Children’s rights to asylum have emerged as an urgent political challenge. This article uses a number of cases discussed in Sweden’s largest morning paper to analyse claims of asylum-seeking children and how these claims challenge the normative limits of contemporary asylum, concerning what and who ought to be recognized by law. Even though the universality of the child constitutes a running theme, the arguments and the conception of children underpinning the claims are diverse. The article suggests that the claiming of rights as a socio-political practice could be a vital analytical approach to studying children’s rights and offers a much needed alternative to the dominant mainstreaming paradigm.
AndersonB (2012) Where’s the harm in that? Immigration enforcement, trafficking, and the protection of migrants rights. American Behavioral Scientist56(9): 1241–1257.
2.
AndersonBGibneyMJPaulettiE (2011) Citizenship, deportation and the boundaries of belonging. Citizenship Studies15(5): 547–563.
3.
AscherHEastmondM (2011) In the best interest of the child? The politics of vulnerability and negotiations for asylum in Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies37(8): 1185–1200.
4.
BeckmanL (2008) Public justifiability and children. The International Journal of Children’s Rights16: 141–152.
5.
BenhabibS (2004) The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BenhabibS (2011) Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BenhabibS (2013) Reason-Giving and Rights-Bearing: Constructing the Subject of Rights. Constellations Volume20(1): 38-50
8.
BhabhaJ (2009) Arendt’s children: Do today’s migrant children have a right to have rights?Human Rights Quarterly31(2): 410–451.
9.
BhabhaJ (2014) Child Migration and Human Rights in a Global Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BosniakL (2008) The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Care of Young People Act 1990:52.
12.
CarensJ (2014) Ethics of Immigration (Oxford political theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GinerC (2007) The politics of childhood and asylum in the UK. Children & Society21: 249–260.
19.
HansonK (2014) ‘Killed by charity’ – Towards interdisciplinary children’s rights studies. Childhood21(4): 441–446.
20.
JosefssonJ (2014) Children as moral subjects in ethics of Migration. In: Societas Ethica Conference in Sibue – Conference Proceedings. Available at: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/097/013/ecp12097013.pdf
21.
JosefssonJ (2016) Children’s rights to asylum and the capabilities approach. Ethical Perspectives23(1): 101–130.
22.
JosefssonJ (in press) Children’s rights to asylum in the Swedish migration court of appeal. International Journal of Children’s Rights.
23.
KallioKPHäkliJ (2011) Tracing children’s politics. Political Geography30(2): 99–109.
24.
KoskeniemmiM (2009) The politics of International Law – 20 years later. European Journal of International Law20(1): 7–19.
25.
KromhoutM (2009) Return of separated children: The impact of Dutch policies. International Migration49(5): 25–47.
26.
LindahlH (2013) The Fault Lines of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
ListerR (2007) Why Citizenship: Where, when and how children?Theoretical Inquiries in Law8(2): 693–718.
28.
LundbergA (2011) The best interests of the child principle in Swedish asylum cases: The marginalization of children’s rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice3(1): 49–70.
29.
MarshallTH (1950) Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Migration Court of Appeal:2007:43, 2009:8, 2009:9, 2009:31, 2010:6, 2013:6.
32.
Moosa-MithaM (2005) A difference-centered alternative to theorization of children’s citizenship rights.Citizenship Studies9(4): 369–388.
33.
NakataS (2015) Childhood Citizenship, Governance and Policy: The Politics of Becoming Adult. Abingdon: Routledge.
34.
QuennerstedtA (2013) Children’s rights research moving into the future – Challenges on the way forward. International Journal of Children’s Rights21: 233–247.
35.
RawlsJ (1997) The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review64(3): 765–807.
36.
RazJ (1995) Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Clarendon Press
37.
ReynaertDBouverne-De BieMVandeveldeS (2012) Between ‘believers’ and ‘opponents’: Critical discussions on children’s rights. International Journal of Children’s Rights20(1): 155–168.
38.
SandbergK (2014) The role of national courts in promoting children’s rights. International Journal of Children’s Rights22: 1–20.
39.
SmythC (2014) European Asylum Law and the Rights of the Child. London: Routledge.
40.
SpijkerboerT (2000) Gender and Refugee Status. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
41.
SternR (2014) Our refugee policy is generous: Reflections on the importance of a state’s self-image. Refugee Survey Quarterly33(1): 25–43.
42.
SternR (2015) Unaccompanied and separated asylum-seeking minors: Implementing a rights-based approach in the asylum process. In: MahmoudiSKaldalALainpeltoK. (eds) Child-Friendly Justice: What It Means and How It Is Realized. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, pp. 242–255.
VandenholeW (2015) Children’s rights from a legal perspective: Children’s rights law. In: VandenholeWDesmetEReynaertD. (eds) Routledge International Handbook of Children’s Rights. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 27–42.
49.
VitusKLidénH (2010) The status of the asylum-seeking child in Norway and Denmark: Comparing discourses, politics and practices. Journal of Refugee Studies23(1): 62–81.
