There is a growing consensus that professional work faces an uncertain future. However, debates have tended to take a macro focus, underplaying the role of individuals’ accounts of their working lives. In this article we focus on UK architecture, examining how public-sector and private-sector architects construct the purpose and process of their occupation, applying the concept of discourse to explore and explicate the different versions expressed in individuals’ accounts. We argue that architecture is constituted in the modes of creative endeavour, business activity and public service. The discourses that are mobilized, and the occasions of their production, reflect architects’ orientations to the diverse challenges facing their profession, particularly concerning the role of creativity in the purpose and practice of architecture.
Alvesson, M. (2001) ‘Knowledge Work: Ambiguity, Image and Identity’ , Human Relations54(7): 863-886 .
2.
Alvesson, M. and Wilmott, H. (2002) ‘Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual’ , Journal of Management Studies39(5): 619-644 .
3.
Aronowitz, S. and DiFazio, W. (1994) The Jobless Future. Milwaukee: University of Minnesota Press .
4.
Blau, J. (1984) Architects and Firms: A Sociological Perspective on Architectural Practice. London: MIT Press
5.
Carr-Saunders, A.M. and Wilson, P.A. (1933) The Professions. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
6.
Casey, C. (1995) Work, Self and Society: After Industrialism. London: Routledge .
7.
Cohen, L. , Finn, R. , Wilkinson, A. and Arnold, J. (2002) ‘Professional Work and Management’ , International Studies in Management and Organization32(2): 3-24 .
8.
Collinson, D. (2003) ‘Identity and Insecurities: Selves at Work’ , Organization10(3): 527-547 .
9.
Dent, M. and Whitehead, S. (eds) (2002) Managing Professional Identities: Knowledge, Performativity and the ‘New’ Professional. London: Routledge .
10.
Dubinskas, F.A. (1989) ‘Janus Organizations: Scientists and Managers in Genetic Engineering Firms’, in F.A. Dubinskas (ed.) Making Time: Ethnographies of High-technology Organizations, pp. 180-199. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
11.
Egan, J. (1998) Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister on the Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of UK Construction. London: HMSO .
12.
Fine, G. (1992) ‘The Culture of Production: Aesthetic Choices and Constraints in Culinary Work’ , American Journal of Sociology97(5): 1268-1294 .
13.
Fine, G. (1996) ‘Justifying Work: Occupational Rhetorics as Resources in Restaurant Kitchens’ , Administrative Science Quarterly41(1): 90-115 .
14.
Fisher, M. , Marsh, P. , Phillips, D. and Sainsbury, E. (1986) In and Out of Care: The Experience of Children, Parents and Social Workers. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd.
15.
Hall, S. and DuGay, P. (eds) (1996) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage .
16.
Halliday, T.C. (1987) Beyond Monopoly. London: University of Chicago .
17.
Hanlon, A. (1999) Lawyers, the State and the Market - Professionalism Revisited. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
18.
King, N. (2004) ‘Using Templates in the Thematic Analysis of Text’, in C. Cassell and G. Symon (eds) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, pp. 256-270. London: Sage .
19.
Kunda, G. (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
20.
Larson, M.S. (1990) ‘On the Matter of Experts and Professionals, or How it is Impossible to Leave Nothing Unsaid’, in R. Torstendahl and M. Burrange (eds) The Formation of Professions: Knowledge, State and Strategy, pp. 24-50. London: Sage .
21.
LaNuez, D. and Jermier, J.M. (1994) ‘Sabotage by Managers and Technocrats: Neglected Patterns of Resistance at Work’, in J.M. Jermier , D. Knights and W.R. Nord (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations, pp. 219-251. London: Routledge .
22.
Leicht, K.T. and Fennell, M.L. (2001) Professional Work: A Sociological Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers .
23.
MacDonald, K. (1995) The Sociology of the Professions. London: Sage .
24.
Oswick, C. , Keenoy, T. and Grant, D. (1997) ‘Managerial Discourses: Words Speak Louder than Actions?’ , Journal of Applied Management Studies6(1): 5-12 .
25.
Pinnington, A. and Morris, T. (2002) ‘Transforming the Architect: Ownership Form and Archetype Change’ , Organization Studies23(2): 189-210 .
26.
Reed, M. (2000) ‘Alternative Professional Futures: Explaining the Dynamics and Forms of Professional Change in Advanced Capitalist Societies’ , Paper presented at EGOS Colloquium, Helsinki, 2-4 July.
27.
Royal Institute of British Architects (1999a) Meeting the Challenge: RIBA Strategy for Architecture and Architects 1999-2003. London: RIBA .
28.
Royal Institute of British Architects (1999b) Constructive Change: Proposals from the RIBA Practice Committee for Sustained Action in Response to Rethinking Construction, the report of the Government Task Force on Construction. London: RIBA .
29.
Spain, D. (2001) ‘Review of A. Adams and P. Tancred (2000) “Designing Women: Gender and the Architectural Profession”’ , Work and Occupations28(2): 263-264 .
30.
Wallace, J. (1995) ‘Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional Organizations’ , Administrative Science Quarterly40(2): 228-255 .
31.
Watson, T. (1995) ‘Rhetoric, Discourse and Argument in Organizational Sensemaking: A Reflexive Tale’ , Organization Studies16(5): 805-821 .
32.
Watson, T. (2002) ‘Should We Jump Off the Bandwagon, Better to Study Where it is Going?’ , International Studies of Management and Organization32(2): 93-105 .
33.
Winch, G. and Schneider, E. (1993) ‘Managing the Knowledge-based Organization: The Case of Architectural Practice’ , Journal of Management Studies30(6): 923-941 .
