Study Behavior as a Function of Metacognitive Knowledge about Critical Task Variables: An Investigation of above Average,Average,and Learning Disabled Readers

Abstract

Through an interview, above average, average and LD readers in the intermediate grades were assessed on their metacognitive knowledge about vocabulary difficulty and passage organization in relation to the ease of studying a passage. After 3 weeks, they were given a pair of passages with difficult and easy vocabulary and a pair of organized and disorganized passages to study. Of interest is the consistency between the children's expressed metacognition and their subsequent studying behaviors. As expected, good readers possess substantially more metacognitive knowledge than both average and LD readers about the role of vocabulary difficulty and passage organization on the ease of studying a passage. Concerning study behaviors, only good readers studied the disorganized passage longer, while only LD readers studied the passage with difficult vocabulary longer. The results challenge the assumption that LD readers lack metacognition about reading. The results also raised methodological and theoretical issues with important implications for both researchers and practitioners.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

(1982). An evaluation of the role of metacognitive deficits in learning disabilities. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 27–35.

Baker

, & Brown

A.L.

(1984). Metacognition skills of reading. In Pearson

D.P.

(Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.

Borkowski

J.G.

Reid

M.K.

, & Kurtz

B.E.

(1984). Metacognition and mental retardation: Paradigmatic, theoretical and applied perspectives. In Brooks

P.H.

Sperber

& McCauley

(Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown

(1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In Glaser

(Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown

A.L.

(1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In Spiro

R.J.

Bruce

B.B.

& Brewer

W.F.

(Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453–481). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown

A.L.

& Ferrara

R.A.

(in press). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Academic Press.

Cavanaugh

J.C.

, & Perlmutter

(1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53,11-28.

Danner

F.W.

(1976). Children's understanding of intersentence organization in the recall of short descriptive passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 174–183.

Feuerstein

(1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performance. Baltimore: University Park Press. Meichenbaum

, Burland

, Gruson

, & Cameron, R. (In press). Metacognitive assessment. In S. Yussen (Ed.), Growth of insight. New York: Academic Press.

10.

Myers

, & Paris

S.G.

(1978). Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680–690.

11.

Owings

R.A.

Peterson

G.A.

Bransford

J.D.

Morris

C.D.

, & Stein

B.S.

(1980). Spontaneous monitoring and regulation of learning: A comparison of successful and less successful fifth graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 250–256.

12.

Paris

S.G.

, & Myers

(1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 5–22.

13.

Schallert

D.L.

, & Kleiman

G.M.

(1979, June). Some reasons why teachers are easier to understand than textbooks (Reading Education Report No. 9). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.

14.

Singer

(1978). Active comprehension: From answering to asking questions. The Reading Teacher, 31, 901–908.

15.

Vygotsky

L.S.

(1978). In Cole

John-Steiner

Scribner

& Souberman

(Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

16.

Winograd

(1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 14 (4), 404–425.

17.

Wong

B.Y.L.

Wong

, & LeMare

L.J.

(1982). The effects of knowledge of criterion tasks on the comprehension and recall of normally-achieving and learningdisabled children. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 119–126.