The removal of the default retirement age in the UK has been broadly welcomed as the disposal of an age-discriminatory measure. It is argued here that a focus on formal equality has been at the expense of a more critical analysis of the employment relations consequences. The central role given to performance measurement allows employers considerable discretion over when employees retire and the scope for bargained outcomes in the new regime is limited. This may be to the detriment of older workers and will have implications for the workforce as a whole. Equality, in other words, may come at the expense of a broader conception of fairness.
ACAS (2008) Small firms and workplace disputes resolution. Working Paper 01/08. London: ACAS.
2.
AntcliffVSaundryR (2009) Accompaniment, workplace representation and disciplinary outcomes in British workplaces – just a formality?British Journal of Industrial Relations47(1): 100–21.
3.
ArmstrongM (2012) Armstrong’s Handbook of Reward Management Practice: Improving Performance through Reward, 4th edition.London: Kogan Page.
4.
BeckV (2013) Employers’ use of older workers in the recession. Employee Relations35(3): 257–71.
5.
BrownMHyattDBensonJ (2010) Consequences of the performance appraisal experience. Personnel Review39(3): 375–96.
6.
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) (2011a) Employee Outlook: Focus on Managing an Ageing Workforce. London: CIPD.
7.
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) (2011b) Managing Age. London: CIPD.
8.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2009) Building a Society for All Ages. Cm. 7655. The Stationery Office.
9.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2010) Phasing Out the Default Retirement Age: Consultation Document. London: DWP/BIS.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2011a) Answers to Employers’ Questions. London: DWP.
12.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2011b) Workforce Management without a Fixed Retirement Age. London: DWP.
13.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2013) Employing Older Workers: An Employer’s Guide to Today’s Multi-Generational Workforce. London: DWP.
14.
DiniE (2009) Older workers in the UK: variations in economic activity status by socio-demographic characteristics, household and caring commitments. Population Trends137: 11–24.
15.
DuncanC (2008) The dangers and limitations of equality agendas as a means of tackling old-age prejudice. Ageing and Society28(8): 1133–58.
FuertesVEgdellVMcQuaidR (2013) Extending working lives: age management in SMEs. Employee Relations35(3): 272–93.
19.
GilbertK (2012) Promises and practices: job evaluation and equal pay forty years on!Industrial Relations Journal43(2): 137–51.
20.
GoffinRJelleyBPowellDJohnstonN (2009) Taking advantage of social comparisons in performance appraisal: the relative percentile method. Human Resource Management48(2): 251–68.
21.
GoodmanJEarnshawJMarchingtonMHarrisonR (1998) Unfair dismissal cases, disciplinary procedures, recruitment methods and management style: case studies from three industrial sectors. Employee Relations20(6): 536–50.
HerringJ (2011) Age discrimination and the law: forging the way ahead. In: ParryETysonS (eds) Managing an Age Diverse Workforce. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 24–39.
24.
KilpatrickC (2008) The new UK retirement regime, employment law and pensions. Industrial Law Journal37(1): 1–24.
25.
KonradALinnehanF (1995) Formalized HRM structures: coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices?Academy of Management Journal38(3): 787–820.
26.
LCCI/Penningtons (2011) Tackling the Age-old Problem of Retirement. London: London Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Penningtons Solicitors.
27.
LorettoWVickerstaffS (2013) The domestic and gendered context of retirement. Human Relations66(1): 65–86.
MitchieJZubanovNSheehanM (2008) Human Resource Management Practices, Organizational Outcomes and Performance: An Analysis of WERS 2004 Data. London: Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
30.
Müller-CarmenMFlynnMSchroederH (2011) The impact of national context on managing age diversity: the cases of the UK and Germany. In: ParryETysonS (eds) Managing an Age Diverse Workforce. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 223–45.
RobertsI (2006) Taking age out of the workplace: putting older workers back in?Work, Employment and Society20(1): 67–86.
33.
SargeantM (2006) The employment equality (age) regulations 2006: a legitimisation of age discrimination in employment. Industrial Law Journal35(3): 209–27.
34.
Social Policy and Society (2013) Themed section on Rethinking Retirement Incomes: Inequality and Policy Change in the UK and Anglo Saxon Countries.Vol. 12, no. 1.
35.
TaylorP (2013) Performance Management and the New Workplace Tyranny: A Report for the Scottish Trades Union Congress. Glasgow: STUC.
36.
TemplerAArmstrong-StassenM (2008) The HR management perspective on the elimination of mandatory retirement in Ontario. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations63(4): 603–21.
37.
The Age and Employment Network (TAEN) (2011) Survey Finds Most Employers Will Let Employees Retire When They Want. London: TAEN.
38.
TUC/CIPD (2007) Managing Age: A Guide to Good Employment Practice. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
39.
VerbeekS (2011) Employment equity policy frames in the literature: ‘good practice’ versus ‘bad idea’. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(9): 1942–62.
40.
VickersLManfrediS (2013) Age equality and retirement: squaring the circle. Industrial Law Journal42(1): 61–74.
41.
VickerstaffS (2010) Older workers: the ‘unavoidable obligation’ of extending our working lives. Sociology Compass4(10): 869–79.
42.
VickerstaffSLorettoWBillingsJBrownPMittonLParkinT. (2008) Encouraging Labour Market Activity Among 60–64 Year Olds. Research report no. 531. Norwich: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
43.
WhiteM (2012) Older employees under pressure? Theorizing reasons for declining commitment. Work, Employment and Society26(3): 447–63.
44.
WoodARobertsonMWintersgillD (2010) A Comparative Review of International Approaches to Mandatory Retirement. Research report no. 674. Norwich: Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).
