This article assesses the adoption and survival of labour-management partnership agreements in Britain. In contrast to predictions that British employers will avoid partnership agreements, significantly more agreements have been signed than expected with 248 partnership agreements signed between 1990 and 2007. Partnership agreements covered almost ten percent of all British employees in 2007 and one-third of public sector employees. The majority of agreements are now in the public sector as part of government plans to reform the delivery of public services and in the devolved health services of Scotland and Wales as part of the potentially distinctive social democratic approach adopted by the devolved Governments. In contrast to predictions that, once signed, partnership agreements are unlikely to survive, four-fifths (80 percent) of all agreements survived to the close of 2007. Public sector agreements appear particularly robust.
Bach, S., Kessler, I. and White, G. (2005) `Introduction: Employment Relations and Public Services "Modernisation" under Labour', Personnel Review34(6): 629-33.
2.
Bacon, N. and Storey, J. (2000) `New Employee Relations Strategies in Britain: Towards Individualism or Partnership?', British Journal of Industrial Relations38(3): 407-27.
3.
Brown, W. (2000) `Putting Partnership into Practice in Britain' , British Journal of Industrial Relations38(2): 299-316.
4.
Cumbers, A. (2005) `Genuine Renewal or Pyrrhic Victory? The Scale Politics of Trade Union Recognition in the UK', Antipode37(1): 116-138.
5.
Danford, A., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Tailby, S. and Upchurch, M. (2005) Partnership and the High Performance Workplace: Work and Employment Relations in the Aerospace Industry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
Deakin, S., Hobbs, R., Konzelmann, S. and Wilkinson, F. (2002) `Partnership, Ownership and Control: The Impact of Corporate Governance on Employment Relations', Employee Relations24(3): 335-52.
7.
DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) (1998 ) Fairness at Work, Cm 3968. London: The Stationery Office.
8.
Gall, G. (2004) Union-Management Partnership Agreements, Productivity and the Scottish Economy. University of Stirling: Scotecon.
9.
Godard, J. (2004) `A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm', British Journal of Industrial Relations42(2): 349-78.
10.
Guest, D. and Peccei, R. (2001) `Partnership at Work: Mutuality and the Balance of Advantage', British Journal of Industrial Relations39(2): 207-36.
11.
Guest, D., Brown, W., Peccei, R. and Huxley, K. (2008) `Does Partnership at Work Increase Trust? An Analysis Based on the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey', Industrial Relations Journal39(2): 124-52.
12.
Heery, E. (2002) `Partnership versus Organising: Alternative Futures for British Trade Unionism', Industrial Relations Journal33(1): 20-35.
13.
Hyman, R. (2005) `Whose (Social) Partnership?', in M. Stuart and M. Martínez Lucio (eds), Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations, pp. 251-65. London: Routledge .
14.
Kelly, J. (2000) `The Limits and Contradictions of Social Partnership' , Communist Review33(Autumn): 3-7.
15.
Kelly, J. (2004) `Social Partnership Agreements in Britain: Labor Cooperation and Compliance', Industrial Relations43(1): 267-92.
16.
Kelly, J. (2005) `Social Partnership Agreements in Britain', in M. Stuart and M. Martínez Lucio (eds), Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations, pp. 188-209. London: Routledge.
17.
Martínez Lucio, M. and Stuart, M. (2005) `"Partnership" and the New Industrial Relations in a Risk Society: An Age of Shotgun Weddings and Marriages of Convenience?' , Work, Employment and Society19(4): 797-817.
18.
National Statistics (2008) First Release: Labour Market Statistics (March). London: National Statistics.
19.
Oxenbridge, S. and Brown, W. (2004) `Achieving a New Equilibrium? The Stability of Cooperative Employer-Union Relationships', Industrial Relations Journal35(5): 388-402.
20.
Richardson, M., Tailby, S., Danford, A., Stewart, P. and Upchurch, M. (2005) `Best Value and Workplace Partnership in Local Government', Personnel Review34(6): 713-28.
21.
Streeck, W. (1997) `Beneficial Constraints: On the Economic Limits of Rational Voluntarism', in J.R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, pp. 197-219. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
22.
Tailby, S., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Danford, A. and Upchurch, M. (2004) `Partnership at Work and Worker Participation' , Industrial Relations Journal35(5): 403-18.
23.
Terry, M. (2003) `Can `Partnership' Reverse the Decline of British Trade Unions?', Work, Employment and Society17(3): 459-72.
24.
Terry, M. and Smith, J. (2003) Evaluation of the Partnership at Work Fund. Employment Relations Research Series No. 17. London: DTI.
25.
Thompson, P. (2003) `Disconnected Capitalism: Or Why Employers Can't Keep Their Side of the Bargain', Work, Employment and Society17(2): 359-78.
26.
Towers, B. (1997) The Representation Gap: Change and Reform in the British and American Workplace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Turnbull, P. (2003) `What Do Unions Do Now?', Journal of Labor Research24(3): 491-527.
28.
Waddington, J. (2003) `Annual Review Article 2002: Heightening Tension in Relations between Trade Unions and the Labour Government in 2002', British Journal of Industrial Relations41(2): 335-58.
29.
Work Foundation (2004) Trade Union and Employee Involvement in Public Service Reform. London: Office of Public Services Reform.
