This article is an argument for the integration of the sociological tools of institutional theory with the critical legal studies tradition as a way of reinvigorating critical studies of science and technology. For Marxist, feminist, postcolonial, anti-racist, and anti-homophobic progressive traditions, critical legal studies as scholarship and practice provide important models for science studies. These models make sense of and make use of an institution while challenging its legitimacy. Neo-institutionalist theory allows greater analytic purchase on the mechanisms and strategy which shape organizations and fields and their responses to changes in their internal and external environments, and in particular, engagement with the problems of legitimacy which challenge law, science, and science studies.
Ahmed, Sara (1998) Differences that Matter: Feminist Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Ashmore, Malcolm, Derek Edwards and Jonathan Potter (1994) ‘The Bottom Line: The Rhetoric of Reality Demonstrations’, Configurations2(1): 1–14.
3.
Baron, Jane B. and Julia Epstein (1998) ‘Language and the Law: Literature, Narrative, and Legal Theory’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 662–679. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Bauman, Richard W. (1996) Critical Legal Studies: A Guide to the Literature. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
Burns, W. Haywood (1998) ‘Law and Race in Early America’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 279–284. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Croissant, Jennifer (1998) ‘Criteria for a Theory of Knowledge’, in A. Sica (ed.) What is Social Theory: The Philosophical Debates, pp. 145–176. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
Croissant, Jennifer and Sal Restivo (1995) ‘Science, Social Problems, and Progressive Thought: Essays on the Tyranny of Science’, in S.L. Star (ed.) Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology, pp. 39–87. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
8.
Daston, Lorraine (1992) ‘Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective’, Social Studies of Science22: 597–618.
9.
Dear, Peter (1992) ‘From Truth to Disinterestedness in the Seventeenth Century’, Social Studies of Science22: 619–631.
10.
Deason, Ellen E. (1999) ‘Incompatible Versions of Authority in Law and Science’, Social Epistemology13(2): 147–164.
11.
DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell (1991) ‘Introduction’ and ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 1–38. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Freeman, Alan (1998) ‘Antidiscrimination Law from 1954 to 1989: Uncertainty, Contradiction, Rationalization, Denial’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 285–311. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Gieryn, Thomas (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Gordon, Robert W. (1998) ‘Some Critical Theories of Law and their Critics’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 621–661. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Guillaumin, Collette (1997) ‘Race and Nature: The System of Marks’, in E. Nathanial Gates (ed.) Cultural and Literary Critiques of the Concepts of ‘Race’, pp. 117–135. New York: Garland Publishing.
16.
Hacking, Ian (1999) The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Halley, Janet E. (1998) ‘Gay Rights and Identity Imitation: Issues in the Ethics of Representation’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 115–146. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Haraway, Donna Jeanne (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association.
19.
Haraway, Donna Jeanne (1997) Modest-Witness@Second-Millennium. FemaleMan-Meets-OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York and London: Routledge.
20.
Harding, Sandra G. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
Harding, Sandra G. (1993) The ‘Racial’ Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
22.
Harding, Sandra G. (1998) Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23.
John, Mary E. (1989) ‘Postcolonial Feminists in the Western Intellectual Field: Anthropologists andNative Informants’, Inscriptions5: 49–73.
24.
Junker, Kirk W. (1999) ‘Preview: Special Issue on Law and Science’, Social Epistemology13(2): 95–98.
25.
Kairys, David (ed.) (1998) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn.New York: Basic Books.
26.
Kramer, Matthew H. (1995) Critical Legal Theory and the Challenge of Feminism: A Philosophical Reconsideration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
Lawrence, Charles R., III (1998) ‘Race and Affirmative Action: A Critical Race Perspective’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 312–327. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Long, Clarissa (1999) ‘The Dissonance of Scientific and Legal Norms’, Social Epistemology13(2): 165–181.
29.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1992) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
30.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Mensch, Elizabeth (1998) ‘The History of Mainstream Legal Thought’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique,3rd edn, pp. 23–53. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Michael, John (1996) ‘Science Friction and Cultural Studies: Intellectuals, Interdisciplinarity, and the Profession of Truth’, Camera Obscura37: 124–154.
33.
Moore, Kelly (1996) ‘Organizing Integrity: American Science and the Creation of Public Interest Organizations, 1955–1975’, American Journal of Sociology101(6): 1592–1627.
34.
Outlaw, Lucius (1997) ‘Toward a Critical Theory of “Race” ’, in E. Nathanial Gates (ed.) Cultural and Literary Critiques of the Concepts of ‘Race’,pp. 384–404. New York: Garland Publishing.
35.
Porter, Theodore (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Rabinowitz, Victor (1998) ‘The Radical Tradition in the Law’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 680–690. New York: Basic Books.
37.
Sarat, Austin (1998) ‘Going to Court: Access, Autonomy, and the Contradictions of Liberal Legality’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 97–114. New York: Basic Books.
38.
Schafer, Burkhard (1999) ‘Form Follows Function Fails as a Sociological Foundation of Comparative Law’, Social Epistemology13(2): 113–128.
39.
Shapin, Steven (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein (1997) Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Sokal, Alan (1996) ‘A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies’, Lingua Franca (May 7–June): 62–64.
42.
Stein, Edward (1999) The Mismeasure of Desire: The Science, Theory, and Ethics of Sexual Orientation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
West, Cornell (1998) ‘The Role of Law in Progressive Politics’, in D. Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn, pp. 708–717. New York: Basic Books.
44.
Wright, Will (1992) Wild Knowledge: Science, Language, and Social Life in a Fragile Environment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
