This article argues, through analysing industrial relations at the Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant construction site in Finland, that national unionism is inappropriately structured for the transnational construction industry. Olkiluoto 3 is being built by a French/German consortium employing mostly posted migrants via transnational subcontractors from around Europe. Despite the strong Finnish unions, contractors successfully contested the right of Finnish actors to regulate the site, placing labour relations in a deregulated space between national systems. Although the posted migrants eventually self-organized, Finnish unions remained unresponsive, reluctant to act outside the normal Finnish social partnership industrial relations paradigm. The case illustrates how the nationally based structure of the labour movement is ill-suited to represent a pan-European labour force.
Anderson B.Exodus.Critical Inquiry. 1994;20 (2): 314-27
5.
Backman NE.Hankaluuksia alusta asti.Helsingin Sanomat. 2008;:
6.
Labour migration [Whole issue].Construction Labour Review. 2007;4 (1):
7.
Crouch CIndustrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993:
8.
Dolvik J,Eldring LMobility of Labour from new EU States to the Nordic Region: Development Trends and Consequences. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2008:
9.
ECJ (2007) European Court of Justice judgement C-341/05, Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet and Others, 18December2007.
10.
Eisenhardt K.Building theories from case study research.Academy of Management Review. 1989;14 (4): 532-50
11.
Felini I,Ferro A,Fullin G.Recruitment processes and labour mobility: the construction industry in Europe.Work, Employment and Society. 2007;21 (2): 277-98
12.
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2008) Siemens droht hohe Ergebnisbelastung aus Kraftwerksprojekt. 30March, p. 13.
13.
Gajewska KTransnational Labour Solidarity: Mechanisms of Commitment to Cooperation within the European Trade Union Movement. London: Routledge; 2009:
14.
Gordon JTransnational Labor Citizenship: Report. Fordham University, School of Law; 2009:
15.
Greer I.British unions and migration: an international comparative view.Construction Labour Review. 2007;4 (1): 33-6
16.
Harvey D.Globalization in question.Rethinking Marxism. 1995;8 (4): 1-17
Holgate J.Organising migrant workers: a case study of working conditions and unionization at a sandwich factory in London.Work, Employment and Society. 2005;19 (3): 463-80
19.
Hyde A,Ressaissi M.Unions without borders: recent developments in the theory, practice and law of transnational unionism.Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal. 2009;14 (3): 47-104
20.
Kitay J,Callus RResearching the World of Work: Strategies and Methods in Studying Industrial Relations. Whitfield KStrauss G, ed. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press; 1998:101-12.
21.
Korhonen H.Olkiluoto opetti Timo Kalliolle lisää malttia.Rakentaja. 2007;20 (7 November): 19-20
22.
Lapintie P.Rakennusliiton toimitsijat pääsevät taas Olkiluodon ydinvoimalatyömalle.Helsingin Sanomat. 2005;:
23.
Lillie N.Globalization and class analysis: prospects for labour movement influence in global governance.Industrielle Beziehungen. 2006;13 (3): 223-37
24.
Lillie N.Bringing the offshore ashore: transnational production, industrial relations and the reconfiguration of sovereignty.International Studies Quarterly. 2010;54 (3): 683-704
25.
Lillie N,Greer I.Industrial relations, migration and neo-liberal politics: the case of the European construction sector.Politics and Society. 2007;35 (4): 551-81
26.
MacKenzie R,Forde CEmployment Relations in a Changing Society: Assessing the Post-Fordist Paradigm. Martinez Lucio MAlonso L, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan; 2006:69-85.
27.
MacLachlan A.Olkiluoto-3 commercial date slips to late 2010 at earliest.Nucleonics Week. 2006;47 (9): 1
28.
Marshall THCitizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto; 1992 [1950]:
29.
Menz GVarieties of Capitalism and Europeanization: National Response Strategies to the Single European Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:
30.
Milkman RLA Story: Immigrant Workers and the Future of the U.S. Labor Movement. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2006:
31.
Milkman R,Wong KLA Story: Immigrant Workers and the Future of the U.S. Labor Movement. Milkman R, ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2006 2006:145-86.
32.
Monks J.European Court of Justice (ECJ) and social Europe: a divorce based on irreconcilable differences?.Social Europe. 2008;4 (1): 22-8
33.
Mulinari D,Neergard A.‘Black skull’ consciousness: the new Swedish working class.Race and Class. 2005;46 (3): 55-72
34.
Ong ANeoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006:
35.
Penninx R,Roosblad JTrade Unions, Immigration and Immigrants in Europe, 1960–1993. New York: Berghahn; 2000:
36.
Perlmutter H.The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation.Columbia Journal of World Business. 1969;4 (Jan/Feb): 9-18
37.
Rantanen J.Ydinvoimalatyömaan sopimusriikkomuksista ei ole näyttöjä.Turun Sanomat. 2007;:
38.
Ruusunen A.Olkiluodossa on pärjätty hyvin vähillä tapaturmilla.Rakentaja. 2007;5 (7 March): 14-15
39.
Stake RThe Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage; 1995:
40.
Management of Safety Requirements in Subcontracting during the Olkiluoto 3 Nuclear Power Plant Construction Phase. Helsinki: STUK; 2006:
41.
Virdee S.A Marxist critique of black radical theories of trade-union racism.Sociology. 2000;34 (3): 545-65
42.
Wills J.Making class possible: organizing contract cleaners in London.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2008;32 (2): 305-23
