Using a national population survey, this article examines how high-involvement work processes affect employee well-being. The analysis shows that greater experiences of autonomy and participation in decision-making have positive or neutral effects. Higher involvement is a key factor predicting higher job satisfaction and better work–life balance while it has no relationship to stress or fatigue. In contrast, higher levels of work intensity increase fatigue and stress and undermine work–life balance. If the quality of working life is a key objective in a reform based on greater employee involvement, close attention needs to be paid to the balance between processes that release human potential and those that increase the intensity of work.
AppelbaumEBaileyTBergPKallebergA (2000) Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
2.
AshtonDSungJ (2002) Supporting Learning for High Performance Working. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
3.
BeckerBGerhartB (1996) The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal39(4): 779–801.
4.
BeehrTAWalshJTTaberTD (1976) Relationship of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology61(1): 41–7.
5.
BoxallPMackyK (2009) Research and theory on high-performance work systems: progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal19(1): 3–23.
6.
BrysonAForthJKirbyS (2005) High-involvement management practices, trade union representation and workplace performance in Britain. Scottish Journal of Political Economy52(3): 451–91.
7.
CappelliPNeumarkD (2001) Do ‘high performance’ work practices improve establishment level outcomes?Industrial & Labor Relations Review54: 737–76.
8.
ConwayJMLanceCE (2010) What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology25: 325–34.
9.
CookJWallTD (1980) New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology53(1): 39–52.
10.
DanfordARichardsonMStewartPTailbySUpchurchM (2008) Partnership, high performance work systems and quality of working life. New Technology, Work and Employment23(3): 151–66.
11.
DelbridgeR (2007) HRM and contemporary manufacturing. In: BoxallPPurcellJWrightP (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 405–27.
12.
DragoRWoodenMBlackD (2009) Long work hours: volunteers and conscripts. British Journal of Industrial Relations47(3): 571–600.
13.
EbyLTCasperWJLockwoodABordeauxCBrinleyA (2005) Work and family research in IO/OB: content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior66: 124–97.
14.
Eurofound (2012) Work Organisation and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
15.
FelsteadAGallieDGreenFZhouY (2010) Employee involvement, the quality of training and the learning environment: an individual level analysis. International Journal of Human Resource Management21(10): 1667–88.
16.
FrenkelSSandersKBednallT (2013) Employee perceptions of management relations as influences on job satisfaction and quit intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management30: 7–29.
17.
FroneMRYardleyJK (1996) Workplace family-supportive programmes: predictors of employed parents’ importance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology69(4): 351–66.
18.
GallieD (2007) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
GallieD (2013) Direct participation and the quality of work. Human Relations66(4): 453–73.
20.
GallieDWhiteMChengYTomlinsonM (1998) Restructuring the Employment Relationship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21.
GallieDZhouYFelsteadAGreenF (2012) Teamwork, skill development and employee welfare. British Journal of Industrial Relations50(1): 23–46.
22.
GeareAEdgarFDengM (2006) Implementation and consumption of HRM: stakeholder differences. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management14(2): 34–48.
23.
GittelJSeidnerRWimbushJ (2010) A relational model of how high performance work systems work. Organization Science21(2): 299–311.
24.
GodardJ (2004) A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relations42(2): 349–78.
25.
GrantAChristiansonMPriceR (2007) Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives21: 51–63.
26.
GreenF (2006) Demanding Work: The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
GreenF (2008) Work effort and worker well-being in the age of affluence. In: BurkeRJCooperCL (eds) The Long Work Hours Culture: Causes, Consequences and Choices. Bingley: Emerald, 115–35.
28.
HairJFAndersonRETathamRLBlackWC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th Edition.London: Prentice Hall.
29.
HoyrupS (2010) Employee-driven innovation and workplace learning: basic concepts, approaches and themes. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research16(2): 143–54.
30.
KallebergA (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
KallebergANesheimTOlsenK (2009) Is participation good or bad for workers? Effects of autonomy, consultation and teamwork on stress among workers in Norway. Acta Sociologica52(2): 99–116.
32.
KarasekRTheorellT (1990) Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books.
33.
KaufmanBMillerB (2011) The firm’s choice of HRM practices: economics meets strategic human resource management. Industrial & Labor Relations Review64(3): 526–57.
34.
KlineTJBSulskyLMRever-MoriyamaSD (2000) Common method variance and specification errors: a practical approach to detection. Journal of Psychology134(4): 401–21.
35.
LandsbergisPACahillJSchnallP (1999) The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology4(2): 108–30.
36.
LawlerEE (1986) High-Involvement Management: Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
LloydCPayneJ (2006) Goodbye to all that? A critical re-evaluation of the role of the high performance work organization within the UK skills debate. Work, Employment and Society20(1): 151–65.
38.
MackieKSHolahanCKGottliebNH (2001) Employee involvement management practices, work stress, and depression in employees of a human services residential care facility. Human Relations54(8): 1065–92.
39.
MackyKBoxallP (2008) High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: a study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources46(1): 38–55.
40.
MarchingtonMGrugulisI (2000) ‘Best practice’: human resource management: perfect opportunity or dangerous illusion?International Journal of Human Resource Management11(6): 1104–24.
41.
OnoYWatanabeSKanekoSMatsumotoKMiyakoM (1982) Working hours and fatigue of Japanese flight attendants. Journal of Human Ergology20: 155–64.
42.
OshagbemiT (1999) Overall job satisfaction: how good are single versus multiple-item measures?Journal of Managerial Psychology14(5): 388–403.
43.
PaauweJBoselieP (2003) Challenging ‘strategic HRM’ and the relevance of the institutional setting. Human Resource Management Journal13(3): 56–70.
44.
PurcellJ (1999) The search for ‘best practice’ and ‘best fit’: chimera or cul-de-sac?Human Resource Management Journal9(3): 26–41.
45.
RamsayHScholariosDHarleyB (2000) Employees and high-performance work systems: testing inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial Relations38 (4): 501–31.
46.
RhoadesLEisenbergerR (2002) Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology87(4): 698–714.
47.
SparksKCooperCFriedYShiromA (1997) The effect of hours of work on health: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology70(4): 391–409.
48.
StantonJMBalzerWKSmithPCParraLFIronsonG (2001) A general measure of work stress: the stress in general scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement61(5): 866–88.
49.
StewartPDanfordA (2008) Editorial: union strategies and worker engagement with new forms of work and employment. New Technology, Work and Employment23(3): 146–50.
50.
ThompsonCABeauvaisLLLynessKS (1999) When work–family benefits are not enough: the influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior54: 392–415.
51.
VandenbergRJRichardsonHAEastmanLJ (1999) The impact of high involvement work processes on organizational effectiveness: a second order latent variable approach. Group and Organization Management24(1): 300–39.
52.
Van VeldhovenMJongeJBroersenSKompierMMeijmanT (2002) Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: a three-level analytic approach. Work and Stress16(3): 207–28.
53.
WaltonR (1985) From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review63(2): 77–84.
54.
WanousJPReichersAEHudyMJ (1997) Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology82(2): 247–52.
55.
WarrPCookJWallT (1979) Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology52: 129–48.
56.
WhiteMHillSMcGovernPMillsCSmeatonD (2003) ‘High-performance’ management practices, working hours and work–life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations41(2): 175–95.
57.
WhitenerEM (2001) Do ‘high commitment’ human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modelling. Journal of Management27: 515–35.
58.
WoodS (1999) Human resource management and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews1(4): 367–413.
59.
WoodSDe MenezesL (2011) High involvement management, high-performance work systems and well-being. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(7): 1586–610.
60.
WoodSVan VeldhovenMCroonMde MenezesL (2012) Enriched job design, high involvement management and organizational performance: the mediating roles of job satisfaction and well-being. Human Relations65(4): 419–45.
61.
YousefDA (2002) Job satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between job stressors and affective, continuance, and normative commitment: a path analytical approach. International Journal of Stress Management9(2): 99–112.
