Erratum to ‘Human rights referendum: Dissonance between “the will of the people” and fundamental rights?’

Ignatius Yordan Nugraha, ‘Human rights referendum: Dissonance between “the will of the people” and fundamental rights?’ (2020) 38 NQHR 115. DOI: 10.1177/0924051920923614

In the above referenced article, there was an error in the formatting of Table 1. The correct Table 1 is given below:

Table 1.

Referendums under International Human Rights Law.

Type of Referendum	Incompatible with jus cogens	Limiting Human Rights	Repealing Limitation/Emancipating a Group
Compulsory referendum	Obligation to prevent such a referendum (including by introducing an ex ante peremptory norms review)	Obligation to prevent such a referendum, although it could still be held if the grounds of limitation are fulfilled	Allowed as part of the State’s constitutional processes, but rejection by voters cannot be invoked to justify violation
Facultative referendum			Not prohibited in principle, other recourse preferred and the result cannot be invoked to justify violation

SAGE Publishing regrets that the formatting of Table 1 was set incorrectly during the production process.