Abstract
The legitimacy of economic transactions is a fundamental element of market order, and its constitution facilitates the ongoing exchange of commodities and services. By bringing sales work to centre stage, this study empirically examines the theoretical claim that legitimacy in advanced markets is constituted not only by macro-structures and institutions, but also in the course of sales encounters. Based on 50 interviews and on extensive observations of sales interactions in a computer store, this study presents empirical support to the theoretical claim that legitimate economic exchange is forged by an interactive dialogue between two distinct paradigms which co-exist on the sales floor: one based on market logic and the other on moral arguments. The article calls for an analytic framework for the study of economic action which transcends the rational-irrational dichotomy and which can account for the diverse interests and scripts of behaviour played out on the sales floor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
