The phenomenon of workplace partnership has attracted significant academic interest. This article uses case study evidence from a traditional heavy engineering MNC context to examine how the pursuit of collaborative strategies affected the roles of a multi-layered, mature community of trade union shop stewards. The analytical lens of legitimacy is used to provide insight into the contrasting experiences of senior and sectional stewards – a hitherto overlooked area. This study suggests limitations at one level of representation may be offset by advances at another and thus aids understanding of the conditions underpinning the impact of partnership.
BaconNStoreyJ (2000) New employee strategies in Britain: towards individualism or partnership?British Journal of Industrial Relations38(3): 407–27.
2.
BatstoneEVBorastonIGFrenkelS (1977) Shop Stewards in Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
ChaisonGBigelowB (2002) Unions and Legitimacy. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
DarlingtonR (1994) The Dynamic of Workplace Unionism. London: Mansell.
5.
DobbinsAGunnigleP (2009) Can voluntary partnership deliver sustainable mutual gains?British Journal of Industrial Relations47(3): 546–70.
6.
FairbrotherPWaddingtonJ (1990) The politics of trade unionism: evidence, policy and theory. Capital and Class14(2): 15–56.
7.
GallG (2005) Breaking with, and breaking, ‘partnership’: the case of the postal workers and Royal Mail in Britain. In: StuartMMartinez LucioM (eds) Partnership and Employment Relations. London: Routledge, 154–70.
8.
GearyJFRocheWK (2003) Workplace partnership and the displaced activist thesis. Industrial Relations Journal34(1): 32–51.
9.
GuestDPecceiR (2001) Partnership at work: mutuality and the balance of advantage. British Journal of Industrial Relations39(2): 207–36.
10.
HarrissonDRoyMHainesV (2011) Union representatives in labour–management partnerships: roles and identities in flux. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(3): 411–35.
11.
HeeryENoonM (2001) A Dictionary of Human Resource Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
HymanR (1979) The politics of workplace trade unionism: recent tendencies and some problems in theory. Capital and Class8: 54–67.
13.
HymanR (1989) The Political Economy of Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice in a Cold Climate. London: Macmillan.
14.
HymanR (1997) The future of employee representation. British Journal of Industrial Relations35(3): 309–36.
15.
JohnstoneSAckersPWilkinsonA (2009) The British partnership phenomenon: a ten year review. Human Resource Management Journal19(3): 260–79.
16.
JohnstoneSWilkinsonAAckersP (2010) Critical incidents of partnership: five years’ experience at NatBank. Industrial Relations Journal41(4): 382–98.
17.
KellyJ (1998) Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves. London: Routledge.
18.
KirkbrideP (1992) Power in employment relations. In: HartleyJStephensonM (eds) Employment Relations: The Psychology of Influence and Control at Work. Oxford: Blackwell, 67–88.
19.
KochanTOstermanP (1994) The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership among Labor, Management and Government. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20.
MarshA (1963) Managers and Shop Stewards. London: Institute of Personnel Management.
21.
MartinD (2010) The removal of workplace partnership in the UK civil service: a trade union perspective. Industrial Relations Journal41(3): 218–32.
22.
Martinez LucioMStuartM (2002) Assessing the principles of partnership: workplace trade union representatives’ attitudes and experiences. Employee Relations24(3): 305–20.
23.
Martinez LucioMStuartM (2004) Partnership and the politics of trade union policy formation in the UK: the case of the Manufacturing, Science and Finance Union. In: VermaAKochanT (eds) Unions in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 191–204.
24.
Martinez LucioMStuartM (2005) Partnership and new industrial relations in a risk society: an age of shotgun weddings and marriages of convenience?Work, Employment and Society19(4): 797–817.
25.
Martinez LucioMWestonS (1994) New management practices in multinational corporations: the restructuring of worker representation and rights. Industrial Relations Journal25(2): 110–21.
26.
MuellerFPurcellJ (1992) The Europeanisation of manufacturing and the decentralisation of bargaining: the restructuring of worker representation and rights. Industrial Relations Journal25(2): 110–21.
27.
PartridgeB (1977) The activities of shop stewards. Industrial Relations Journal8(4): 28–42.
28.
RittauYDundonT (2010) The roles and functions of shop stewards in workplace partnership: evidence from the Republic of Ireland. Employee Relations32(1): 10–27.
29.
RocheWKGearyJF (2002) Advocates, critics and union involvement in workplace partnership: Irish airports. British Journal of Industrial Relations40(4): 659–88.
30.
SamuelP (2005) Partnership working and the cultivated activist. Industrial Relations Journal36(1): 59–76.
31.
StreeckW (1998) Beneficial constraints: on the economic limits of rational voluntarism. In: HollingsworthJRBoyerR (eds) Contemporary Capitalism: The Embededdness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–219.
32.
StuartMMartinez LucioM (2005a) Partnership and modernisation in employment relations: an introduction. In: StuartMMartinez LucioM (eds) Partnership and Employment Relations. London: Routledge, 1–22.
33.
StuartMMartinez LucioM (2005b) Trade union representatives’ attitudes and experiences of the principles and practices of partnership. In: StuartMMartinez LucioM (eds) Partnership and Employment Relations. London: Routledge, 101–19.
34.
SuchmanM (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
35.
TerryM (2003) Partnership and the future of trade unions in the UK. Economic and Industrial Democracy24(4): 485–507.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
