AgbonteanVGreeneyTLarkinsC, et al. (2024) Deepening collaborative research with children and young people: a co-edited and co-written special issue. Special Issue in Childhood31(3): 267–277.
2.
AishaAGulliMAbdullayevaM, et al. (2024) Reflecting on participation’s promises: insights from collaborative research about unaccompanied child migrants, care, and the UK’s hostile immigration regime. Childhood31(3): 278–292.
3.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.
4.
ChilisaB (2012) Indigenous Research Methodologies. Sage.
5.
DaelmanSDe SchauwerEVan HoveG (2020) Becoming-with research participants: possibilities in qualitative research with children. Childhood27(4): 483–497.
6.
DenzinNK (2001) The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research1(1): 23–46.
7.
GergenKJ (2014) From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour45(3): 287–310.
8.
HekmanS (2010) The Material of Knowledge: Feminist Disclosures. Indiana University Press.
9.
HeldMBE (2019) Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism: an unsettling, mutual, and collaborative effort. International Journal of Qualitative Methods18: 1609406918821574.
10.
hooksb. (1992) Eating the other: desire and resistance. In: Black Looks: Race and Representation. South End Press.
11.
HultmanKLenz TaguchiH (2010) Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: a relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education23(5): 525–542.
12.
IngoldT (2014) That’s enough about ethnography. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory4(1): 383–395.
13.
IngoldT (2018) Anthropology: Why it Matters. Polity Press.
14.
KuntzAM (2015) The Responsible Methodologist: Inquiry, truth-telling, and Social Justice. Left Coast Press.
15.
LawJ (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge.
16.
LawJUrryJ (2004) Enacting the social. Economy and Society33(3): 390–410.
17.
MarnTMWolgemuthJR (2017) Purposeful entanglements: a new materialist analysis of transformative interviews. Qualitative Inquiry23(5): 365–374.
18.
McNameeSGergenKJ (1999) Relational Responsibility: Resources for Sustainable Dialogue. Sage.
19.
MertensDM (2009) Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press.
20.
MolA (1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: LawJHassardJ (eds). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell, 74–89.
21.
PickeringA (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press.
22.
RommNRA (2018) Responsible Research Practice: Revisiting Transformative Paradigm Social Research. Springer.
23.
RommN (2020) Reflections on a post-qualitative inquiry with children/young people: exploring and furthering a performative research ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum for Qualitative Social Research21(1): 6.
24.
RothW-M (2006) Collective responsiblity and solidarity: toward a body-centered ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum for Qualitative Social Research7(2): 37. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602374
25.
SilverLJ (2019) Transformative childhood studies – a remix in inquiry, justice, and love. Children’s Geographies18(2): 176–190.
26.
SimpsonA (2007) On ethnographic refusal: indigeneity, ‘voice,’ and colonial citizenship. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue9: 67–80.
27.
SpyrouS (2018) Disclosing Childhoods: Research and Knowledge Production for a Critical Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
SpyrouS (2024) From extractivist practices and the child-as-data to an ethics of reciprocity and mutuality in empirical childhood research. Childhood31(1): 3–12.
29.
SpyrouSTheodorouEChristouG (2022) Crafting futures with hope: young climate activists’ imaginaries in an age of crisis and uncertainty. Children & Society36(5): 731–746.
30.
St PierreEA (2021) Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry27(1): 3–9.
31.
StithIRothW-M (2006) Who gets to ask the questions: the ethics in/of cogenerative dialogue praxis. FQS7(2): 38.