The results from research in learning and reading disabilities generally fail to confirm a consistent relationship between reading performance and visual perception, auditory perception, or modality preference. Clinical observations and teachers' opinions do, however, suggest the presence of such a relationship. This article reviews the research and suggests factors including the presence of Type III error, defined as asking the wrong research questions, that may explain the discrepancies among research studies, and between research results and clinical experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArterJ.A., & JenkinsJ.R. (1977). Examining the benefits and prevalence of modality considerations in special education. Journal of Special Education, 11,281-298.
2.
BatemanB. (1968). The efficacy of an auditory and a visual method of first grade reading instruction with auditory and visual learners. In SmithJ. (Ed.), Perception and reading.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3.
BoderE. (1971). Developmental dyslexia: Prevailing diagnostic concepts and a new diagnostic approach. In MyklebustH.R. (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities(Vol. 2) (pp. 293–321). New York: Grune & Stratton.
4.
DencklaM.B. (1972). Clinical syndromes in learning disabilities: The case for “splitting” vs. “lumping.” Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5,401-406.
5.
DoehringD.G. (1978). The tangled web of behavioral research on developmental dyslexia. In BentonA.L. & PearlD. (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 125–135). London: Oxford University Press.
6.
FernaldG.M. (1943). Remedial techniques in basic school subjects.New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
FisherD.F., & FrankfurterA. (1977). Normal and disabled readers can locate and Identify letters: Where's the perceptual deficit? Journal of Reading Behavior, 9,31-43.
8.
FiskJ.L., & RourkeB.P. (1979). Identification of subtypes of learning-disabled children at three age levels: A neuropsychological, multivariate approach. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 289–310.
9.
FletcherJ.M., & SatzP. (1979). Unitary deficit hypothesis of reading disabilities: Has Vellutino led us astray? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12,155-159.
10.
FrostigM.LeFeverD.W., & WhittleseyJ.R.B. (1964). The Marianne Frostig Developmental Test of Visual Perception.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
11.
GibsonE.J., & LevinH.(1975). The psychology of reading.Cambridge, MA: The M.l.T. Press.
12.
GrossK., & RothenbergS. (1979). An examination of methods used to test the visual perceptual deficit hypothesis of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12,670-677.
13.
GuptaR.CeciS.J., & SlaterA.M. (1978). Visual discrimination in good and poor readers. The Journal of Special Education, 12,409–415.
14.
GuralnickM.J. (1978). The application of single subject research design to the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11,415-421.
15.
GuthrieJ.T., & GoldbergH.K. (1972). Visual sequential memory in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 41–46.
16.
HammillD.D., & LarsenS.C. (1974). The relationship of selected auditory perceptual skills and reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 429–435.
17.
HammillD.D., & McNuttG. (1981). The correlates of reading. (Pro-Ed Monograph #1). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
18.
HarberJ.R. (1980). Auditory perception and reading: Another look. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3 (3), 19–29.
19.
HarberJ.R. (1981). Learning disability research: How far have we progressed? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 372–382.
20.
HareB.A. (1977). Perceptual deficits are not a cue to reading problems in second grade. The Reading Teacher, 30, 624–628.
21.
HinshelwoodJ. (1917). Congenital word blindness.London:H.K. Lewis.
22.
HirshorenA. (1969). A comparison of the predictive validity of the Revised Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale and the ITPA. Exceptional Children, 35, 517–521.
23.
KampwirthT.J., & BatesM. (1980). Modality preference and teaching method: A review of the research. Academic Therapy, 15, 597–605.
24.
KassC.E. (1966). Psycholinguistic disabilities of children with reading problems. Exceptional Children, 32,533-539.
25.
KavaleK. (1981). The relationship between auditory perceptual skills and reading ability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14,539-546.
26.
KavaleK. (1982). Meta-analysis of the relationship between visual perceptual skills and reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15,42-51.
27.
KavaleK.& FornessS.R. (1985). The science of learning disabilities.San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
28.
KavaleK., & FornessS.R. (in press). A matter of substance over style: A quantitative synthesis assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children.
29.
KavaleK., & NyeC. (1981). Identification criteria for learning disabilities: A survey of the research literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4,383-388.
30.
KirkJ., & MillerM.L. (1985). Reliability and validity in quantitative research. Sage University Paper Series on Qualitative Applications In the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
31.
KirkS.A., & ChalfantJ.C. (1984). Academic and developmental learning disabilities.Denver: Love Publishing.
32.
KirkS.A.SenfG., & LarsenR. (1981). Current issues in learning disabilities. In W.M. Cruickshank (Ed.), Bridges to tomorrow: Vol. 2. The best of ACLD. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
33.
LaheyB.B., & LeftonL.A. (1976). Discrimination of letter combinations in good and poor readers. Journal of Special Education, 10, 205–210.
34.
LaheyB.B., & McNeesM.P. (1975). Letter discrimination errors in kindergarten through third grade: Assessment and operant training. Journal of Special Education, 9,191-199.
35.
LarsenS.C., & HammillD.C. (1975). The relationship of selected visual perceptual abilities to school learning. Journal of Special Education, 9, 281–291.
36.
LyleJ.G., & GoyenJ.D. (1968). Visual recognition, developmental lag, and strephosymbolia in reading retardation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 73,25-29.
37.
MacioneJ. (1969). Psycholinguistic correlates of reading disabilities as defined by the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Dakota.
38.
MalmquistE. (1958). Factors related to reading disability in the first grade of the elementary school.Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
39.
MattisS. (1978). Dyslexia syndromes: A working hypothesis that works. In BentonA.L. & PearlD. (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 43–58). London: Oxford University Press.
40.
MattisS.FrenchJ.H., & RapinI. (1975). Dyslexia in children and young adults: Three independent neuropsychological syndromes. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 17,150-163.
41.
McKinneyD. (1984). The search for subtypes of specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 43–51.
42.
McLeodJ. (1976). A reaction to the psycholinguistics In the schools. In P.L. Newcomer & D.D. Hammill (Eds.), Psycholinguistics in the schools.Columbus, OH: Charles E Merrill.
43.
McLeodJ., & GreenoughP. (1980). The importance of sequencing as an aspect of short-term memory in good and poor spellers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13,255-261.
44.
MeyersM.J. (1980). The significance of learning modalities, modes of instructions, and verbal feedback for learning to recognize words. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3,62-69.
45.
MeyersM.J. (1983). Information processing and the Slingerland Screening Tests. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16,150-153.
46.
MitroffI.I., & FeatheringhamT.R. (1974). On systemic problem solving and the error of the third kind. Behavioral Science, 19,383-393.
47.
MonroeM. (1932). Children who cannot read.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
OlsonA.V. (1966). School achievement, reading ability, and specific visual perception skills in the third grade. The Reading Teacher, 19,490-492.
49.
OlsonJ.L., & MealorD.J. (1981). Learning disabilities identification: Do researchers have the answer? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 4, 389–392.
50.
OrtonS.T. (1937). Reading, writing, and speech problems in children.New York: Norton.
51.
RichieD., & AtenJ. (1976). Auditory retention of nonverbal and verbal sequential stimuli in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9,312-318.
52.
RingB. (1976). Effect of input organization on auditory short term memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9,591-595.
53.
RobinsonH.M. (1972). Visual and auditory modalities related to methods for beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 7–39.
54.
RugelR.P. (1974). WISC subtest scores of disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 57–64.
55.
SamuelsS.J., & AndersonR.H. (1973). Visual recognition memory, paired-associate learning, and reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65,160-167.
56.
SatzP., & Van Nostrand, G.K. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: An evaluation of theory. In SatzP. & RossJ. (Eds.), The disabled learner: Early detection and intervention (pp. 121–148). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Rotterdam University Press.
57.
SenfG.M.(1976). Future research needs in learning disabilities. In R.P. Anderson & C.G. Halcomb (Eds.), Learning disability/Minimal brain dysfunction (pp. 249–267). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
58.
SenfG.M., & FreundlP.C. (1971). Memory and attention factors in specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 94–106.
59.
SmithC.M. (1971). The relationship of reading method and reading achievement of ITPA sensory-modalities. Journal of Special Education, 5,143-149.
60.
SpringC., & CappsC. (1974). Encoding speed, rehearsal, and probed recall of dyslexic boys. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 780–786.
61.
SwansonH.L. (1977). Nonverbal visual short-term memory as a function of age and dimensionality in learning-disabled children. Child Development, 48,51-55.
62.
TarverS.G., & DawsonM.M. (1978). Modality preference and the teaching of reading: A review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11,5-17.
63.
TorgesenJ.K. (1975). Problems and prospects in the study of learning disabilities. In M. Hetherington & J. Hagen (Eds.), Review of Child Development Research(Vol. 5) (pp. 385–440). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
64.
TorgesenJ.K. (1978). Performance of reading disabled children on serial memory tasks: Selective review of recent research. Reading Research Quarterly, 1,57-87.
65.
TorgesenJ.K., & DiceC. (1980). Characteristics of research on learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 531–535.
66.
TorgesenJ.K., & GoldmanT. (1977). Verbal rehearsal and short term memory in second grade reading-disabled children. Child Development, 48,56–61.
67.
TorgesenJ.K., & HouckD.G. (1980). Processing deficiencies of learning disabled children who perform poorly on the digit span test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72,141-160.
68.
VellutinoF.R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research.Cambridge, MA: M.l.T. Press.
69.
VellutinoF.R.SmithH.StegerJ.A., & KamanM. (1975). Reading disability: Age differences and the perceptual deficit hypothesis. Child Development 46487-493.
70.
VellutinoF.R.StegerB.M.MoyerS.C.HardingC.J., & NilesJ.A. (1977). Has the perceptual deficit hypothesis led us astray? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10,375-385.
71.
VernonM.D. (1974). Visual perception relating to reading-information sources. The Reading Teacher, 28,184-186.
72.
WaughR.P. (1973). Relationship between modality preference and performance. Exceptional Children, 39,465-469.
73.
WillefordJ.A. (1976). Central auditory function in children with learning disabilities. Auditory and Hearing Education, 2,12-20.
74.
WillefordJ.A., & BillgerJ.M. (1978). Auditory perception in children with learning disabilities. In J. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of clinical audiology (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
