This paper is a diffractive analysis of post-qualitative research focused on children’s learning that was carried out in Chile during 2020 and 2021. Twenty-five visual production interviews were conducted with children between 7 and 11 years of age from a variety of geographical and socio-cultural contexts. The data are crystallized and diffracted in the light of various authors who represent post-structuralist, post-Freudian, and post-materialist perspectives. Magic is defined as a tool for resistance and negotiating power dynamics (Foucault), as a bridge between conscious and unconscious (Jung and Winnicott), and as bringing forth potential virtual states (Barad and Deleuze).
Armijo CabreraM (2021) Investigar las experiencias infantiles con post-etnografía escolar visual: dilemas epistemológicos. Revista Latinoamericana De Metodología De Las Ciencias Sociales (Relmecs)11(1): e085. DOI: 10.24215/18537863e085.
2.
BallS (2012) Foucault, Power and Education. London, UK: Routledge.
3.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BozalekVZembylasM (2016) Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education30(2): 111–127. DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166.
5.
BurmanE (2023) Child as method: a device to read the geopolitics of childhood. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales Avance en línea20(2): 1–14. DOI: 10.5209/tekn.84628.
6.
BuserM (2014) Thinking through non-representational and affective atmospheres in planning theory and practice. Planning Theory13(3): 227–243. DOI: 10.1177/1473095213491744.
7.
CorsaroW (2020) Big ideas from little people: what research with children contributes to social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly83(1): 5–25. DOI: 10.1177/0190272520906412.
8.
DaviesB (2014) Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: a diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry20(6): 734–741. DOI: 10.1177/1077800414530256.
9.
DeleuzeG (1968) Différence et répétition. Paris, France: PUF.
10.
DusselITrujilloB (2018) ¿Nuevas formas de enseñar y aprender? Las posibilidades en conflicto de las tecnologías digitales en la escuela [New ways of teaching and learning? The conflicting possibilities of digital technologies in schools]. Perfiles Educativos40: 142–178. DOI: 10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2018.Especial.59182.
11.
EliadeM (1957/2020) Lo Sagrado Y Lo Profano [The Sacred and the Profane]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
GarcíaS (2018) Videojuegos y violencia: una revisión de la línea de investigación de los efectos [Video games and violence: a review of the research line on the effects]. Revista de la Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación13(1): 149–165. DOI: 10.35305/rece.v1i13.329.
14.
GuberR (2011) La Etnografía. Método, Campo Y Reflexividad [Ethnography. Method, Field and Reflexivity]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
15.
HarawayD (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
HultmanKLenz TaguchiH (2010) Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: a relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education23(5): 525–542. DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2010.500628.
17.
JungCG (1967) The Development of Personality. London, UK: Routledge.
18.
JungCG (1973) Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
JungCG (2015) Arquetipos e inconsciente colectivo. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
20.
Lenz TaguchiHPalmerA (2013) A more ‘livable’ school? A diffractive analysis of the performative enactments of girls’ ill-/well-being with(in) school environments. Gender and Education25(6): 671–687. DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2013.829909.
21.
MazzeiL (2014) Beyond an easy sense: a diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry20(6): 742–746. DOI: 10.1177/1077800414530257.
22.
MellanderEWiszmegA (2016) Interfering with others - re-configuring ethnography as a diffractive practice. Kulturstudier7(1): 93–115. DOI: 10.7146/ks.v7i1.24056.
23.
PinkS (2013) Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
PopkewitzT (2012) The sociology of education as the history of the present: fabrication, difference and abjection. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education34(3): 439–456. DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2012.717195.
25.
PrettiEJiangJNielsenA, et al. (2022) Memories of a girl between worlds: speculative common worldings. Journal of Childhood Studies47(1): 14–28. DOI: 10.18357/jcs202219957.
26.
RautioP (2013) Children who carry stones in their pockets: on autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies11(4): 394–408. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2013.812278.
27.
RichardsonL (2000) New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociology of Sport Journal17: 5–20. DOI: 10.1123/ssj.17.1.5.
28.
SøndergaardD (2013) Virtual materiality, potentiality and subjectivity: how do we conceptualize real-virtual interaction embodied and enacted in computer gaming, imagination and night dreams?Subjectivity6(1): 55–78. DOI: 10.1057/sub.2012.23.
29.
SpyrouS (2011) The limits of children’s voices: from authenticity to critical, reflexive representation. Childhood18(2): 151–165. DOI: 10.1177/0907568210387834.
30.
St PierreEA (2017) Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry24(9): 603–608. DOI: 10.1177/1077800417734567.
31.
St PierreEAJacksonA (2014) Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry20(6): 715–719. DOI: 10.1177/1077800414532435.
32.
TaguchiHL (2012) A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory13(3): 265–281. DOI: 10.1177/1464700112456001.
33.
WinnicottD (1971/1975) Jeu et Réalité: l’espace potentiel [Game and Reality: The Potential Space]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
