There has been a recent rise in employers derecognising unions. The oil and chemical industries have been identified as critical for the analysis and practice of derecognition. This paper presents data showing that major oil and chemical firms have, on the one hand, derecognised unions for key internal staff, but on the other hand, have enforced a centralised bargaining framework for their on-site contractors engaged in the out-sourced repair, maintenance and construction work. This centralised bargaining framework has strengthened the institutional position of trade unions. The paper analyses the key factors which have pushed the same employers to act in very different ways for the two sets of workers. It finds little evidence to support arguments that a strong anti-union culture in the industries underlay employers' actions. Rather the evidence suggests that management have acted pragmatically in response to pressing short-term economic pressures. The different approaches to unions for the two sets of workers have been guided by the different economic objectives facing employers and by the different historical position of unions in helping or hindering to secure those objectives. The conclusion considers the implications of these findings for the future of derecognition in the UK.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahlstrand, B. (1990) The Quest for Productivity: A Case Study of Fawley after Flanders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bacon, N. (1999) `Union Derecognition and the `New Human Relations': A Steel Industry Case Study', Work, Employment and Society, 13, 1.
3.
Ball, M. (1988) Rebuilding Construction, London: Routledge.
4.
Cibin, R. and Grant, R. (1996) `Restructuring among the World's Leading Oil Companies, 1980-92', British Journal of Management, 7: 283-308.
5.
Claydon, T. (1989) `Union Derecognition in Britain during the 1980s', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 27: 214-223.
6.
Claydon, T. (1996) `Union Derecognition: A Re-examination', in I. Beardwell (ed.), Contemporary Industrial Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151-174.
7.
Cross, M. (1989) `Contracting Out in Manufacturing Industry', in H. Ormuson and D. Ross (ed.), New Patterns of Work, St. Andrew's: St. Andrew's Press.
8.
Di Maggio, P. and Powell, W. (1991) `Introduction', in Di Maggio, P. and Powell, W. (ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, London: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Dobson, J. (1997) `The Effects of Multi-unionism', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 35:4, 547-566.
10.
Donaldson, L. (1985) In Defense of Organisation Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Employment Relations Act (1999) London: HMSO.
12.
Flanders, A. (1964) The Fawley Productivity Agreements, London: Faber.
13.
Fox, A. (1974) Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations, London: Faber and Faber.
14.
Gall, G. and McKay, S. (1994) `Trade Union Derecognition in Britain, 1988-94', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32: 433-448.
15.
Gallie, D. (1978) In Search of the New Working Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Giorgi, A. (1970) Psychology as a Human Science, New York: Harper and Row.
17.
Gregg, P. and Yates. (1991) `Changes in Trade Union and Wage Setting Arrangements in the 1980s', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29, 3: 361-376.
18.
House of Commons . (1994) Select Committee on Employment Report: The Future of Trade Unions, Appendix 3. London: HMSO, p. 195-199.
19.
Kelly, J. (1996) `Union Militancy and Social Partnership', in P. Ackers, C. Smith, and P. Smith (ed.), The New Workplace and Trade Unionism, London: Routledge, 77-109.
20.
Kochan, T. , H. Katz and R. McKersie (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations, New York: Basic Books.
21.
Korczynski, M. (1994) `Low Trust and Opportunism in Action', Journal of Industry Studies, 1:2, 43-64.
22.
Korczynski, M. (1996) `The Low Trust Route to Economic Development', Journal of Management Studies, 33:6, 787-808.
23.
Korczynski, M. (1997) `Centralisation of Collective Bargaining in a Decade of Decentralization'. Industrial Relations Journal, 28: 14-26.
24.
Korczynski, M. (1999) `The Restrictive Practices of Capital', Business History, 41, 3: 134-160.
25.
Labour Research Department . (1992) `The Union Derecognition Bandwagon', Labour Research, 81, 11: 6-8.
26.
Malloch, H. (1992) `Management Values and Change', in B. Towers (ed.), The Handbook of Human Resource Management, Oxford: Blackwell, 340-359.
27.
Millward, N. (1994) The New Industrial Relations?London: Policy Studies Institute.
28.
National Economic Development Office (NEDO) (1970) Large Industrial Sites, London: HMSO.
29.
National Economic Development Office (NEDO) (1976) Engineering Construction Performance, London: HMSO.
30.
Nichols, T. (1986) The British Worker Question, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
31.
Nichols, T. and Beynon, H. (1977) Living with Capitalism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
32.
Purcell, J. and Sisson, K. (1983) `Strategies and Practice in the Management of Industrial Relations', in G. S. Bain (Ed), Industrial Relations in Britain, Oxford: Blackwell, 95-120.
33.
Rainbird, H. (1991) Training Matters, Oxford: Blackwell.
34.
Ritson, N. H. (1997) `Unbinding Rationality: A Single-Union Agreement for Contractors at a UK Oil Refinery', Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12: 155-176.
35.
Ritson, N. H. (1999a) `Manufacturing Strategy in a UK Process Plant', Strategic Change, 8: 349-357.
36.
Ritson, N. H. (1999b) `Corporate Strategy and the Role of HRM', Employee Relations, 21: 159-175.
37.
Smith, P. and Morton, D. (1990) `A Change of Heart: Union Exclusion in the Provincial Newspaper Sector', Work, Employment and Society, 4: 105-124.
38.
Smith, P. and Morton, D. (1993) `Union Exclusion and the Decollectivization of Industrial Relations in Contemporary Britain', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31: 97-114.
39.
Towers, B. (1997) The Representation Gap, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Tuckman, A. (1998) ` “All Together Better?” Single Status and Union Recognition in the Chemical Industry', Employee Relations, 20: 132-147.
41.
Willey, B. (1986) Union Recognition and Representation in Engineering, Engineering Employers' Federation, London.
42.
Wood, S. , (1997) `Statutory Union Recognition', Research Report No. 17, Institute of Personnel and Development, London.
43.
Woolfson, C. , Foster, J, and Beck, M. (1996) Paying for the Piper, London: Mansell.
44.
Young, K. (1986) `The Management of Craft Work: A Case Study of an Oil Refinery', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 24: 361-380.
45.
Young, K. (1992) Management and Flexibility - A Case Study of an Oil Refinery. PhD thesis, University of East London.
