The ruling n. 38485, 20 June 2019, of the Italian Supreme Court, III criminal section, addressed by the perspective of the law the very sensitive and new issue of telemedicine.
Objective
This commentary deals with the issue of authorization of telemedicine activities by the health authority, starting from the Italian Court of Criminal Cassation, III section, decision n. 38485/2019. The case law explored the authorization of a health point, which carries out telemedicine services.
Methods
Starting from the perspective discussed by Italian health regulations, the paper examines how the health act could be defined, with the possibilities offered by telecommunications, and how it now relates legally to the physical place where it takes place.
Results
Even if telemedicine opens the way to virtual spaces of health practice, the Ministry of Health Italian Guidelines pose functional and logistical issues to guarantee users’ safety and health care system accountability. Then, functional requirements for health legitimate practice, and their continuous monitoring, together with the responsibilities of the service centers, health professionals and health facilities, are discussed.
Conclusion
The questioning of States’ health law, in a broad health system such as that of the Europe, characterized by autonomous health regulations, is extremely important for cross-border health policy with telemedicine, as overall regulatory compliance in health care is the ground criterion for risk prevention and patient safety, to be properly verified.
Corte di Cassazione Penale sezione III. Sentenza n. 38485 del 20.06.2019 - Ruling n. 38485, 20 June 2019. 2019.
2.
AntonacciGBeneventoEBonavitacolaS, et al.Healthcare professional and manager perceptions on drivers, benefits, and challenges of telemedicine: Results from a cross-sectional survey in the Italian NHS. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:1–19.
3.
CecchiAPasturenziC. Servizi al paziente: quando si tratta di telemedicina e quali sono le relative implicazioni (focus sulla necessità della preventiva autorizzazione regionale) - Patient services: when is telemedicine and what are its implications. Rass di Dirit Farm e della Salut. 2021;2:255–60.
4.
Corte di Cassazione Penale sezione III. Sentenza 25 maggio 2007, n. 2047 - Ruling 25 May 2007, n. 20474. 2007.
Regione Emilia-Romagna Direzione generale cura della persona salute e welfare - Emilia-Romagna Region Health and Welfare General Directorate. Circolare 2/2021 - Assistenza Specialistica Ambulatoriale: precisazioni relative alla DGR 1227/2021 “Indicazioni in merito all’erogazione di servizi di telemedicina nelle strutture del servizio sanitario regionale”. 2021.
7.
NataleG. Responsabilità medica e sanità digitale - Medical liabilty and digital health. Rass della Avvocatura di Stato. 2022;74:229–45.
8.
GuardaP.Telemedicine and Application Scenarios: Common Privacy and Security Requirements in the European Union Context.2015.
9.
SalibaVLegido-QuigleyHHallikR, et al.Telemedicine across borders: A systematic review of factors that hinder or support implementation. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2012;81:793–809.
10.
FerréFGiulioAValerioL, et al.Health system review: Italy. Health Syst Transit. 2022;24:1–168.
Ministero della Salute - Health Ministry. Decreto 21 settembre 2022 Approvazione delle linee guida per i servizi di telemedicina - Requisiti funzionali e livelli di servizio - Decree 21 September 2022 Approval of guidelines for telemedicine services - Functional requirements and service levels. 2022.
13.
Ministero della salute. Telemedicina Linee di indirizzo nazionali - Telemedicine National indications. 2014.
14.
KruseCSSteinAThomasH, et al.The use of electronic health records to support population health: A systematic review of the literature. J Med Syst. 2018;42:214.
15.
Ministero della Salute - Health Ministry. Decreto 19 dicembre 2022 Valutazione in termini di qualità, sicurezza ed appropriatezza delle attività erogate per l’accreditamento e per gli accordi contrattuali con le strutture sanitarie - Decree 19 December 2022. 2022.
16.
CartabiaM. La giurisprudenza costituzionale relativa all’art. 32, secondo comma, della Costituzione italiana. Quad Cost. 2012;32:455–68.
17.
RadognaABolcatoVCarelliC, et al.Italian National Health Service immunized by COVID-19?Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene. 2022;63:E4–E5.
18.
VincetiSR. Reorganizing Italy’s territorial healthcare: The Ministerial Decree No. 77/2022 and its comparative significance. Ann di Ig Med Prev e di Comunita. 2022;35:367–71.
19.
MauroMGiancottiM. The 2022 primary care reform in Italy: Improving continuity and reducing regional disparities? Health Policy (New York). 135. Epub ahead of print 1 September 2023. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104862.
20.
RaposoVL. Telemedicine: The legal framework (or the lack of it) in Europe. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2016;12:Doc03.
21.
ParimbelliEBottalicoBLosioukE, et al.Trusting telemedicine: A discussion on risks, safety, legal implications and liability of involved stakeholders. Int J Med Inform. 2018;112:90–8.
22.
CandidoGCasciniFLachmanP, et al.Effects of the Italian law on patient safety and health professional responsibilities five years after its approval by the Italian Parliament. Healthcare. 2023;11:1858.
23.
SoliminiRBusardòFPGibelliF, et al.Ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Medicina (B Aires). 2021;57:1314.
24.
BolcatoVFranzettiCFassinaG, et al.Comparative study on informed consent regulation in health care among Italy, France, United Kingdom, Nordic Countries, Germany, and Spain. J Forensic Leg Med. 2024;103:102674.
25.
HoaglinMCBrennerLHTeoW, et al.Medicolegal sidebar: Telemedicine-new opportunities and new risks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479:1671–3.
26.
European Commission. Commission implementing decision 2019/1765 of 22 October 2019 providing the rules for the establishment, the management and the functioning of the network of national authorities responsible for eHealth, and repealing Implementing Decision 2011/890/EU. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32019D1765 (2019, accessed 17 December 2023).
27.
European Commission. Market study on telemedicine. Available from: https://europa.eu. 2018.
28.
European Commission. Communication on Enabling the Digital Transformation of Health and Care. 2018.
BlandiLOdoneA. The synergies of University Education and Primary Health Care to meet populations health needs. Annali di Igiene Medicina Preventiva e di Comunita. 2023;35:121–4.
32.
BlandiLSabbatucciMDallagiacomaG, et al.Digital information approach through social media among Gen Z and millennials: The global scenario during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines. 2022;10:1822.
33.
ToraldoDMVergariUToraldoM. Medical malpractice, defensive medicine and role of the “media” in Italy. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2015;10:12.
CuriosoWHCoronel-ChucosLGHenríquez-SuarezM. Integrating telehealth for strengthening health systems in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: A perspective from Peru. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20:5980.
36.
FieldsBG. Regulatory, legal, and ethical considerations of telemedicine. Sleep Medicine Clinics. 2020;15:409–16.
37.
FurlepaKTenderendaAKozłowskiR, et al.Recommendations for the development of telemedicine in poland based on the analysis of barriers and selected telemedicine solutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:1221.
38.
MuyundaLMpunduM. Mapping the regulatory framework for telemedicine in Zambia: A content analysis. Int J Membr Sci Technol. 2023;10:3445–61.
39.
Lupiáñez-VillanuevaFGundersonLVitielloS, et al.Study on Health Data, Digital Health, and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Publications Office of the European Union;2022. Epub ahead of print 2022. doi:10.2875/702007.
40.
Chike-HarrisKEDurhamCLoganA, et al.Integration of telehealth education into the health care provider curriculum: A review. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2021;27:137–49.
41.
KaplanB. Revisiting health information technology ethical, legal, and social issues and evaluation: Telehealth/telemedicine and COVID-19. Int J Med Inform. 2020;143:104239.
42.
NittariGKhumanRBaldoniS, et al.Telemedicine practice: Review of the current ethical and legal challenges. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2020;26:1427–37.
43.
FerorelliDNardelliLSpagnoloL, et al.Medical legal aspects of telemedicine in italy: Application fields, professional liability and focus on care services during the COVID-19 health emergency. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:215013272098505.
44.
De MiccoFFineschiVBanfiG, et al.From COVID-19 pandemic to patient safety: A new ‘spring’ for telemedicine or a boomerang effect?Front Med. 2022;9:901788.
45.
ParrettiCLa ReginaMTortuC, et al.Telemedicine in Italy, the starting point. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2023;18:949–51.
46.
MarinelliSBasileGZaamiS, et al.Telemedicine, telepsychiatry and COVID-19 pandemic: Future prospects for global health. Healthcare. 2022;10:2085.
47.
BasileGAccettaRMarinelliS, et al.Traumatology: Adoption of the Sm@rtEven application for the remote evaluation of patients and possible medico-legal implications. J Clin Med. 2022;11:3644.
48.
LanzolaGCapozziDSerinaN, et al.Bringing the artificial pancreas home: Telemedicine aspects. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:1381–6.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
