The introduction of open-plan (OP) academic offices is critically examined through interviews undertaken in Scotland and Australia. The development is discussed in the context of the increased managerialism in higher education. The conclusion is that, despite a rhetoric of synergy, the dominant rationale for OP is one of cost reduction and that the experience for many academics is proving detrimental to both scholarship and professional identity.
AAPPA (Australasian Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers) (n.d.) Space Management Guidelines. 2nd Edition.AAPPA, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia.
2.
AronoffSKaplanA (1995) Total Workplace Performance: Rethinking the Office Environment. Ottawa: WDL.
3.
BainPBaldryC (1992) The intelligent office and the locus of control. In: BeirneMRamsayH (eds) Information Technology and Workplace Democracy. London: Routledge, 121–45.
4.
BaldryC (1999) Space – the final frontier. Sociology33(3): 535–53.
5.
BaldryCBainPTaylorP (1997) Sick and tired? Working in the modern office. Work, Employment and Society11(3): 519–39.
6.
BaldryCBainPTaylorP (1998) ‘Bright Satanic Offices’: intensification, control and the labour process. In: ThompsonPWarhurstC (eds) Workplaces of the Future. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 163–83.
7.
BanburySPBerryDC (2005) Office noise and employee concentration: identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements. Ergonomics48(1): 25–37.
8.
BarnesA (2007) The construction of control: the physical environment and the development of resistance and accommodation within call centres. New Technology Work and Employment22(3): 246–59.
9.
Bosch-SijtsemaPMRuohomäkiVVartiainenM (2010) Multi-locational office workers in the office: navigation, disturbances and effectiveness. New Technology Work and Employment25(3): 183–95.
10.
BrysonC (2004) What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Industrial Relations Journal35(1): 38–57.
11.
CourtSKinmanG (2008) Tackling Stress in Higher Education. London: University and College Union.
12.
DuffyF (1980) Office buildings and organisational change. In: KingAD (ed.) (1980) Buildings and Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 255–82.
13.
EcoU (1980) Functions and signs: the semiotics of architecture. In: BroadbentG. (eds) Signs, Symbols and Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley.
GorgievskiMVan der VoordtTVan HerpenSVan AkkerenS (2010) After the fire: new ways of working in an academic setting. Facilities28(3/4): 206–24.
16.
HarrisonACairnsA (2008) The Changing Academic Workplace. DEGW. Available (accessed November 2009) at: www.exploreacademicworkplace.com
17.
HedgeA (1982) The open-plan office: a systematic investigation of employee reactions to their work environment. Environment and Behavior14(5): 519–42.
18.
HeerwagenJAKampschroerKPowellKMLoftnessV (2004) Collaborative knowledge work environments. Building Research and Information32(6): 510–28.
19.
KniestP (2010) State of the sector: strangling the goose that lays the golden egg. Advocate17(4): 18–19.
20.
KolsakerA (2008) Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: a study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education33(5): 513–25.
21.
MaransRSpreckelmayerK (1982) Evaluating open and conventional office design. Environment and Behavior14(3): 333–51.
22.
NAO (National Audit Office) (2005) Space Management in Higher Education: A Good Practice Guide. London: NAO.
23.
OldhamGBrassD (1979) Employee reactions to an open plan office: a naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly24(June): 267–84.
24.
ParkerMJaryD (1995) The McUniversity: organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization2(2): 319–38.
25.
Penfold (2009) Paper re Academic Staff Concerns around the Proposed Space Policy. Unpublished position paper tabled at ‘Penfold’ University Senate, June2009.
26.
PinderJParkinJAustinSDugganFLansdaleMDemianP. (2009) The Case for New Academic Workspaces. Loughborough: Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University of Loughborough.
27.
RapoportA (1980) Vernacular architecture and the cultural determinants of form. In: KingA (ed.) Buildings and Society: Essays in the Social Development of the Built Environment. London: Routledge, 283–305.
28.
Scottish Funding Council and University of Strathclyde (2008) Effective Spaces for Working in Higher and Further Education. Available (accessed November 2009) at: www.exploreacademicworkplace.com
29.
SMG (Space Management Group) (2006a) Space Utilisation: Practice, Performance and Guidelines. UK Higher Education Space Management Project. Available (accessed November 2009) at: http://www.smg.ac.uk
30.
SMG (Space Management Group) (2006b) Space Management Project: Summary. UK Higher Education Space Management Project. Available (accessed November 2009) at: http://www.smg.ac.uk
31.
SundstromEHerbertRKBrownD (1982) Privacy and communication in an open plan office: a case study. Environment and Behavior14(3): 379–92.
32.
THES (2006) Door slams shut on a room of one’s own. Times Higher Education Supplement5May, p. 5.
33.
UCU (n.d.) Office space for academic staff. Health and Safety Factsheet;London, University and College Union.
34.
VischerJC (1989) Environmental Quality in Offices. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
35.
VischerJC (2005) Space Meets Status: Designing Workplace Performance. Abingdon: Routledge.
36.
WillmottH (1994) Managing the academics: commodification and control in the development of university education in the UK. International Labour Process Conference, April 1994, University of Aston.
37.
WinefieldAHGillespieNStoughCDuaJHapuarachchiJBoydC (2003) Occupational stress in Australian university staff: results from a national survey. International Journal of Stress Management10(1): 51–63.
38.
ZalesnyMFaraceR (1987) Traditional versus open offices: a comparison of sociotechnical, social relations and symbolic meaning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal30(2): 240–59.
