Participatory strategies have generated a critical body of work examining the meaning of empowerment and urban policy-making in societies undergoing a shift from government to governance. Discussions on the institutionalized limits of participatory policies and genealogies of participatory discourses have often shed inadequate light on the perspective of the economically marginalized. My study draws from ethnographic fieldwork in an urban slum in India and engages with the personal and collective assessments of a group of 18 women volunteering for health improvement in their communities. I look at select instances of self-governance and demonstrate how volunteers seek to transform their social statuses and convince themselves to continue to take responsibility for their community’s health improvement. At the same time, community volunteers are not automatons. Against existing material and social challenges, they develop an ambivalent relationship with their volunteering roles and demand a ‘salary’ equivalent to their ‘work’.
Abu-LughodJHayR (eds) (1977) Third World Urbanization. Chicago: Maaroufa Press.
2.
AtkinsonR (2003) Addressing urban social exclusion through community involvement in urban regeneration. In: ImrieRRacoM (eds) Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
3.
BanerjeaN (2011) Voluntary participation and poor women’s work: a critical examination of a community health improvement initiative in a Kolkata slum. Contemporary South Asia19(4): 427–440.
4.
BanerjeeN (1985) Women Workers in the Unorganized Sector: The Calcutta Experience. Hyderabad: Sangam Books.
5.
BanerjeeN (1992) Poverty, Work and Gender in Urban India. Occasional Paper, 133. Calcutta: Centre for Studies in Social Sciences.
6.
BatliwalaS (2007) Taking the power out of empowerment: an experiential account. Development in Practice17(4/5): 557–65.
7.
BondiL (2005) Working the spaces of neoliberal subjectivity: psychotherapeutic technologies, professionalisation and counseling. Antipode37(3): 497–514.
8.
CastellsM (1979) The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Census of India (2001) Series 20: West Bengal. Provisional Population Totals. West Bengal: Directorate of Census Operations.
10.
ChakrabartiAHaldarA (1990) Slum Dwellers of Calcutta: Socio-Economic Profile, 1989–90. Calcutta: Metropolitan Development Authority.
11.
ChouliarakiLFaircloughN (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
12.
CleaverF (2001) Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. In: CookeBKothariU (eds) Participation: The New Tyranny. London and New York: Zed Books.
13.
Communities Taking Charge of Their Health (2002a) Local initiatives program.
14.
Communities Taking Charge of Their Health (2002b) The India Local Initiatives Program. Kolkata: Management Sciences for Health.
15.
CookeB (2001) The Social Psychological Limits of Participation? In: CookeBKothariU (eds) Participation: The New Tyranny. London and New York: Zed Books.
16.
CookeBKothariU (2001) The case for participation as tyranny. in CookeBKothariU (eds) Participation: The New Tyranny. London and New York: Zed Books.
17.
CornwallA (2002) Making Spaces, Changing Places: Situating Participation in Development. IDS Working Paper, 170. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
18.
CornwallA (2003) Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World Development31(8): 1325–42.
19.
CornwallA (2004) Spaces for transformation? Reflections on issues of power and difference in participation in development. In: HickeySMohanG (eds) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation. London: Zed Books.
20.
CornwallA (2007) Myths to live by? Female solidarity and female autonomy reconsidered. Development and Change38(1): 149–68.
21.
DaCostaD (2007) Tensions of neo-liberal development: state discourse and dramatic oppositions in West Bengal. Contributions to Indian Sociology41(3): 287–320.
22.
DalyM (2003) Governance and social policy. Journal of Social Policy32(1): 113–28.
23.
de CerteauM (1988) The Practice of Everyday Life. Tr. Rendall S. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
FaircloughN (1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: the universities. Discourse and Society4(2): 133–68.
25.
FaircloughN (2000) New Labour, New Language?London: Routledge.
26.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
27.
FyfeN (2005) Making space for ‘neo-communitarianism’’? The third sector, state and civil society in the UK. Antipode37(3): 536–57.
28.
GaventaJCornwallA (2001) Power and knowledge. In: ReasonPBradburyH (eds) Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: SAGE.
29.
GilbertNNMulkayM (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
GuptaA (1997) Beyond ‘culture’: space, identity, and the politics of difference. In: GuptaAFergusonJ (eds) Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
GuptaAFergusonJ (1997a) Culture, power and place: ethnography at the end of an era. In: GuptaAFergusonJ (eds) Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
GuptaAFergusonJ (1997b) Discipline and practice: the field as site, method and location in anthropology. In: GuptaAFergusonJ (eds) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
HenkelHStirratR (2001) Participation as spiritual duty; empowerment as secular subjection. In: CookeBKothariU (eds) Participation: The New Tyranny. London: Zed Books.
34.
HickeySMohanG (2004) Towards participation as transformation: critical themes and challenges. In: HickeySMohanG (eds) Particpation; From Tyranny to Transformation. London: Zed Books.
35.
JenkinsK (2008) Practically professionals? Grassroots women as local experts. A Peruvian case study. Political Geography27: 139–59.
36.
JenkinsK (2009) ‘We have a lot of goodwill, but we still need to eat…’: valuing women’s long term voluntarism in community development in Lima. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations20:15–34.
37.
JonesE (2001) SPEECH Of Other Spaces: Situating Participatory Practices. A Case Study from South India. IDS Working Paper, 137. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
38.
JonesPS (2003) Urban regeneration’s poisoned chalice: is there an impasse in (community) participation-based policy?Urban Studies40(3): 581–601.
39.
KamatS (2002) Development Hegemony: NGOs and the State in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
40.
KarimL (2008) Demystifying micro-credit: the Grameen Bank, NGOs, and neoliberalism in Bangladesh. Cultural Dynamics20(5): 5–29.
41.
KothariU (2001) Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development. In: CookeBKothariU (eds) Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books.
42.
KothariU (2005) Authority and expertise: the professionalisation of international development and the ordering of dissent. Antipode37(3): 426–46.
LarnerWWaltersW (2004) Globalisation as governmentality. Alternatives29: 495–514.
45.
LaurieNAndolinaRRadcliffeS (2003) Indigenous professionalization: transnational social reproduction in the Andes. Antipode35(3): 463–91.
46.
LealPA (2007) Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. Development in Practice17(4/5): 539–48.
47.
LindA (1997) Gender, development and urban social change: women’s community action in global cities. World Development25(8): 1205–23.
48.
MercerC (2002) The discourse of Maendeleo and the politics of women’s participation on Mount Kilimanjaro. Development and Change33: 101–27.
49.
NagarRRajuS (2003) Women, NGOs and the contradictions of empowerment and disempowerment: a conversation. Antipode35(1): 1–13.
50.
NarayanK (1993) How native is the ‘native’ anthropologist?American Anthropologist, NS 95(3): 671–86.
51.
NewmanJ (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: SAGE.
52.
NewmanJBarnesMSullivanHKnopsA (2004) Public Participation And Collaborative Governance. Journal of Social Policy33(2): 203–23.
53.
NeysmithSReitsma-StreetM (2000) Valuing unpaid work in the third sector: the case of community resource centres. Canadian Public Policy26(3): 331–46.
54.
O’HareP (2010) Capacity building for community-led regeneration: facilitating or frustrating public engagement?’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(1/2): 32–47.
55.
PaxmanJMSayeedABuxbaumAHuberSCStoverC (2005) The India Local Initiatives Program: a model for expanding reproductive and child health services. Studies in Family Planning36(3): 203–20.
56.
PortesAWaltonJ (1976) Urban Latin America: The Political Condition from Above and Below. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
57.
RobertsB (1978) Cities of Peasants: The Political Economy of Urbanization in the Third World. London: E. Arnold.
58.
RoseN (1996) The death of the social? Reconfiguring the territory of government. Economy and Society25(3): 327–56.
59.
SalzingerL (2002) Genders in Production: Making Workers in Mexico’s Global Factories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
60.
SwyngedouwE (2005) Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus-face of governance-beyond-the state. Urban Studies42(11): 1991–2006.
61.
TaylorM (2000) Communities in the lead: power, organizational capacity and social capital. Urban Studies37(5/6): 1019–35.
62.
TaylorM (2007) Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Studies44(2): 297–317.
63.
UpvallMJSochaelSGonsalvesA (2002) Behind the mud walls: the role and practice of lady health visitors of Pakistan. Health Care for Women International23: 432–41.
64.
van DijkTA (2001) Critical discourse analysis. In: TannenDSchiffrinDHamiltonH (eds) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
65.
WetherellMPotterJ (1988) Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretive repertoires. In: AntakiC (ed.) Analysing Everyday Experience: A Casebook of Methods. London: SAGE.
66.
WHO and GHWA (2008) Scaling Up, Saving Lives. Geneva: WHO.
67.
WHO, PEPFAR and UNAIDS (2007) Task Shifting: Rational Redistribution of Tasks among Health Workforce Teams. Global Recommendations and Guidelines. Geneva: WHO.
68.
WodakR (2001) What CDA is about: a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
69.
YeohBSATeoPHuangS (2002) Introduction: women’s agencies and activisms in the Asia-Pacific region. In: YeohBSATeoPHuangS (eds) Gender Politics in the Asia-Pacific Region. London and New York: Routledge.
