This article draws attention to the ethical nuances of conducting participatory research with children and young people growing up in a popular tourist destination in Australia. It responds to calls for more reflexively oriented approaches to documenting the ethical dimensions of qualitative research, particularly with children. Prolonged engagement in the field facilitated a deeper understanding of young people’s lived experiences and the challenges they face in negotiating identity, belonging and connection with community. Findings reveal there are a number of important benefits when actively involving young people in research. With the democratisation of the research process, however, comes an increased ethical responsibility which requires a reflexive and relational approach if meaningful and inclusive participation is to be achieved.
AldersonP (2012) Rights-respecting research: A commentary on ‘the right to be properly researched: Research with children in a messy, real world’. Children’s Geographies10(2): 233–239.
2.
AnsellNRobsonEHajduFet al. (2012) Learning from young people about their lives: Using participatory methods to research the impacts of AIDS in Southern Africa. Children’s Geographies10(2): 169–186.
3.
AteljevicIHarrisCWilsonEet al. (2005) Getting ‘entangled’: Reflexivity and the ‘critical turn’ in tourism studies. Tourism Recreation Research30(2): 9–21.
4.
BeazleyHBessellSEnnewJet al. (2009) The right to be properly researched: Research with children in a messy, real world. Children’s Geographies7(4): 365–378.
5.
BlackRWalshLTaylorF (2011) Young people on the margins: What works in youth participation. Youth Studies Australia30(1): 42–48.
6.
BrosnanTFilepSRockJ (2015) Exploring synergies: Hopeful tourism and citizen science. Annals of Tourism Research 53(C): 96–98.
7.
CammarotaJFineM (2008) Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In: CammarotaJFineM (eds) Revolutionizing Education Youth Participatory Action Research in Motion. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–11.
8.
CanosaA (2014) The role of travel and mobility in processes of identity formation among the Positanesi. Tourist Studies: An International Journal14(2): 182–202.
9.
CanosaA (2016) Voices from the margin: Youth, identity and belonging in a tourist destination. Doctoral Dissertation, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia. Available at: http://epubs.scu.edu.au/theses/542/.
10.
CanosaA (2018) ‘Mummy when are we getting to the fields?’ Doing fieldwork with three children. In: PorterBSchänzelH (eds) Femininity in the Field: Tourism and Transdisciplinary Research. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Channel View Publications, pp. 84–95.
11.
CanosaAGrahamA (2016) Ethical tourism research involving children. Annals of Tourism Research61: 219–221.
12.
CanosaAGrahamAWilsonE (2018) Growing up in a tourist destination: Negotiating space, identity and belonging. Children’s Geographies16(2): 156–168.
13.
CanosaAWilsonEGrahamA (2017) Empowering young people through participatory film: A postmethodological approach. Current Issues in Tourism20: 894–907.
14.
ChristensenPH (2004) Children’s participation in ethnographic research: Issues of power and representationChildren & Society18(2): 165–176.
15.
ColesTHallCMDuvalDT (2006) Tourism and post-disciplinary enquiry. Current Issues in Tourism9(4–5): 293–319.
16.
CoxSDrewSGuilleminMet al. (2014) Guidelines for Ethical Visual Research Methods. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: The University of Melbourne.
17.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
DavisJM (1998) Understanding the meanings of children: A reflexive process. Children & Society12(5): 325–335.
19.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (2011) Introduction: Disciplining the practice of qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 1–9.
20.
DoyleS (2013) Reflexivity and the capacity to think. Qualitative Health Research23(2): 248–255.
21.
EtheringtonK (2007) Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry13(5): 599–616.
22.
FreireP (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed (2000 ed.). New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
23.
FullagarS (2017) Post-qualitative inquiry and the new materialist turn: Implications for sport, health and physical culture research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health9(2): 247–257.
24.
GallacherLAGallagherM (2008) Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory methods’. Childhood15(4): 499–516.
25.
GallagherM (2009) Ethics. In: TisdallKDavisJMGallagherM (eds) Researching with Children and Young People: Research Design, Methods and Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 11–28.
26.
GildersleeveRE (2010) Dangerously important moment(s) in reflexive research practices with immigrant youth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education23(4): 407–421.
27.
GrahamAFitzgeraldR (2010) Progressing children’s participation: Exploring the potential of a dialogical turn. Childhood17(3): 343–359.
28.
GrahamAPowellMATruscottJ (2016) Exploring the nexus between participatory methods and ethics in early childhood research. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood41(1): 82–89.
29.
GrahamAPowellMATaylorNet al (2013) Ethical Research Involving Children. Available at: http://childethics.com.
30.
GubriumAHarperKOtañezM (2015) Introduction. In: GubriumAHarperKOtañezM (eds) Participatory Visual and Digital Research in Action (pp. 15-38). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
31.
GuilleminMGillamL (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry10(2): 261–280.
32.
HartRA (1992) Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
33.
HollandSRenoldERossNJet al. (2010) Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood17(3): 360–375.
34.
HollinsheadK (2010) Tourism studies and confined understanding: The call for a ‘new sense’ postdisciplinary imaginary. Tourism Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Journal15(4): 499–512.
35.
KellettM (2004) ‘Just teach us the skills please, we’ll do the rest’: Empowering ten-year-olds as active researchers. Children & Society18(5): 329–343.
36.
KemmisS (2008) Critical theory and participatory action research. In: ReasonPBradburyH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 121–138.
37.
KincheloeJLMcLarenPSteinbergSR (2011) Critical pedagogy, and qualitative research: Moving to the bricolage. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 163–178.
38.
LatherPPierreEASt. (2013) Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education26(6): 629–633.
39.
MannayD (2010) Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible?Qualitative Research10(1): 91–111.
40.
MartinVYChristidisLPeclGT (2016) Public interest in marine citizen science: Is there potential for growth?BioScience66(8): 683–692.
41.
MayesE (2016) Shifting research methods with a becoming-child ontology: Co-theorising puppet production with high school students. Childhood23(1): 105–122.
42.
MeloniFVanthuyneKRousseauC (2015) Towards a relational ethics: Rethinking ethics, agency and dependency in research with children and youth. Anthropological Theory15(1): 106–123.
43.
MillerK. (2018). The Ethics of Visual Research and Participant Empowerment. In BoucherM. L. (Ed.), Participant Empowerment Through Photo-elicitation in Ethnographic Education Research: New Perspectives and Approaches (pp. 25-44). Switzerland: Springer.
44.
MorrissL (2016) Dirty secrets and being ‘strange’: Using ethnomethodology to move beyond familiarity. Qualitative Research16(5): 526–540.
45.
PhelanSKKinsellaEA (2013) Picture this … Safety, dignity, and voice – Ethical research with children: Practical considerations for the reflexive researcher. Qualitative Inquiry19(2): 81–90.
46.
PinkS (2007) Walking with video. Visual Studies22(3): 240–252.
47.
PowellMASmithAB (2009) Children’s participation rights in research. Childhood16(1): 124–142.
48.
PowellMAFitzgeraldRTaylorNJet al. (2012) International Literature Review: Ethical Issues in Undertaking Research with Children and Young People (Childwatch International Research Network). Lismore, NSW, Australia: Centre for Children and Young People, Southern Cross University; Dunedin, New Zealand: Centre for Research on Children and Families, University of Otago.
49.
RichardsonMJ (2015) Embodied intergenerationality: Family position, place and masculinity. Gender, Place & Culture22(2): 157–171.
50.
RobsonEPorterGHampshireKet al. (2009) ‘Doing it right?’: Working with young researchers in Malawi to investigate children, transport and mobility. Children’s Geographies7(4): 467–480.
51.
SpyrouS (2011) The limits of children’s voices: From authenticity to critical, reflexive representation. Childhood18(2): 151–165.
52.
PierreEASt. (2014) A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward ‘post inquiry’. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing30(2): 2–19.
53.
SwartzS (2011) ‘Going deep’ and ‘giving back’: Strategies for exceeding ethical expectations when researching amongst vulnerable youth. Qualitative Research11(1): 47–68.
54.
SweetmanP (2009) Just anybody? Images, ethics and recognition. In: GillettJ (ed.) Just Anybody. Renja Leino. Winchester: Fotonet/The Winchester Gallery, pp. 7–9.
55.
TedlockB (2005) The observation of participation and the emergence of public ethnography. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 151–172.
56.
TribeJLiburdJJ (2016) The tourism knowledge system. Annals of Tourism Research57: 44–61.
57.
WarinJ (2011) Ethical mindfulness and reflexivity: Managing a research relationship with children and young people in a 14-year qualitative longitudinal research (QLT) study. Qualitative Inquiry17(9): 805–814.
58.
WarrDGuilleminMCoxSet al. (eds) (2016) Ethics and Visual Research Methods: Theory, Methodology, and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
WilesRProsserJBagnoliAet al (2008) Visual ethics: Ethical issues in visual research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper NCRM/011. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-011.pdf.
60.
WilsonEHollinsheadK (2015) Qualitative tourism research: Opportunities in the emergent soft sciences. Annals of Tourism Research54: 30–47.
