Abstract
In this article the author lays out and discusses three different models for arriving at universal agreement in ethics. The author argues that the 'human rights model'-the model by which international human rights instruments get produced-has some serious flaws. The second model is the 'necessary conditions model'. It enables us to arrive at a significant but still too thin universal ethic. The author presents a case for the 'cultural dialogue model' in which members of one culture undertake a piecemeal search in the texts and way of life of other cultures, for beliefs, practices, etc. resembling their own. In this model cross-cultural disagreement is acknowledged, but the appropriate kind of room is left open to work towards thicker cross-cultural agreement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
