This article identifies and explores the social construction of professionalism among organizers and senior organizers in the regional office of a UK trade union. The article argues that the social construction of professionalism is linked to servicing, organizing and political campaigning models of internal trade union activity. Moreover, the increasing importance of the organizing model is associated with a shift away from a traditional conceptualization of professionalism towards the managerial professional model described by Faulconbridge and Muzio in which concepts such as strategy, targets and efficiency prevail. There is, however, fragmentation between the socially constructed conceptualizations of professionalism held by organizers and senior organizers. These conflicting conceptualizations are linked to both organizers’ and senior organizers’ everyday practices and concerns in the context of change and uncertainty.
AckroydS (1996) Organization contra organizations: professions and organizational change in the United Kingdom. Organization Studies17(4): 599–621.
2.
AllenK (2009) Social partnership and union revitalisation: the Irish case. In: GallG (ed.) The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 45–61.
3.
AnleuSRMackK (2008) The professionalization of Australian magistrates. Journal of Sociology44(2): 185–203.
4.
BassettP (1986) Strike Free. London: Macmillan.
5.
BassettPCaveA (1993) All for One: The Future of Unions. Fabian Pamphlet 559. London: The Fabian Society.
6.
BellETaylorSThorpeR (2001) Investors in people and the standardization of professional knowledge in personnel management. Management Learning32(2): 201–19.
7.
CarterB (2000) Adoption of the organizing model in British trade unions: some evidence from manufacturing, science and finance (MSF). Work, Employment and Society14(1): 117–36.
8.
CharlwoodA (2004) Influences on trade union effectiveness in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations42(1): 69–93.
9.
ClarkP (2000) Building More Effective Unions. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
10.
CohenS (2009) Opening Pandora’s box: the paradox of institutionalised organising. In: GallG (ed.) The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 28–44.
11.
CooperDJHiningsBGreenwoodRBrownJ (1996) Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: the case of Canadian law firms. Organization Studies17(4): 623–47.
12.
DeweyJ (1933) How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking in the Educative Process. Boston, MA: Heath.
GajewskaKNiesytoJ (2009) Organising campaigns as ‘revitaliser’ for trade unions? The example of the Lidl campaign. Industrial Relations Journal40(2): 156–71.
20.
GallG (2009) Union organising – past, present and future. In: GallG (ed.) The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–9.
21.
HeeryE (2002) Partnership versus organising: alternative futures for British trade unionism. Industrial Relations Journal33(1): 20–35.
22.
HeeryE (2005) Sources of change in trade unions. Work, Employment and Society19(1): 91–106.
23.
HeeryE (2006) The role of union full-time officials: results. Industrial Law Journal35(1): 102–4.
24.
HeeryESimmsM (2008) Constraints on union organising in the United Kingdom. Industrial Relations Journal39(1): 24–42.
25.
HeeryESimmsMDelbridgeRSalmonJSimpsonD (2000) The TUC’s Organising Academy: an assessment. Industrial Relations Journal31(5): 400–415.
26.
HirschsohnP (2007) Union democracy and shopfloor mobilization: social movement unionism in South African auto and clothing plants. Economic and Industrial Democracy28(1): 6–48.
27.
IllichID (1971) Deschooling Society. London: Calder and Boyers.
28.
JerrardMCockfieldSButtigiegD (2009) The ‘servicing-organising-community continuum’: where are Australian unions today? In: GallG (ed.) The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 97–113.
29.
JohnsonTJ (1972) Professions and Power. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
30.
KellyJ (1998) Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves. London: Routledge.
31.
KellyJHeeryE (1994) Working for the Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LarsonMS (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. London: University of California Press.
33.
LeichtKTFennellML (2001) Professional Work: A Sociological Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
34.
McIlroyJ (1995) Trade Unions in Britain Today, 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
35.
MillwardN (1994) The New Industrial Relations?Poole: Policy Studies Institute.
36.
ShermanRVossK (2000) Organize or die: labor’s new tactics and immigrant workers. In: MilkmanR (ed.) Organizing Immigrants: The Challenge for Unions in Contemporary California. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 81–108.
37.
Van KlaverenMSprengerW (2009) Union organising in the Netherlands – a combination of organising and servicing strategies. In: GallG (ed.) The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 62–78.
38.
WaddingtonJ (1992) Trade union membership in Britain 1980–1987: unemployment and restructuring. British Journal of Industrial Relations30(2): 287–324.
39.
WesternJHaynesMDurringtonDADwanK (2006) Characteristics and benefits of professional work. Journal of Sociology42(2): 165–88.
40.
WolcottHF (1999) Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. London: Altimira.
41.
WrightC (2008) Reinventing human resource management: business partners, internal consultants and the limits to professionalization. Human Relations61(8): 1063–86.
