The purpose of this study was to determine whether learning disabled readers' impaired verbal coding was related to storage and/or retrieval operations. To this end, learning disabled and skilled readers viewed nonsense pictures without names or with names that emphasized the semantic aspects of the picture or names that were not associated with the pictorial representation. An analysis of first-choice responses on a probe-recall task indicated that skilled readers were superior to disabled readers on the semantic training conditions. No significant recall differences occurred between reading groups on unnamed and named-nonassociated conditions. An analysis of second-choice responses (when the first choice response was incorrect) on several dependent measures found minimal recall advantage for skilled compared to disabled readers. An analysis of memory trace structure (Tulving & Watkins, 1975) suggested that ability groups vary in the coding strategies they use to represent information and that such differences may influence item availability during first-choice responding. Results were interpreted as suggesting that disabled readers' verbal coding operations reflect a reduction in the availability, as opposed to accessibility, of previously stored information.
BerchD. (1977). Absolute judgment of recency: A reexamination of children's short-term memory data. Psychological Bulletin, 84,1261-1266.
3.
BowerG. (1967). A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In SpenceK.W. & AndersonN. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
4.
BrainerdC.J. (1985). Model-based approaches to storage and retrieval development. In BrainerdC.J. & PressleyM. (Eds.), Basic processes in memory development: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 142–207). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5.
BrainerdC.J.HoweM.L., & DesrochersA. (1982). The general theory of two stage learning: A mathematical review with illustrations from memory development. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 634–665.
6.
CeciS.LeaS., & RingstromM. (1980). Coding process in normal and learning disabled children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 785–795.
EstesW.K. (1976). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37–64.
9.
FlavellJ.BeachD., & ChinskyJ. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in memory tasks as a function of age. Child Development, 32, 283–299.
10.
GlanzerM. (1982). Short-term memory. In PuffC.R. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition (pp. 63–93). New York: Academic Press.
HoweM.L.BrainerdC.J., & KingmaJ. (in press). Storage-retrieval processes of normal and learning disabled children: A stages-of-analysis of picture-word effects. Child Development.
13.
KlatzkyR., & RafnelK. (1976). Labelling effects on memory for nonsense pictures. Memory and Cognition, 4, 717–720.
14.
KolersP., & GonzalesE. (1980). Memory for words, synonyms, and translations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6,53-65.
15.
LachmanR., & LachmanJ.L. (1980). Picture naming: Retrieval and activation of long-term memory. In PoonL.W. (Ed.), New directions in memory and aging (pp. 313–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
PaivioA. (1983). Strategies in language learning. In M. Pressley & J. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 189–210). New York: Springer-Verlag.
19.
PaivioA., & DesrochersA. (1980). A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 388–399.
20.
ProctorR., & AmblerB. (1975). Effects of rehearsal strategy on memory for spacing and frequency. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 640–647.
21.
RossB., & YounissJ. (1969). Ordering of nonverbal items in children's recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 20–32.
22.
ShankweilerD.LibermanI.MarkI.FowlerC., & FischerF. (1979). The speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 531–545.
23.
SnodgrassJ.G. (1984). Concepts and their surface structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 3–22.
24.
SwansonH.L. (1977). Nonverbal visual short-term memory as a function of age and dimensionality in learning disabled children. Child Development, 48, 51–55.
25.
SwansonH.L. (1978). Verbal encoding effects on the visual short-term memory of learning disabled and normal readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 539–544.
26.
SwansonH.L. (1984). Semantic and visual memory codes in learning disabled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37,124-140.
27.
SwansonH.L.(In press a). Multiple coding processes in learning disabled and skilled readers. In S.J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
SwansonH.L. (In press b). Verbal coding deficits in learning disabled readers: Remembering pictures and words. In H.L. Swanson (Ed.), Memory and learning disabilities: Advances in learning and behavior disabilities.Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
29.
Te LindeJ. (1982). Picture-word differences in decision latency. A test of common-coding assumptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 8, 584–598.
30.
TorgesenJ., & GoldmanI. (1977). Verbal rehearsal and short-term memory in reading disabled children. Child Development, 48, 56–60.
31.
TorgesenJ.K., & HouckD.C. (1980). Processing deficiencies of learning-disabled children who perform poorly on the Digit Span Test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72,141-160.
32.
TulvingE., & PearlstoneZ. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5,381-391.
33.
TulvingE., & ThomsonD.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80,1-5.
VanderplasJ., & GarvinI. (1959). The associative values of random shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57,147-154.
36.
VellutinoF.R., & ScanlonD.M. (1982). Verbal processing in poor and normal readers. In C. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.), Verbal processes in children (pp. 189–264). New York: Springer-Verlag.
37.
VellutinoF.R., & ScanlonD.M. (in press). Verbal memory in poor and normal readers: Developmental differences in the use of linguistic codes. In D. Gray & J. Kavanaugh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia.Parkton, MD: York Press.
38.
VellutinoF.R.StegerJ.A.DeSettoL., & PhillipsF. (1975). Immediate and delayed recognition of visual stimuli in poor and normal readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 223–232.
39.
WatkinsM.J. (1974). The concept and measurement of primary memory. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 695–711.
40.
WatkinsM.J. (1979). Engrams as cuegrams and forgeting as cue overload: A cueing approach to the structure of memory. In PuffR. (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 347–374). New York: Academic Press.
41.
WilkinsonA.C. (1982). Theoretical and methodological analysis of partial knowledge. Developmental Review, 2, 274–304.
