This investigation examined the changes that take place in aptitude and achievement discrepancies of LD students over time. Using a T-score discrepancy formula, four distinct subgroups within the sample were identified and changing patterns of aptitude-achievement discrepancy were associated with each subgroup. Implications for the number and type of students who will eventually receive special educational services are discussed.
ConeT.E., & WilsonL.R. (1981). Quantifying a severe discrepancy: A critical analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 359–371.
4.
ConeT.E.WilsonL.R.BradleyC.M., & ReeseJ.H. (1985). Characteristics of LD students in Iowa: An empirical investigation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 211-219.
5.
HannaG.S.DyckN.T., & HolenM.C. (1979). Objective analysis of achievement-aptitude discrepancies in LD classification. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2,32-38.
6.
JastakJ.T.JastakS.R., & BijouS. (1976). Wide Range Achievement Test (Rev. ed.). Wilmington, DE: Guidance Associates.
7.
PerlmutterB.F., & ParusM.J. (1983). Identifying children with learning disabilities: A comparison of diagnostic procedures across school districts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 321–328.
8.
PoplinM.S. (1981). The severely learning disabled: Neglected or forgotten? Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 330–335.
9.
ShepardL., & SmithM.L. (1981, February). Evaluation of the identification of perceptual communicative disorders in Colorado: Final report.Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Laboratory of Educational Research.
10.
ShepardL.SmithM.L.& VojirC.P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. Academic Therapy, 20, 309–331.
11.
WechslerD. (1974). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised.New York: Psychological Corp.
