How can critical social scientists pursue critically engaged research? This question is addressed by examining how an action research intervention, informed by critical realism, was used to assist a business support agency (SUPPAG) to provide support to new migrant business owners. The article responds to calls for more engaged approaches to research, and more engagement with new migrants in different forms of employment. Key critical realist ideas (layered ontology, mechanisms, morphogenetic loops) shaped: the theoretical perspective; the approach to action research; the findings; and practice at SUPPAG. A key conclusion is that ‘engaged’ research is possible without compromising a commitment to critical scholarship.
AckroydS (2009) Research designs for realist research. In: BuchananDBrymanA (eds) Handbook of Organisational Research Methods. London: Sage Publications, 532–48.
2.
AhmadA (2008) Dead men working: time and space in London’s (‘illegal’) migrant economy. Work, Employment and Society22(2): 301–18.
3.
AndersonB (2010) Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society24(2): 300–17.
4.
ArcherM (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BeirneM (2008) Idealism and the applied relevance of research on employee participation. Work, Employment and Society22(4): 675–93.
6.
BlochA (2013) The labour market experiences and strategies of young undocumented migrants. Work, Employment and Society27(2): 272–87.
7.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: WestportJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 241–58.
8.
BrookPDarlingtonR (2013) Partisan, scholarly and active: arguments for an organic public sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society27(2): 232–43.
9.
CassellCJohnsonP (2006) Action research: explaining the diversity. Human Relations59(6): 783–814.
CrouchCLe GalèsPTrigiliaCVoelzkowH (eds) (2001) Local Production Systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
DattaKMcIlwaineCEvansYHerbertJMayJWillsJ (2007) From coping strategies to tactics: London’s low-pay economy and migrant labour. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(2): 404–32.
13.
DenisJLehouxP (2010) Collaborative research: renewing action and governing science. In: BuchananDBrymanA (eds) Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage Publications, 363–80.
14.
DundonTRyanP (2010) Interviewing reluctant respondents. Organizational Research Methods13(3): 562–81.
15.
EdwardsPKO’MahoneyJVincentS (eds) (2014) Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
FriedmanVRogersT (2009) There is nothing so theoretical as good action research. Action Research7(1): 31–47.
17.
HolgateJ (2005) Organising migrant workers: a case study of working conditions and unionisation at a sandwich factory in London. Work, Employment and Society19(3): 463–80.
18.
HoustonS (2010) Prising open the black box critical realism: action research and social work. Qualitative Social Work9(1): 73–91.
19.
HuzzardTBjorkmanH (2012) Trade unions and action research. Work, Employment and Society26(1): 161–71.
20.
JonesTRamM (2007) Re-embedding the ethnic business agenda. Work, Employment and Society21(3): 439–57.
21.
KloostermanR (2010) Matching opportunities with resources: a framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development22(1): 25–45.
22.
KloostermanRvan der LeunJRathJ (1999) Mixed embeddedness: (in)formal economic activity and immigrant businesses in the Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23(2): 252–66.
23.
KontosPPolandB (2009) Mapping new theoretical and methodological terrain for knowledge translation: contributions from critical realism and the arts. Implementation Science4(1): 1–10.
24.
MacKenzieRFordeC (2009) The rhetoric of the ‘good worker’ versus the realities of employers’ use and the experiences of migrant workers. Work, Employment and Society23(1): 142–59.
25.
MacKenzieRFordeCCiupijusZ (2012) Networks of support for new migrant communities: institutional goals versus substantive goals?Urban Studies49(3): 631–47.
26.
MutchA (2002) Actors and networks or agents and structure: towards a realist view of information systems. Organization9(3): 477–96.
PorterSShortallS (2009) Stakeholders and perspectivism in qualitative policy evaluation: a realist reflection. Public Administration87(2): 259–73.
33.
RamMJonesT (2008) Ethnic minority business: review of research and policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(2): 352–74.
34.
RamMTheodorakopoulosNJonesT (2008) Forms of capital, mixed embeddedness and Somali enterprise. Work, Employment and Society22(3): 427–46.
35.
RogersT (2004) The doing of a depth-investigation: implications for the emancipatory aims of critical naturalism. Journal of Critical Realism3(2): 238–69.
36.
SayerA (2000) Realism and Social Science. London: Sage Publications.
37.
ShuttJPugalisLBentleyG (2012) Living up to the hype? The changing framework for regional economic development and localism in the UK. In: WardMHardyS (eds) Changing Gears?London: Smith Institute, 12–24.
38.
StewartPMartinez LucioM (2011) Collective narratives and politics in the contemporary study of work: the new management practices debate. Work, Employment and Society25(2): 327–41.
39.
ThompsonPVincentS (2010) Labour process theory and critical realism. In: ThompsonPSmithC (eds) Working Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 47–69.
40.
Van MaanenJ (1991) Playing back the tape: early days in the field. In: ShaffirWBStebbinsRA (eds) Fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 31–42.
41.
VertovecS (2007) Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies30(6): 1024–54.
42.
WinterRMunn-GiddingsC (2001) A Handbook for Action Research in Health and Social Care. London: Routledge.
