A recent article in this journal provided a critique of the design of the Survey of Employees Questionnaire within the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. The principal criticisms concerned the use of vague response categories, double-barrelled questions, needless ordinal measurements and the use of multiple binary items in place of ordinal or scalar measures. The critique highlighted some areas worthy of attention but we argue that, in other areas, it took insufficient account of the survey’s core objectives and of the practical and financial constraints guiding its design. We offer a broader assessment of sources of error within the WERS 2004 Survey of Employees.
Airey, C., Hales, J., Hamilton, R., Korovessis, C., McKernan, A. and Purdon, S. ( 1999) The Workplace Employee Relations Survey (WERS) 1997-8: Technical Report (Cross-Section and Panel Surveys). London : National Centre for Social Research.
2.
Amossé, T. and Coutrot, T. ( 2008) ‘Genèse et réalité d’une enquête’, in T. Amossé et al. (eds), Les relations sociales en enterprise. Un portrait à partir des enquêtes ‘Relations professionnelles et négociations d’entreprises’ (REPONSE 1992-1993, 1998-1999 et 2004-2005), pp. 38-68. Paris: Editions La Découverte.
3.
BMRB Social Research (2006) Investigation of Design Options for the Workplace Health and Safety Survey, Research Report 413. London: Health and Safety Executive.
4.
Budd, J. and Mumford, K. ( 2004) ‘Trade Unions and Family-Friendly Policies in Britain’ , Industrial and Labor Relations Review57(2): 204-22.
5.
Chaplin, J., Mangla, J., Purdon, S. and Airey, C. ( 2005) The Workplace Employment Relations Survey 2004: Technical Report. London: National Centre for Social Research.
6.
Church, A. ( 1993) ‘Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis’, Public Opinion Quarterly57(1): 62-79.
7.
Cully, M. ( 1998) A Survey in Transition: The Design of the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
8.
DTI/Acas/ESRC/PSI ( 2003) Design Issues for a Fifth Workplace Employment Relations Survey (WERS5). London: Department of Trade and Industry.
9.
Fowler, F. ( 2002) Survey Research Methods, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
10.
Groves, R. ( 2004) Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
11.
Hooker, H., Neathey, F., Casebourne, J. and Munro, M. ( 2007) The Third Work-Life Balance Employee Survey: Main Findings, Employment Relations Research Series 58. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
12.
Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, G. and Oxenbridge, S. ( 2006) Inside the Workplace: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. London: Routledge.
13.
NatCen (2003) The Fifth Workplace Employment Relations Survey: Cognitive Pilot Report. London : National Centre for Social Research.
14.
Rose, M. ( 2000) How Far Can I Trust It? Job Satisfaction Data in the WERS98 Employee Survey, Working Paper 6: ESRC Future of Work Programme . Swindon: ESRC.
15.
Smeaton, D. and Marsh, A. ( 2006) Maternity and Paternity Rights and Benefits: Survey of Parents 2005, Employment Relations Research Series 50. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
16.
Stevens, J., Brown, J. and Lee, C. ( 2004) The Second Work-Life Balance Employee Survey: Main Findings. Employment Relations Research Series 27. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
17.
Thomas, R., Purdon, S. and Elias, P. ( 1996) WIRS97: Developing an Employee Perspective, Report 1. London and Coventry: Social and Community Planning Research and the Institute for Employment Research .
18.
Thomas, R., Purdon, S. and Elias, P. ( 1997) WIRS97: Developing an Employee Perspective, Report 2. London and Coventry: Social and Community Planning Research and the Institute for Employment Research .
19.
Timming, A. ( 2009) ‘WERS the Validity? A Critique of the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey of Employees’, Work, Employment and Society23(3): 561-70.
