Many non-governmental organisations exclusively sponsor education of ‘vulnerable’ girls who are seen as poor, oppressed and sexually abused. Based on fieldwork conducted in Kampala, Uganda, in 2012, we explore the views of sponsored girls, non-governmental organisation staff and educators on ‘vulnerability’ and scholarship programmes. Educators and non-governmental organisation staff agreed the sponsored girls were at risk of having relationships with ‘sugar daddies’ and becoming pregnant. Although the girls acknowledged their lives had been tough, they did not see themselves as ‘vulnerable’. While western representations of Third World women identified by Mohanty mostly apply for ‘vulnerable’ girls, the sponsorship programmes might change the girls’ self-image.
BarungiMKasiryeIAhaibweG (2014) Options for Improving Girls’ Access to Secondary Education in Uganda. Kampala, Uganda: Economic Policy Research Centre.
2.
BeneríaL (2013) Gender, Development and Globalization: Economics as If All People Mattered. London: Routledge.
3.
ChantS (2008) The ‘feminisation of poverty’ and the ‘feminisation’ of anti-poverty programmes: Room for revision?Journal of Development Studies44(2): 165–197.
4.
CheneyK (2010) Deconstructing childhood vulnerability: An introduction. Childhood in Africa2(1): 4–7.
5.
CohenS (2000) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.
GukurumeS (2011) Transactional sex and politics of the belly at tertiary educational institutions in the era of HIV and AIDS: A case study of Great Zimbabwe University and Masvingo Polytechnical College. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa13(3): 178–193.
10.
HurstSA (2008) Vulnerability in research and health care: Describing the elephant in the room?Bioethics22(4): 191–202.
11.
KellyJRGrayRHSewankamboNK. (2003) Age difference in sexual partners and risk of HIV-1 infection in Rural Uganda. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes32(4): 446–451.
12.
Leclerc-MadlalaS (2003) Transactional sex and the pursuit of modernity. Social Dynamics29(2): 213–233.
13.
LewinKM (2009) Access to education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Patterns, problems and possibilities. Comparative Education45(2): 151–174.
14.
LewinKMSabatesR (2012) Who gets what? Is improved access to basic education pro-poor in Sub-Saharan Africa?International Journal of Educational Development32: 517–528.
15.
MartensK (2006) NGOs in the United Nations system: Evaluating theoretical approaches. Journal of International Development18(5): 191–700.
16.
MlyakadoBPTimothyN (2014) Effects of students’ sexual relationship on academic performance among secondary school students in Tanzania. Academic Research International5(4): 278–286.
17.
MohantyC (2003 [1986]) Under the western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In: Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 17–42.
18.
MorrellRJewkesRLindeggerG (2012) Hegemonic masculinity/masculinities in South Africa: Culture, power, and gender politics. Men and Masculinities15(1): 11–30.
NaudéWSantos-PaulinoAUMcGillivrayM (2008) Vulnerability in Developing Countries. Research Brief Number 2. Helsinki: UNU – Wider.
21.
OlanrewajuADJefferyCCrosslandN. (2015) Access to education for orphans and vulnerable children in Uganda: A multi-district, cross-sectional study using lot quality assurance sampling from 2011 to 2013. PloS ONE10(7): e0132905.
22.
OtisoKM (2006) Culture and Customs of Uganda. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
23.
RoslingH (2013) Truth about education data (Video File). World Innovation Summit for Education. Available at: http://www.wise-qatar.org/hans-rosling (accessed 22 May 2015).
24.
ShannMHBryantMHBrooksMI. (2013) The effectiveness of educational support to orphans and vulnerable children in Tanzanina and Uganda. ISRN Public Health2013: 1–9.
25.
SheferTClowesLVergnaniT (2012) Narratives of transactional sex on a university campus. Culture, Health and Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care14(4): 435–447.
26.
SilberschmidtMRaschV (2001) Adolescent girls, illegal abortions and “Sugar Daddies” in Dar es Salaam: Vulnerable victims and active social agents. Social Science & Medicine52: 1815–1826.
27.
TurnerE (2010) Why has the number of international non-governmental organizations exploded since 1960?Cliodynamics: The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History1(1): 82–91.
UNESCO (2015) Global Monitoring Report. Education for All 2000–2015: Achievements and Challenges. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
32.
UNICEF (2009) Guidance document: Developing and operationalizing a national monitoring and evaluation system for the protection, care and support of orphans and vulnerable children living in a World with HIV and AIDS. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/aids/files/OVC_MandE_Guidance_FINAL_v3.pdf (accessed 18 November 2015).
33.
UtasM (2005) Victimacy, girlfriending, soldiering: Tactic agency in a young woman’s social navigation of the Liberian war zone. Anthropological Quarterly78(2): 403–430.
34.
WalkerDPereznietoPBantebyaG. (2014) Sexual Exploitation of Adolescent Girls in Uganda: The Drivers, Consequences and Responses to the ‘Sugar Daddy’ Phenomenon. London: Overseas Development Institute.
35.
WilsonK (2011) ‘Race’, gender and neoliberalism: Changing visual representations in development. Third World Quarterly32(2): 315–331.
