This investigation provided descriptive information on the intellectual and achievement characteristics of 906 students with learning disabilities and 836 students who were referred for special services but deemed not eligible. The findings indicated that students with learning disabilities achieved at a level significantly below students who were referred and not labeled and were more frequently below grade level in core achievement areas. Furthermore, students with learning disabilities were more likely to exhibit a severe discrepancy between expected and actual achievement levels than their nonhandicapped peers. These findings confirmed the conclusions from previous studies, indicating that students with learning disabilities tend to be the lowest of the low achievers.
AlgozzineB., & YsseldykeJ.E. (1983). Learning disabilities as a subset of school failure: The oversophistication of a concept. Exceptional Children, 50, 242–246.
3.
AlgozzineB., & YsseldykeJ.E. (1986). The future of the LD field: Screening and diagnosis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 394–398.
4.
BradenJ.P. (1987). A comparison of regression and standard score discrepancy methods for learning disabilities identification: Effects on racial representation. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 23–29.
5.
ChinnP.C., & HughesS. (1987). Representation of minority students in special classes. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 41–46.
6.
ConeT.E., & WilsonL.R. (1981). Quantifying a severe discrepancy: A critical analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 359–371.
7.
ConeT.E.WilsonL.R.BradleyC.M., & ReeseJ.H. (1985). Characteristics of LD students in Iowa: An empirical investigation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 211–220.
8.
FrankenbergerW., & HarperJ. (1987). States’ criteria and procedures for identifying learning disabled children: A comparison of 1981182 and 1985/86 guidelines. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 118–121.
9.
Indiana Department of Education, Division of Special Education. (1986). Indiana's learning disability definition and eligibility criteria: Guidelines for implementation.Indianapolis: Indiana Special Education Administrators’ Services.
10.
KaufmanA.S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R.New York: John Wiley.
11.
KirkS.A., & ElkinsJ. (1975). Characteristics of children enrolled in Child Service Demonstration Centers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 630–837.
12.
McLeskeyJ., & WaldronN.L. (1988). The impact of the LD guidelines on the identification of students with learning disabilities in Indiana: Final report.Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Education, Division of Special Education.
13.
McNuttG. (1986). The status of learning disabilities in the states: Consensus or controversy?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 12–16.
14.
MercerC.HughesC., & MercerA. (1985). Learning disabilities definitions used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 630–637.
15.
NormanC.A., & ZigmondN. (1980). Characteristics of children labeled and served as learning disabled in school systems affiliated with Child Service Demonstration Centers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 16–21.
16.
ShepardL.A. (1982). Assessment of learning disabilities. ERIC/TM Report 84.Princeton, NJ: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation—ETS
17.
ShepardL.A.SmithM.L., & VojirC.P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. AmericanEducational Research Journal, 20, 309–331.
18.
ShinnM.R.YsseldykeJ.E.DenoS.L., & TindalG.A. (1986). A comparison of differences between students labeled learning disabled and low achieving on measures of classroom performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 545–552.
19.
SmithM.L., & ShepardL.A. (1987). What doesn't work: Explaining policies of retention in the early grades. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 129–134.
20.
SpruillJ., & BeckB. (1986). Relationship between the WRAT and WRAT-R. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 357–360.
21.
WilsonL.R. (1985). Large-scale learning disability identification: The reprieve of a concept. Exceptional Children, 52, 44–51.
22.
YsseldykeJ.E.AlgozzineB.RicheyL., & GradenJ. (1982). Declaring students eligible for learning disabilities services: Why bother with the data?Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 5, 37–43.
23.
YsseldykeJ.E.AlgozzineB.ShinnM.R., & McGueM. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified as learning disabled. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.
