An ethical commitment to liberating children has led childhood scholars to overlook pedagogies that afford children’s active participation. This article thus shows how preschool teachers contribute to less hierarchical moments of intergenerational interaction with their students, facilitating opportunities for agency. Teachers do so by embodying the ideal preschooler, becoming readable to children as affiliative through their bodies. The author describes these practices and highlights the ideological contexts that facilitate their emergence, and then explores contexts that limit, constrain, or change them.
AhnJ (2010) “I’m not scared of anything” emotion as social power in children’s worlds. Childhood17(1): 94–112.
2.
AlanenL (1994) Gender and generation: Feminism and the child Question. In: QvortropJBardyMSgrittaGet al. (eds) Childhood Matters: Social Theory, Practice and Politics. Aldershot: Avebury.
3.
AlanenL (2017) Childhood studies and the challenge of ontology. Childhood24(2): 147–150.
AldersonP (2013) Childhoods Real and Imagined: Volume 1: An Introduction to Critical Realism and Childhood Studies. London; New York: Routledge.
6.
ÅmotIYtterhusB (2014) “Talking bodies”: Power and counter-power between children and adults in day care. Childhood21(2): 260–273.
7.
ArcherM (2001) Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BaileyD (in press) The ideal career role: Acknowledging gender in childhood ethnography. Ethnography and Education.
9.
BolligSKelleH (2016) Children as participants in practices: The challenges of practice theories to an actor-centered sociology of childhood. In: EsserFBaaderMBetzTet al. (eds) Reconceptualizing Agency and Childhood: New Perspectives in Childhood Studies. London; New York: Routledge.
10.
BordoS (1999) The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and in Private. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
11.
BoydM (2013) “I Love my work but…” The professionalization of early childhood education. Qualitative Report18(36): 1–20.
12.
BredekampS (ed.) (1987) Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth Through Age8, Expanded edn. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
13.
CookDT (2010) A ghostly presence. Childhood18(1): 3–6.
14.
CorsaroW (1992) Interpretive reproduction in children’s peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly55(2): 160–177.
15.
CorsaroW (2003) We’re Friends, Right? Inside Kids’ Culture. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
16.
ElgasP (2010) A peer culture perspective of English language learners’ social competence. In: KantorFMadridSKantorR (eds) Educating Toddlers to Teachers. New York: Hampton Press, pp. 113–136.
17.
EnglandP (2005) Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology31: 381–399.
18.
EpsteinAS (2007) Essentials of Active Learning in Preschool: Getting to Know the Highscope Curriculum. Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope Press.
19.
EsserF (2016) Neither “thick” nor “thin”: Reconceptualizing agency and childhood relationally. In: EsserFBaaderMBetzTet al. (eds) Reconceptualizing Agency and Childhood: New Perspectives in Childhood Studies. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 48–60.
FernieDMadridSKantorR (2010) Educating Toddlers to Teachers: Learning to See and Influence the School and Peer Cultures of Classrooms. New York: Hampton Press.
22.
FineGA (1987) With the Boys: Little League Baseball and Preadolescent Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
GlaserBGStraussA (2009 [1967]) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
24.
HadleyKGNengaSK (2004) From snow white to digimon using popular media to confront Confucian values in Taiwanese peer cultures. Childhood11(4): 515–536.
25.
HammersleyM (2016) Childhood studies: A sustainable paradigm?Childhood24(1): 113–127.
26.
HamreBKPiantaRC (2005) Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?Child Development76(5): 949–967.
27.
HohmannM (2008) Educating Young Children: Active Learning Practices for Preschool and Child Care Programs. Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope Press.
28.
JamesAProutA (1997) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, 2nd edn.Washington, DC: Routledge.
JohannsenB (2012) Doing adulthood in childhood research. Childhood19(101): 101–114.
31.
LeavittR (1995) The emotional culture of infant-toddler day care. In: HatchJA (ed.) Qualitative Research in Early Childhood Settings. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, pp. 3–21.
32.
LeeN (1998) Towards an immature sociology. The Sociological Review46(3): 458–481.
33.
LeeN (2001) Childhood and Society: Growing Up in an Age of Uncertainty. Buckingham: Open University Press.
34.
LeeN (2005) Childhood and Human Value: Development, Separation and Separability, 1st edn. London: Open University Press.
35.
MandellN (1988) The least-adult role in studying children. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography16(4): 433–467.
36.
MarotoMBrandonR (2011) Summary of background data on the ECCE workforce. Commissioned paper from the early childhood care and education workforce challenges and opportunities: A workshop report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
OswellD (2013) The Agency of Children: From Family to Global Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
PascalCBertramT (2009) Listening to young citizens: The struggle to make real a participatory paradigm in research with young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal17(2): 249–262.
40.
ProutA (ed.) (2000) The Body, Childhood and Society. London: Macmillan Publishers.
41.
ProutA (ed.) (2005) The Future of Childhood. New York: Routledge.
42.
PughAJ (2013) The theoretical costs of ignoring childhood: Rethinking independence, insecurity, and inequality. Theory and Society43(1): 71–89.
43.
RaffetyEL (2014) Minimizing social distance: Participatory research with children. Childhood22(3): 409–422.
44.
ReckwitzA (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263.
45.
ReichJA (2003) Pregnant with possibility: Reflections on embodiment, access, and inclusion in field research. Qualitative Sociology26(3): 351–367.
46.
RogersS (2010) Rethinking Play and Pedagogy in Early Childhood Education: Concepts, Contexts and Cultures. New York: Routledge.
47.
RoseCA (2011) Personal powers of the child: Object lessons and languages of agency in the sciences of childhood. Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth4(3): 371–381.
48.
RyanP (2008) How new is the “new” social study of childhood? The myth of the paradigm shift. Journal of Interdisciplinary History38(4): 553–576.
49.
SchweinhartL (2005) Lifetime Effects: The HighScope/Perry Preschool Study Through Age 40. Ypsilanti, MI: Highscope Educational Research Foundation.
50.
SmithK (2011) Producing governable subjects: Images of childhood old and new. Childhood19(1): 24–37.
51.
ThorneB (1993) Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
52.
Van HoornJNourotPMScalesBet al. (1999) Play at the Center of the Curriculum, 2nd edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Press.
53.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
WarmingH (2011) Getting under their skins? Accessing young children’s perspective through ethnographic fieldwork. Childhood18(1): 39–53.
55.
WoodDMiddletonD (1975) A study of assisted problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology66(2): 181–191.
