Due to their mediating position between two antagonistic entities, brokers are often attributed a suspicious moral ambiguity, but also autonomy and creativity. Building on ethnographic fieldwork in two Slovak refugee support organisations, I examine these assumptions in relation to ʻintegration brokers’. Actors in Slovak refugee care services struggle with accusations of being partisan either to the refugees’ or state authorities’ side. By showing how refugee supporters switch between seemingly opposing moral paradigms, I problematise a popular understanding of the broker as a potent and autonomous agent and focus instead on the process of layering constraints that characterises the in-between.
AlpesMJ (2017a) Papers that work. Migration brokers, state/market boundaries, and the place of law. PoLAR40(2): 262–277.
2.
AlpesMJ (2017b) Why aspiring migrants trust migration brokers: The moral economy of departure in Anglophone Cameroon. Africa87(2): 1–18.
3.
AnderssonR (2014) Illegality Inc. Clandestine Migration and the Business of Bordering Europe. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
4.
AsadT (2004) Where are the margins of the state? In: DasVPooleD (eds.) Anthropology in the Margins of the State. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press (School of American Research advanced seminar series), pp.279–288.
5.
BegerP (2018) Par ordre du mufti? Kontestation der Visegrád-Gruppe gegen den europäischen Umverteilungs- und Neuansiedlungsmechanismus für Flüchtlinge. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft12(1): 247–262.
6.
BoissevainJ (1974) Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators and Coalitions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
7.
BorárosováIFilipecO (2017) Europeanization of Slovak migration policy and its consequences: from modernization to fortifcation?The Polish Migration Review2(2): 55–71.
8.
BurtRS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
ChudžikovaA (2016) Obraz utečencov v médiách na Slovensku. In: HlinčíkováMMesežnikovG (eds.) Otvorená krajina alebo nedobytná pevnosť? Slovensko, migranti a utečenci. Bratislava: Inštitút pre verejné otázky/Heinrich Böll Stiftung, pp.95–111.
10.
De JongS (2018) Brokerage and transnationalism. Present and past intermediaries, social mobility, and mixed loyalties. Identities25(5): 610–628.
11.
DevinskýB (2007) Slovakia. In: TriantaphylliduAGropasR (eds.) European Immigration. A Sourcebook. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 313–326.
FaistT (2014) Brokerage in cross-border mobility: social mechanisms and the (re)production of social inequalities. Social Inclusion2(4): 38–52.
14.
FiladelviováAGyárfášováOSekulováM, et al. (2011) Migranti na slovenskom trhu práce: Problémy a perspektivy. Bratislava: Inštitút pre verejné otázky.
15.
GaždovičováT (ed.) (2011) Vzdelávanie detí cudzincov na Slovensku. Potreby a riešenia. Bratislava: Centrum pre výzkum etnicity a kultury, Nadácia Milana Šimečku.
16.
GoldSJ (2005) Migrant networks: A summary and critique of relational approaches to international migration. In: RomeroRMargolisE (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Inequalities. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 257–285.
17.
GriffithsM (2012) ‘Vile liars and truth distorters’: Truth, trust and the asylum system. Anthropology Today28(5): 8–12.
18.
HlinčíkováMSekulováM (2015) Integrácia ľudí s medzinárodnou ochranou na Slovensku. Hľadanie východísk. Bratislava: Inštítut pre verejné otázky.
19.
JamesD (2011) The return of the broker: Consensus, hierarchy, and choice in South African land reform. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute17(2): 318–338.
20.
KosterMVan LeynseeleY (2018) Brokers as assemblers. Studying development through the lens of brokerage. Ethnos83(5): 803–813.
21.
KusáZBúzikBKlobuckýR, et al. (2017) Naše európske hodnoty 2017. Hodnoty v dynamike spoločenských zmien na Slovensku a v Európe. Komentár k zisteniam slovenskej časti výskumu európskych hodnôt EVS 2017. Bratislava: Sociologický Ùstav SAV.
22.
LaidlawJ (2014) The Subject of Virtue. An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
LambekM (ed.) (2010) Ordinary Ethics. Anthropology, Language, and Action. 1st ed. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
24.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction of Actor-Network-Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
LindquistJA (2015) Anthropology of brokers and brokerage. In:International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences2: 870–974.
26.
LindquistJAXiangBYeohBSA (2012) Introduction: Opening the black box of migration: brokers, the organisation of transnational mobility and the changing political economy in Asia. Pacific Affairs85(1): 7–19.
27.
McKeownA (2012) How the box became black. Brokers and the creation of the free migrant. Pacific Affairs85(1): 21–45.
28.
MasseyDS (1998) Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29.
MattinglyC (2014) Moral Laboratories. Family Peril and the Struggle for a Good Life. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
MurphyWP (1981) The rhetorical management of dangerous knowledge in Kpelle brokerage. American Ethnologist8(4): 667–685.
32.
PeeplesMARandall HaasW (2013) Brokerage and social capital in the prehispanic U.S. Southwest. American Anthropologist115(2): 232–247.
33.
RogalskaK (2016) Misslungener Poker mit der Flüchtlingskrise. Osteuropa66(3): 43–50.
34.
SimmelG (1950) The triad. In: WolffKH (ed.) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, NY: Free Press, pp.145–169.
35.
SørensenNNGammeltoft-HansenT (2013) Introduction. In: SørensenNNGammeltoft-HansenT (eds.) The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration. London: Routledge, pp.1–23.
36.
SzczepanikovaA (2013) Czech Republic and Slovakia, migration 19th century to present. In: NessI (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.1–4.
37.
TicktinM (2012) Casualties of Care. Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38.
TuckettA (2018) Ethical brokerage and self-fashioning in Italian immigration bureaucracy. Critique of Anthropology38(3): 245–264.
39.
WolfER (1956) Aspects of group relations in a complex society. Mexico. American Anthropologist58(6): 1065–1078.
40.
ZigonJ (2011) Multiple Moralities and Religions in Post-Soviet Russia. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
41.
ŽúborováVBorárosováI (2017) Migration discourse in Slovak politics. Context and content of migration in political discourse: European values versus campaign rhetoric. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics11(1): 1–19.
