317–38.
49.
Midwifery 2020 Programme (2010) Midwifery 2020 Workforce and Workload Final Report. Leeds: DH.
50.
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) (2008) Statistical Analysis of the Register 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008. London: NMC.
51.
Office of National Statistics (ONS) (2013) Full Report Women in the Labour Market. London: Office of National Statistics, 25September.
52.
Opportunity Now (2014) Project 28–40: The Report (Business in the Community). London: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
53.
PerronsD (1999) Flexible working patterns and equal opportunities in the European Union: conflict or compatibility?European Journal of Women’s Studies6(4): 391–418.
54.
ProwseJMProwsePJ (2008) Role redesign in the National Health Service: the effects on midwives’ work and professional boundaries. Work, Employment and Society22(4): 695–712.
55.
PurcellKHogarthTSimmC (1999) Whose Flexibility? The Costs and Benefits of Non-Standard Working Arrangements and Contractual Relations (Work and Opportunity Series No. 12). York: YPS Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
56.
PutnamLLMyersKKGailliardBM (2014) Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations7(4): 413–40.
57.
RaffertyARuberyJGrimshawD (2011) Workforce Risks and Opportunities: Working Time Practices in Nursing and Midwifery. London: Centre for Workforce Intelligence.
58.
RansomeP (2007) Conceptualizing boundaries between ‘life’ and ‘work’. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 374–86.
59.
RobertsK (2007) Work–life balance – the sources of the contemporary problem and the probable outcomes. A review and interpretation of the evidence. Employee Relations29(4): 334–51.
60.
Royal College of Midwives (RCM) (2011) State of Maternity Services Report. London: RCM.
61.
Sánchez-VidalMECegarra-LeivaDCegarra-NavarroJG (2012) Gaps between managers’ and employees’ perceptions of work–life balance. International Journal of Human Resource Management23(4): 645–61.
62.
SmithsonJStokoeEH (2005) Discourses of work–life balance: negotiating ‘Genderblind’ terms in organizations. Gender, Work and Organization12: 147–68.
63.
The Stationery Office, (2014a) Terms and Conditions of Employment: Flexible Working Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/1398). London: The Stationery Office.
64.
The Stationery Office, (2014b) Children and Families Act (Chapter 6) Part 7. London: The Stationery Office.
65.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
66.
SymondsAHuntSC (1996) The Midwife and Society: Perspectives, Policies and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
TeasdaleN (2013) Fragmented sisters? The implications of flexible working policies for professional women’s workplace relationships. Gender, Work and Organization20(4): 397–412.
68.
TippingSChanfreauJPerryJTaitC (2012) Fourth Work–life Balance Employee Survey (Employment Relations Research Series 122). London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.
69.
United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing Midwifery and Health Visiting (UKCC) (2001) Analysis of Statistical Data for Nurses Midwives and Health Visitors. London: UKCC.
70.
WalshJ (2013) Gender, the work–life interface and wellbeing: a study of hospital doctors. Gender, Work and Organization20(4): 439–53.
71.
WarrenT (2004) Working part-time: achieving a successful ‘work–life’ balance?British Journal of Sociology55(1): 99–122.
72.
WarrenTFoxEPascallG (2009) Innovative social policies: implications for work–life balance among low-waged women in England. Gender, Work and Organization16: 26–150.
73.
WhittockMEdwardsCMcLarenSRobinsonO (2002) The tender trap: gender, part-time nursing and the effects of ‘family-friendly’ policies on career advancement. Sociology of Health & Illness24: 305–26.
74.
WilliamsJC (2000) Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
WiseSSmithCValsecchiRMuellerFGabeJ (2007) Controlling working time in the ward and on the line. Employee Relations29(4): 352–66.
