Health apps offer promising support for people with diabetes; however, the retention rates are low. Team-based apps and gamification can increase engagement and contribute to sustained use.
Objective
This pilot study explored how a team-based gamification app can support diabetes self-care.
Methods
Individuals with diabetes were introduced to a team-based gamification app that encourages the development of new habits. After 6 weeks of use, participants completed a questionnaire on system satisfaction, ease of use, enjoyment, usefulness for self-care, and burden, using a five-point scale. Qualitative data were also collected.
Results
Of the 32 participants, 65% were satisfied, 81% found it useful for lifestyle management, and 71% found it useful for exercise. The team system and challenge-tracking features were the most useful. Participants stated that the app provided emotional support and motivated healthy habits through social comparison; however, they also reported confusion in aligning team and individual needs.
Conclusions
The team-based gamification health app provided emotional support by team members who shared the same goals and motivated healthy lifestyle habits through social comparison.
Young-HymanDde GrootMHill-BriggsF, et al.Psychosocial care for people with diabetes: a position statement of the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care2016; 39: 2126–2140.
3.
SnoekFJBremmerMAHermannsN. Constructs of depression and distress in diabetes: time for an appraisal. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol2015; 3: 450–460.
4.
TangTSBrownMBFunnellMM, et al.Social support, quality of life, and self-care behaviors among African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ2008; 34: 266–276.
5.
StopfordRWinkleyKIsmailK. Social support and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of observational studies. Patient Educ Couns2013; 93: 549–558.
6.
HouCCarterBHewittJ, et al.Do Mobile phone applications improve glycemic control (HbA1c) in the self-management of diabetes? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE of 14 randomized trials. Diabetes Care2016; 39: 2089–2095.
7.
HanMLeeE. Effectiveness of Mobile health application use to improve health behavior changes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Healthc Inform Res2018; 24: 207–226.
8.
TrawleySBaptistaSBrowneJL, et al.The use of mobile applications among adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: results from the second MILES-Australia (MILES-2) study. Diabetes Technol Ther2017; 19: 730–738.
9.
ZhangYLiXLuoS, et al.Use, perspectives, and attitudes regarding diabetes management mobile apps among diabetes patients and diabetologists in China: national web-based survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2019; 7: e12658.
10.
InagakiSKatoKAbeK, et al.Relationship between diabetes self-management and the use of health care apps: a cross-sectional study. ACI Open2023; 07: e23–ee9.
11.
HelanderEKaipainenKKorhonenI, et al.Factors related to sustained use of a free Mobile app for dietary self-monitoring with photography and peer feedback: retrospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res2014; 16: e109.
12.
MustafaASAliNDhillonJS, et al.User engagement and abandonment of mHealth: a cross-sectional survey. Healthcare (Basel)2022; 10: 221.
13.
LauEYMitchellMSFaulknerG. Long-term usage of a commercial mHealth app: a “multiple-lives” perspective. Front Public Health2022; 10: 914433.
14.
LevineDMCoZNewmarkLP, et al.Design and testing of a mobile health application rating tool. npj Digital Medicine2020; 3: 74.
15.
PerskiOBlandfordAWestR, et al.Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Transl Behav Med2017; 7: 254–267.
16.
ShortCEDeSmetAWoodsC, et al.Measuring engagement in eHealth and mHealth behavior change interventions: viewpoint of methodologies. J Med Internet Res2018; 20: e292.
17.
DeterdingSDixonDKhaledR, et al.From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. In: Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: envisioning future media environments. Tampere, Finland: Association for Computing Machinery, 2011, pp.9–15.
18.
SailerMHenseJUMayrSK, et al.How gamification motivates: an experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput Human Behav2017; 69: 371–380.
19.
BitriánPBuilICatalánS. Enhancing user engagement: the role of gamification in mobile apps. J Bus Res2021; 132: 170–185.
20.
AsadzandiSSedghiSBigdeliS, et al.A systematized review on diabetes gamification. Med J Islam Repub Iran2020; 34: 168.
21.
PatelMSSmallDSHarrisonJD, et al.Effect of behaviorally designed gamification with social incentives on lifestyle modification among adults with uncontrolled diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open2021; 4: e2110255–e.
22.
SardiLIdriAFernández-AlemánJL. A systematic review of gamification in e-health. J Biomed Inform2017; 71: 31–48.
23.
ZhangMWBHoRCM. Rapid cross platform healthcare gaming design and implementation: the cost effective methodology. Technol Health Care2016; 24: 973–976.
24.
RyanRDeciE. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol2000; 55: 68–78.
25.
PatelMSSmallDSHarrisonJD, et al.Effectiveness of behaviorally designed gamification interventions with social incentives for increasing physical activity among overweight and obese adults across the United States: the STEP UP randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med2019; 179: 1624–1632.
26.
BradyVJMathew JosephNJuH-H. Impact of gaming (gamification) on diabetes self-care behaviors and glycemic outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes. The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care2023; 49: 493–511.
27.
KerfootBPGagnonDRMcMahonGT, et al.A team-based online game improves blood glucose control in veterans with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care2017; 40: 1218–1225.
28.
HofmannSGAsnaaniAVonkIJ, et al.The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res2012; 36: 427–440.
29.
Kurnik MesaričKPajekJLogar ZakrajšekB, et al.Cognitive behavioral therapy for lifestyle changes in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep2023; 13: 12793.
30.
NaikADPalmerNPetersenNJ, , et al.Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in diabetes mellitus group clinics: randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med2011; 171: 453–459.
31.
RitchieNDSauderKAKaufmannPG, et al.Patient-centered goal-setting in the national diabetes prevention program: a pilot study. Diabetes Care2021; 44: 2464–2469.
32.
McAndrewLMNapolitanoMAPogachLM, et al.The impact of self-monitoring of blood glucose on a behavioral weight loss intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ2013; 39: 397–405.
33.
Yom-TovEFeraruGKozdobaM, et al.Encouraging physical activity in patients with diabetes: intervention using a reinforcement learning system. J Med Internet Res2017; 19: e338.
34.
BanduraA. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process1991; 50: 248–287.
35.
BanduraA. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav2004; 31: 143–164.
36.
KönigLMAttigCFrankeT, et al.Barriers to and facilitators for using nutrition apps: systematic review and conceptual framework. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2021; 9: e20037.
37.
KönigLMSproesserGSchuppHT, et al.Describing the process of adopting nutrition and fitness apps: behavior stage model approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2018; 6: e55.
38.
HeislerM. Overview of peer support models to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes. Diabetes Spectr2007; 20: 214–221.
39.
DennisC-L. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud2003; 40: 321–332.
40.
SullivanANLachmanME. Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: a review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Front Public Health2016; 4: 289.
41.
EckerstorferLVTanzerNKVogrincic-HaselbacherC, et al.Key elements of mHealth interventions to successfully increase physical activity: meta-regression. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2018; 6: e10076.
42.
HartzlerALVenkatakrishnanAMohanS, et al.Acceptability of a team-based mobile health (mHealth) application for lifestyle self-management in individuals with chronic illnesses. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2016; 2016: 3277–3281.
43.
VermaIGopaldasaniVJainV, et al.The impact of peer coach-led type 2 diabetes mellitus interventions on glycaemic control and self-management outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes2022; 16: 719–735.
44.
FisherBJGosselinkCA. Enhancing the efficacy and empowerment of older adults through group formation. J Gerontol Soc Work2008; 51: 2–18.
45.
FilhoETenenbaumGYangY. Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport. J Sports Sci2015; 33: 641–653.
46.
RileyWTRiveraDEAtienzaAA, et al.Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?Transl Behav Med2011; 1: 53–71.
47.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonM, et al.The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med2013; 46: 81–95.
48.
PriesterrothLGrammesJHoltzK, et al.Gamification and behavior change techniques in diabetes self-management apps. J Diabetes Sci Technol2019; 13: 954–958.
49.
ThompsonDMBoothLMooreD, et al.Peer support for people with chronic conditions: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res2022; 22: 427.
50.
MarkusHRKitayamaS. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev1991; 98: 224–253.
51.
LitchmanMLOserTKHodgsonL, et al.In-Person and technology-mediated peer support in diabetes care: a systematic review of reviews and gap analysis. Diabetes Educ2020; 46: 230–241.
52.
SteffensNKLaRueCJHaslamC, et al.Social identification-building interventions to improve health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev2021; 15: 85–112.
53.
LiuJThomasJMHiggsS. The relationship between social identity, descriptive social norms and eating intentions and behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol2019; 82: 217–230.
54.
StevensMReesTCoffeeP, et al.A social identity approach to understanding and promoting physical activity. Sports Med (Auckland, Nz)2017; 47: 1911–1918.
55.
McNeillLHKreuterMWSubramanianSV. Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and evidence. Soc Sci Med2006; 63: 1011–1022.
56.
EmbuldeniyaGVeinotPBellE, et al.The experience and impact of chronic disease peer support interventions: a qualitative synthesis. Patient Educ Couns2013; 92: 3–12.
57.
LiuZWangCYangD, et al.High engagement in mobile peer support is associated with better glycemic control in type 1 diabetes: a real-world study. J Diabetes Investig2022; 13: 1914–1924.
58.
RosyidaRPertiwiAPangastutiH. The effectiveness of a smartphone-based online peer group on type II diabetes mellitus patients self-empowerment in a primary healthcare center in Indonesia. Revista Ciências Em Saúde2020; 10: 137–143.
59.
ArigoD (ed). Social Comparison Theory in the Context of Chronic Illness: Predictors and Consequences of Target Selection among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes 2012.
60.
DaleJCaramlauISturtJ, et al.Telephone peer-delivered intervention for diabetes motivation and support: the telecare exploratory RCT. Patient Educ Couns2009; 75: 91–98.
61.
SmithSMPaulGKellyA, et al.Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br Med J2011; 342: d715.
62.
DanOMLaiJW (eds). How am I doing? The effects of gamification and social sharing on user engagement. In: Proc 68th ann conf American assoc for public opinion research, 2013.
63.
LaucknerHMHutchinsonSL. Peer support for people with chronic conditions in rural areas: a scoping review. Rural Remote Health2016; 16: 3601.
64.
FossRFischerKLampmanMA, et al.Disparities in diabetes care: differences between rural and urban patients within a large health system. Ann Fam Med2023; 21: 234–239.
Meyerowitz-KatzGRaviSArnoldaL, et al.Rates of attrition and dropout in app-based interventions for chronic disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e20283.
67.
AmagaiSPilaSKaatAJ, et al.Challenges in participant engagement and retention using Mobile health apps: literature review. J Med Internet Res2022; 24: e35120.
68.
LiZLongYYangQ, et al.Smartphone-based interventions in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Technol Health Care2023; 31: 1935–1948.
DennisonLMorrisonLConwayG, et al.Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res2013; 15: e86.
71.
HoyleRDasSKapadiaA, et al.Was my message read?: Privacy and Signaling on Facebook Messenger 2017. 3838–42 p.
72.
MorrisonLGHargoodCPejovicV, et al.The effect of timing and frequency of push notifications on usage of a smartphone-based stress management intervention: an exploratory trial. PLOS ONE2017; 12: e0169162.
73.
RyanRMDeciEL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol2000; 25: 54–67.
74.
SenécalCNouwenAWhiteD. Motivation and dietary self-care in adults with diabetes: are self-efficacy and autonomous self-regulation complementary or competing constructs?Health Psychol2000; 19: 452–457.
75.
ShigakiCKruseRLMehrD, et al.Motivation and diabetes self-management. Chronic Illn2010; 6: 202–214.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
