This study examines how possibilities for agency are designed into online youth counselling services, as well as how such possibilities are addressed by young prospective users during the design of the services. The data are drawn both from the design of a national website for youth clinics in Sweden and from a design project developing e-services for local youth clinics in a Swedish municipality. The agency of young users is here treated as a key concern for understanding how user empowerment is accomplished through the design of websites and e-services. Using combined research materials (i.e. two websites and focus group meetings), this study demonstrates how design features may both facilitate and restrict young people’s involvement and control over sensitive and private issues. In addition, we demonstrate how the designed possibilities for empowerment may allow young users to critically approach and effectively use such services.
AlpayLToussaintPZwetsloot-SchonkB (2004) Supporting healthcare communication enabled by information and communication technology: Can HCI and related cognitive aspects help? In: Proceedings of the conference on Dutch directions in HCI, Amsterdam, 10 June, p. 12. New York: ACM Press.
2.
BenyonD (2010) Designing Interactive Systems: A Comprehensive Guide to HCI and Interaction Design. Harlow: Addison Wesley.
3.
BoonaertTVettenburgN (2011) Young people’s internet use: Divided or diversified?Childhood18(1): 55–66.
4.
boydd (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
ColleyHHodkinsonP (2001) Problems with bridging the gap: The reversal of structure and agency in addressing social exclusion. Critical Social Policy21(3): 335–359.
6.
D’AlessandroDMDosaNP (2001) Empowering children and families with information technology. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine155(10): 1131–1136.
7.
DanbySButlerCEmmisonM (2009) When ‘listeners can’t talk’: Comparing active listening in opening sequences of telephone and online counselling. Australian Journal of Communication36(2): 1–23.
8.
DourishPChalmersM (1994) Running out of space: Models of information navigation. In: Proceedings of HCI’94 Conference, Glasgow, 23–26 August, pp. 23–26. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
9.
EmmisonMButlerCDanbyS (2011) Script proposals: A device for empowering clients in counselling. Discourse Studies13(1): 3–26.
10.
HallCSlembrouckSSarangiS (2006) Language Practices in Social Work: Categorisation and Accountability in Child Welfare. London: Routledge.
11.
HeathCLuffPSvenssonMS (2003) Technology and medical practice. Sociology of Health & Illness25: 75–96.
12.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerGH (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.
13.
JenkinsHItoMboydd (2015) Participatory Culture in a Networked Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
JohannsenNKensingF (2005) Empowerment reconsidered. In: Proceedings of CC ’05 the 4th decennial conference on critical computing: Between sense and sensibility, Aarhus, 21–25 August, pp. 203–206. New York: ACM Press.
15.
KingRBamblingMReidW. (2006) Telephone and online counselling for young people: A naturalistic comparison of session outcome, session impact and therapeutic alliance. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research6(3): 175–181.
16.
LadnerRE (2008) Access and empowerment: Commentary on ‘computers and people with disabilities’. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing1(11): 5.
17.
LadnerRE (2015) Design for user empowerment. Interactions22(2): 24–29.
18.
LindegaardLB (2014) Doing focus group research: Studying rational ordering in focus group interaction. Discourse Studies16(5): 629–644.
19.
LivingstoneSHaddonL (2008) Risky experiences for children online: Charting European research on children and the internet. Children & Society22(4): 314–323.
20.
LöfbergCAspánM (2011) Digitala erbjudanden: Om ungas erfarenheter av information, stöd och samspel med vuxna online. Stockholm: Institutionen för Pedagogik och didaktik, Stockholms universitet.
21.
LundmarkSLymerG (2016 in press) Analogies in interaction: Practical reasoning and participatory design. To be published in: Text & Talk.
22.
LundmarkSNormarkM (2012) Reflections on norm-critical design efforts in online youth counselling. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI ’12, Copenhagen, 14–17 October, pp. 438–447. New York: ACM Press.
23.
McCarthyJWrightP (2004) Technology as Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24.
PalenLDourishP (2003) Unpacking ‘privacy’ for a networked world. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems CHI 2003, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 5–10 April, pp. 129–136. New York: ACM Press.
25.
PauwelsL (2012) A multimodal framework for analyzing websites as cultural expressions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(3): 247–265.
26.
RäsänenMMobergÅPichaM. (2010) Meeting at a distance: Experiences of media companies in Sweden. Technology in Society32(4): 264–273.
27.
SavignyH (2013) Media, politics and empowerment: In whose Interest? In: ScullionRGerodimosRJacksonD. (eds) The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment. London: Routledge, pp. 13–23.
28.
UMO.se (2012) UMO – The national website for youth clinics in Sweden. Available at: http://www.umo.se/ (accessed 15 March 2012).
29.
UMO.se (2014) UMO – The national website for youth clinics in Sweden. Available at: http://www.umo.se/ (accessed 13 May 2015).
30.
YoungK (1999) Youth worker as guide, philosopher and friend: The realities of participation and empowerment. In: BanksS (ed.) Ethical Issues in Youth Work. New York: Routledge, pp. 77–92.
