Over the past decade, important changes have occurred in the occupational mix of the non-standard workforce, with a rising number of professionals and managers entering part-time and temporary forms of employment. However, while this shift is widely acknowledged, there remains some confusion regarding its consequences. One strand in the literature argues that, at higher occupational levels, the tendency for non-standard employees to experience marginalization at work will be far less pronounced or non-existent. A second strand argues that, regardless of occupational level, workers on part-time and temporary contracts will be treated unequally in various ways. In this article our aim is to explore this matter, drawing on data from the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. The analysis reveals that managers and professionals on non-standard contracts do become marginalized in terms of training opportunities and consultation at work, and that these outcomes are especially strong in the case of women. Finally, the managerial, national-level training policy and legal implications of the findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albert, S. and Bradley, K. (1997) Managing Knowledge: Experts, Agencies and Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
2.
Arulampalam, W. and Booth, A.L. (1998) ‘Training and Labour Market Flexibility: Is There A Trade Off?’ , British Journal of Industrial Relations36(4): 521-536 .
3.
Barling, J. and Gallagher, D.G. (1996) ‘Part-time Employment’, in C.L. Cooper and I.T. Robertson (eds) International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology pp. 243-277. Chichester: Wiley .
4.
Booth, A., Franesconi, M. and Frank, J. (2000) Contingent Jobs: Who Gets Them, What are They Worth and Do They Lead Anywhere?. Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research .
5.
Cam, S., Purcell, J. and Tailby, S. (2000) Contingent Employment in the UK, NUEWO project, draft report.
6.
Cohen, L. and Mallon, M. (1999) ‘The Transition from Organisational Employment to Portfolio Work: Perceptions of “Boundarylessness”’ , Work Employment and Society13(2): 329-352 .
7.
Cully, M., Woodland, S., O’Reilly, A. and Dix, G. (1999) Britain at Work: as Depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. London: Routledge .
8.
Department of Trade and Industry (1999) Workplace Employee Relations Survey: Cross-Section, 1998 [Computer File], Fourth edition. Colchester: The Data Archive [distributor], 22 December 1999, SN: 3955.
9.
Dex, S. and McCulloch, A. (1997) Flexible Employment. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
10.
Dex, S., Wills, J., Paterson, R. and Sheppard, E. (2000) ‘Freelance Workers and Contract Uncertainty: The Effects of Contractual Changes in the Television Industry’ , Work Employment and Society14(2): 283-305 .
11.
Edwards, C. and Robinson. O. (1999) ‘Managing Part-Timers in the Police Service: A Study of Inflexibility’ , Human Resource Management Journal9(4): 5-18 .
12.
Felstead, A. and Jewson, N. (eds) (1999) Global Trends in Flexible Labour. London: Macmillan .
13.
Felstead, A., Krahn, H. and Powell, M. (1999) ‘Young and Old at Risk: Comparative Trends in “Non-Standard” Patterns of Employment in Canada and the United Kingdom’ , International Journal of Manpower20(5): 277-296 .
14.
Forde, C. and Slater, G. (2001) ‘Just a temporary phenomenon? The rise and fall of temporary work in the UK’ , paper presented at the European Work and Employment Research Centre, Manchester School of Management, March.
15.
Gallie, D., White, M., Cheng, Y. and Tomlinson, M. (1998) Restructuring the Employment Relationship. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
16.
Green, F. (1999) ‘Training the Workers’, in P. Gregg and J. Wadsworth (eds) The State of Working Britain, pp. 127-146. Manchester University Press .
17.
Harvey, C. and Kanwal, S. (2000) ‘Self Employed IT Knowledge Workers and the Experience of Flexibility: Evidence from the United Kingdom’, in K. Purcell (ed.), Changing Boundaries in Employment. Bristol: Bristol Academic Press .
18.
Heery, E. and Salmon, J. (eds) (2000) The Insecure Workforce. London: Routledge .
19.
Herriot, P. and Pemberton, C. (1997) ‘Facilitating New Deals’ , Human Resource Management Journal7(1): 45-56 .
20.
Hunter, L., McGregor, A., MacInnes, J. and Sproull, A. (1993) ‘The “Flexible Firm”: Strategy and Segmentation’ , British Journal of Industrial Relations31(3): 383-407 .
21.
Industrial Relations Services (2001) ‘Part-time Working Options and Arrangements’ , IRS Employment Trends, 735, September.
22.
Labour Force Survey (1998) LFS Historical Supplement: Spring Quarters 1984-1998. London: Office for National Statistics .
23.
Legge, K. (1998) ‘Flexibility: The Gift-wrapping of Employment Degradation?’, in P. Sparrow and M. Marchington (eds), Human Resource Management: The New Agenda, pp. 286-295. London: Pitman .
24.
Mallon, M. and Duberley, J. (2000) ‘Managers and Professionals in the Contingent Workforce’ , Human Resource Management Journal10(1): 33-47 .
25.
Millward, N., Bryson, A. and Forth, J. (2000) All Change at Work: British Employment Relations 1980-98. London: Routledge .
26.
Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (1998) ‘The Business of Contingent Work: Growth and Restructuring in Chicago’s Temporary Employment Industry’ , Work Employment and Society12(4): 655-674 .
27.
Purcell, K. (2000) ‘Gendered employment insecurity?’, in E. Heery and J. Salmon (eds), The Insecure Workforce, pp. 112-139. London: Routledge .
28.
Rubery, J., Horrell, S. and Burchell, B. (1994) ‘Part-Time Work and Gender Inequality in The Labour Market’, in A. MacEwen Scott (ed.) Gender Segregation and Social Change, pp. 205-234. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
29.
Scott, A. (1994) Gender Segregation and Social Change. London: Oxford University Press .
30.
Simpson, R. (1998) ‘Presenteeism, Power and Organisational Change: Long Hours as a Career Barrier and the Impact on the Working Lives of Women Managers’ , British Journal of Management, 9: S37-S50 .
31.
Sparrow, P. (1998) ‘New Organisational Forms, Processes, Jobs and Psychological Contracts: Resolving HRM Issues’, in P. Sparrow and M. Marchington (eds), Human Resource Management: The New Agenda, pp. 117-141. London: Pitman .
32.
Storey, J. and Tate, W. (2000) ‘Management Development’, in S. Bach and K. Sisson (eds) Personnel Management, pp. 195-217. Oxford: Blackwell .
33.
Tilly, C. (1992) ‘Dualism in Part-time Employment’ , Industrial Relations31(2): 330-347 .
Walsh, J. (1999) ‘Myths and Counter-Myths: An Analysis of Part-time Female Employees and their Orientations to Work and Working Hours’ , Work Employment and Society12(2): 179-203 .
36.
Walsh, J. and Deery, S. (1999) ‘Understanding the Peripheral Workforce: Evidence from the Service Sector’ , Human Resources Management Journal9(2): 50-63 .
37.
Ward, K., Grimshaw, D., Rubery, J. and Beynon, H. (2001) ‘Dilemmas in the Management of Temporary Work Agency Staff’ , Human Resource Management Journal11(4): 3-21 .
38.
Warren, T. and Walters, P. (1998) ‘Appraising a Dichotomy: A Review of “Part-time/Full-time” in the Study of Women’s Employment in Britain’ , Gender Work and Organisation5(2): 102-118 .
