Abstract
This patient commentary addresses the absence of rigorous placebo- or sham-controlled trials for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and discusses whether its therapeutic effects are partly attributable to non-seizure components like anesthesia and subthreshold electrical stimulation. It proposes noninferiority trials comparing ECT and non-ictal treatments such as subconvulsive electrotherapies and psychotherapeutic anesthesia to investigate these components and evaluate potential alternatives with lesser adverse effects.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
